+bushwackin' schmo Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 Any cachers over 275lbs.? Chicks dig big dudes. Quote
+Morgan's Marauders Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 Any cachers over 275lbs.? Chicks dig big dudes. I'm no "big dude," but I am a "big chick." Hopefully, with some more caching (placing and finding,) I will be less of a big chick and more of a big cacher at the end of this summer. Quote
+Team GPSaxophone Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 Any cachers over 275lbs.? Chicks dig big dudes. I'm about 90 lbs. too skinny for you. Sorry Quote
+bushwackin' schmo Posted April 16, 2005 Author Posted April 16, 2005 Whaaaa! 90lbs. Are you hungry? Quote
+Team GPSaxophone Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 Whaaaa! 90lbs. Are you hungry? No no, 90 lbs. too skinny, not 90 lbs. That's 275 - 90 = 185 lbs. Divine: 90 lbs. is about 41 kg., so 275 lbs. is about 125 kg. (I weigh about 185 lbs., or 84 kg.) Quote
+Moose Mob Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 (edited) How much is 275lbs? Or 90lbs? Depends on the USDA rating, but usually $3.00 to $6.50 per lb. Edited April 16, 2005 by Moose Mob Quote
+Anonymous' Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 Whaaaa! 90lbs. Are you hungry? No no, 90 lbs. too skinny, not 90 lbs. That's 275 - 90 = 185 lbs. Divine: 90 lbs. is about 41 kg., so 275 lbs. is about 125 kg. (I weigh about 185 lbs., or 84 kg.) Quote
+Team GPSaxophone Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 Whaaaa! 90lbs. Are you hungry? No no, 90 lbs. too skinny, not 90 lbs. That's 275 - 90 = 185 lbs. Divine: 90 lbs. is about 41 kg., so 275 lbs. is about 125 kg. (I weigh about 185 lbs., or 84 kg.) What? You don't know metric? Quote
+M&DofKJE Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 Dad is a solid 300... could lose a few but I appreciate urban micros a bit much. Quote
+Zeute Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 As a short female cacher I hope I don't hit 275! Otherwise I am with Morgan's Marauders on this one! Quote
+1stimestar Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 Chicks dig big dudes. Depends on how tall you are. 275 at 6'2"= nice. 275 at 5'5" = a bit more man that I need. Quote
+Moose Mob Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 Chicks dig big dudes. Depends on how tall you are. 275 at 6'2"= nice. 275 at 5'5" = a bit more man that I need. Is 6'1" @ 180 considered too skinny? Quote
+briansnat Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 I was 240 (everyone says I didn't look a pound over 230) until I stopped drinking beer during the week. I don't know what I'm at now, but I'm fitting into pants I haven't fit into in 5 years. You know, the pants you have in the closet that you won't throw away because you plan to lose weight and wear them again some day. Well it happened. I was around 215 when they fit so I'm guessing I'm in that ballpark now. Quote
+Zephyrpl Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 Okay, I'm the size of your average NFL offensive lineman, but that hasn't prevented me from cching. BTW, where are all those chicks who dig big dudes? Zephyr Quote
uperdooper Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 Okay, I'm the size of your average NFL offensive lineman, but that hasn't prevented me from cching. BTW, where are all those chicks who dig big dudes? Zephyr stands up and starts waving! Quote
uperdooper Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 I'm not fat, I'm big boned. it's those feathers, they make you look bigger and fluffier than you really are. Quote
+Team Benhamtroll Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 I was around 200 in August, dropped down to 180 now, and with Spring here at the National Forest opening up, I'm hoping to get that down even further by this August. I'm 5'8", so 200 lbs was way too much. Quote
+st3roadking Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 was 260 pounds when i started am now 150 WOW! good for you! steve Quote
+kfcthecolonel Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 I was an obese 335 on Feb 15th and started to eat healthy, then I started to try to get active and THEN I DISCOVERED GEOCACHING. I'm down to 299 and love my new outdoor, active hobby. I am in withdrawals this weekend since I could not go caching yesterday. My long term goal (1-3 lbs per week, so it's gonna take a while) is to get down to a trim 199. So you'll be seeing less of me on the GC Trails but I'll be out there more and more. Quote
+sTeamTraen Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 For many people, a moderate amount of exercise is not only the main difference between losing weight or not; it's also a solution to the real problem. Studies have consistently failed to find significant health risks in the single fact of being overweight, even quite severely so. What kills you is being out of condition. Of course, that also very often goes with overweight, but it can be a cause as much as an effect. I'm more or less ideal weight (6'4 200 lbs) but I've never been very fit. My stamina and general fitness level have noticeably increased in the last year with all this walking up and down hills (2/3 of the caches I find seem to involve 1000 ft or more or elevation change!). Quote
Hide-and-Seek Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 I admit to being the fattest Geocacher. And as far as the pun about chicks digging big dudes, it’s sort of true, it’s like being gay, they consider you safe. Quote
+bushwackin' schmo Posted April 17, 2005 Author Posted April 17, 2005 (edited) try 350..Schmo...got the crushed ribs to prove it! love Daytripper & Tagalong Edited April 17, 2005 by bushwackin' schmo Quote
+The Penguinz Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 I'm 6' 4" and was over 275 for a few years, but now I'm at 210. I'm OK with that weight, but would like to turn some of the belly blubber into something less jiggly. Mrs. Penguin is 5'2" and 98 lbs. We are very funny to watch at a slow dance. Quote
+Skyman Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 250 then down to 120 now back up to 170-180 and holding Quote
DayTripper&Tagalong Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 i think it doesn't matter how big you are..as long as you feel good about yourself. If you start feeling uncomfortable...lay off the chips and pick up a piece of fruit. Quote
+Team Tigger International Posted April 17, 2005 Posted April 17, 2005 I'm not fat, I'm big boned. Wulf I prefer my chickens with more meat and less bone. Wulf Quote
gridlox Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 370!! But hey!! It's an improvement! I started at 395! And Geocaching is the reason! Back in January I went with my bro-in-law on my first cache and I had to stop twice for a breather on a 1/1 with an about a 1/4 mile one way easy walk. I realized then that I had gotten SERIOUSLY, SERIOUSLY out of shape!! A decent cache on any sort of incline was definately out of the question. (Back 20 some odd years ago, I played soccer, rode 20-30 miles a week on my bicycle, and did rollerskate dance competitions!! What the heck happened to that guy!! ) I've been getting out walking more and more and have built up my stamina some. Just yesterday, I scoped out a future hide site near the previous 1/1. It was on the same trail system as the 1/1 but about 1/2 mile further on down. I went to the future hide site, stopped and rested for about 30 minutes while I took readings & walked away and back about 23-30 yards to check my waypoint. Then I walked back to my car by finishing the loop that the trail forms. It was about 3/4 mile back, BUT, around the last 100-125 yards was a fairly moderate incline (for a walking and bicycle path) and it really whooped me!! I got to the trail head and had to lean against the gate and rest for a bit before I could walk back to my car. Had to get a waypoint for the trailhead anyways, so I would have stopped reguardless. But I was defiantely greatful to be stopping. I really wanted to stop and get a breather while coming up the incline, but I pushed myself and made it!! 3 months ago, I seriously doubt I could have made the round trip walk without medical attention!! D-man Quote
+Team Fegel Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 I'm 330 lbs, but not in too bad a shape, but I could stand to loose some weight. I still play rugby with the "young men" (18 and over), but qualify as an old boy (35+). Here's a picture of me from a CITO event yesterday: http://img.Groundspeak.com/cache/log/a1f46...4824b9d9d4f.jpg I'm the guy with my daughter on my shoulders. Good for all of you who are getting out geocaching and changing your lifestyle and getting healthier. Quote
+Wacka Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 (edited) Last June, I found out I had very high BP (180/110) (5'4" and was 215 lbs). I had been geocaching for 9 months already, but avoided any climbing. I had no stamina and bad knees. I have lost 40 lbs with exercise, diet and geocaching. I can now climb amost of the hills in the area. I recently did a 6.7 mile flat hike and on another climbed up 1000 ft. Just waiting for the rainy season to end to get those caches in the hills. Edited April 18, 2005 by Wacka Quote
+Torry Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 I used to weigh a lot ... but that got depressing. Now I stay away form scales and I'm much happier. Quote
+clearpath Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Is 6'1" @ 180 considered too skinny? Yes, for me it would be to skinny. I am 6'1" and went from 210 down to 180 and didn't like it at all. I felt too weak and didn't feel like I had enough bulk, I didn't feel strong. Currently, I'm back to 210 but thats too much so I'm going to try and level off at 195. As for beer drinking adding weight ... its true. I gave up beer for 12 months and managed to keep my weight under 200. Then when my one year was up, I gained about 8 pounds in a week. Quote
+Team Tigger International Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 As a short female cacher I hope I don't hit 275! Otherwise I am with Morgan's Marauders on this one! Ditto that here as well , I am a bit on the heavy side and not tall shall we say , but no where near 275 ! Thank Goodness ! Star Quote
+tnfishdaddy Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 I am a fat cacher. Don't really know how much since the doctor's scales stop at 350. It does keep me from some of the harder caches. My goal this summer is to shed a little bit and make myself go for some of those harder ones. Since I have two little boys now, I really do need to lose the weight so I can be around for them. Quote
+AtoZ Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 What is the purpose of this thread?????????????? cheers Quote
+mork Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 part of why I looked to Geocaching was to get a little more excersice (any amount is more than I was doing). I'm 6'0" and 215lbs. Hoping my belly starts working its way back the other way this summer if I can get enough caching/hiking in. Quote
+beckerbuns Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Okay, I'm the size of your average NFL offensive lineman, but that hasn't prevented me from cching. BTW, where are all those chicks who dig big dudes? Zephyr I'm one of those chicks, and I found me one of those big dudes and married him! Quote
+kfcthecolonel Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Expressing our Hopes for our fitness, Praise for one another, Boasting of our accomplishments and discussion on whether or not Chicks Dig Fat Guys. All valid reasons to post here. Quote
+slapshot52 Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 18 months ago I was 5’10” and 260 pounds! I’m now down to 182 pounds. I would like to give geocaching all of the credit, but walking in the woods was only part of it. I did do a lot of “Push Aways” Push Away from the table Push Away from McDonalds Push Away from Coors Push Away from Krispy Kream Quote
+AtoZ Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Then why not say so in your OP. To me it seemed kind of a rude topic. I know many folks that have credited geocaching with improved health. Congratz on the weight lose that is impressive. cheers Quote
Bigbandjohn Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 I was well over 300 when I found my first cache. Glad to say I'm not anymore. Quote
+carleenp Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 until I stopped drinking beer during the week. I am sorry that such a tragic thing happened to you. I know a cacher who lost about 80 lbs from caching. I have started doing this to maintain my current weight: If I cache, I get to drink beer. I figure the calories burned caching equal the calories of a beer or too. Mmmm beer. Quote
+rusty_tlc Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 (edited) I'm with Carleenp on this one. I cache to build a calorie "bank", actually I guess it would be overdraft my calorie bank. Mmmmm Beer. Edit, Big fingers. Edited April 18, 2005 by rusty_tlc Quote
+Apples 2 Apples Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 (edited) For many people, a moderate amount of exercise is not only the main difference between losing weight or not; it's also a solution to the real problem. Studies have consistently failed to find significant health risks in the single fact of being overweight, even quite severely so. What kills you is being out of condition. Of course, that also very often goes with overweight, but it can be a cause as much as an effect. I'm more or less ideal weight (6'4 200 lbs) but I've never been very fit. My stamina and general fitness level have noticeably increased in the last year with all this walking up and down hills (2/3 of the caches I find seem to involve 1000 ft or more or elevation change!). I can attest to this as I am around 245 at 5'10 and can out pace any of the people myself and misses apple cache, hike or do anything with. A lot of our friends are what would be considered "in shape" and they are out of breath 1/4 of the way up a large incline while I stand at the top shaking my head. I wouldn't say that I am perfectly healthy, but I believe despite my weight I may possibly be in better shape than some of our friends. This is also despite gaining 45 pounds in the last 6 months. I was 312, dropped to 200 last year. Had some surgery and became imobile for some time... used that as an excuse to eat like crap and am now at 245 and hopefully dropping. The misses isn't quite at ideal weight either, but she is becoming much more "in shape" as we go along both wieght and cardiovascular. Improved activity is what helps someone become more healthy... Although losing weight does help, and does in some way encourage activity. Its not the answer to all of our problems. Someone who is only 5'5" and 180 may be out of breath climbing three stairs, have high colesterol and blood pressure through the roof. Weight does not always mean health. Edited April 18, 2005 by Apples 2 Apples Quote
+monimoni Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 yes, of course I must weigh in on this topic..... for those of you that do want to calculate your body mass index (BMI, which adjusts for weight, height, gender, age), here are some links, or you can google "body mass index" to find a BMI calculator or BMI website that you like best: http://nhlbisupport.com/bmi/ http://www.halls.md/body-mass-index/av.htm http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/calc-bmi.htm http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/bmi-for-age.htm yes, absolutely, it's not just about fat, or BMI for that matter, it's about fitness, stamina, and being in shape. but for those of you who are just in the "beginning throes" of reclaiming your fitness, and if you might be in a "high risk" category (e.g. extremely obese, personal or family history of cardiovascular problems,etc).....please think about first making an appointment with a health care professional who can talk you through a reasonable workout plan, including how to incrementally step-up the strenousness over time, and can show you how to monitor your heart rate to make sure you're staying safe....if not for yourself, then do it for us.....you know, we worry..... now, about that other topic "do chicks dig big guys".....I think, for gal's, it's not so much about big guys or small guys or tall guys or short guys or beefy guys or lean guys......it's more about a "guy guy" being a stand-up guy, being a good guy, a well-balanced guy (confident but not arrogant, sensitive but not whiney, attentive but not controlling, etc), not a shallow guy, not a gay guy, and whatever the guy's physical attributes, those are secondary.....seriously, just check out Match.com, and compare the guy's profiles to the gal's profiles....... the gal's profiles HARDLY EVER mention a guy's physical attributes as important; yet nine times out of ten, no nineteen out of twenty, or twenty nine times out of thirty, the guy's profiles mention that they're looking for a gal that's "attractive", or "pretty", or "slim", or some other measure of "physical worth"....I'm telling ya, I ain't making this stuff up, check it out for yourself........ Quote
+sbell111 Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 (edited) Back when I was around thirty or so, I started packing on the pounds. I was becoming less and less active, but I kept eating like I did when I was out marching with the kids every day. Then about four years ago, I started caching. I was becoming more and more active and I could feel my stamina increase. I lost about 25 pounds and was really feeling good. Unfortunately, sometimes feeling too good about yourself can lead to TPTB knocking your down a few pegs. Since my accident last June, I find myself regressing into slovenly inactivity. I hurt, therefore I eat. When I'm depressed, I eat. When I'm bored, I eat. I've been doing alot of eating, but little moving. moo. Edited April 18, 2005 by sbell111 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.