Lactodorum Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 As a result of generally favourable commments here I've taken it upon myself to make some corrections to spelling and capitalisation errors on several caches I've reviewed. In each case I've e-mailed the owner (diplomatically I hope ) and I've yet to receive any criticism. Fingers crossed ........... Quote
+littlejim Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 I've taken it upon myself to make some corrections to spelling and capitalisation errors Does that mean we don't have to bother checking as you'll do it all for us? (only joking!) Quote
+mongoose39uk Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 (edited) Deleted Edited April 6, 2005 by mongoose39uk Quote
Alan White Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 I've taken it upon myself to make some corrections Jolly good. Perhaps this new service could be enhanced to include checkiing that the cache description actually makes sense, is understandable, and that it identifies the objective of the cache? I've seen some really strange ones recently. And, no, I'm not referring to the excellent but as yet unsolvable (by me, at least) puzzle caches. Neatly tying two recent threads together, perhaps that's why I can't understand some of these caches: they're actually mis-classified and should really be Mystery? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.