+treasure_hunter Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 I can see both ways, I believe that they should wait a day or two before going to find a cache, but I also believe that they have the right to be the FTF. Quote
+Hemlock Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 Volunteer reviewers ought to be able to be "first to find" on traditional caches which they've reviewed. This is because we have no special advantage or inside information, other than knowing about the listing the moment it becomes public. The astute forum reader might put two and two together and note that within the next 2 weeks we will lose that advantage. Quote
+CO Admin Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 Volunteer reviewers ought to be able to be "first to find" on traditional caches which they've reviewed. This is because we have no special advantage or inside information, other than knowing about the listing the moment it becomes public. The astute forum reader might put two and two together and note that within the next 2 weeks we will lose that advantage. Which is why I dont list them till Im there at the cache signing the logbook. PPC+Cell phone+wap interface=FTF. Quote
+joefrog Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 Caveat: I'm posting this before I read the entire thread! Personally, I don't see a problem with an approver being FTF -- especially if they weren't the approver for the particular cache in question. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.