+The Puzzler Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 I've downgraded recently. From my current residence in Monmouth OR: 13 within 5 km (4 mine) 20 within 10 km (5 mine) 150 within 25 km (5 mine) From my previous residence in Vancouver BC: 22 within 5 km 44 within 10 km 180 within 25 km Quote Link to comment
+Tuck Sackett Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 This topic made me wonder, so I did some math and ... From zipcode 38135 ( SW Tenn) 10 miles = 107 caches = 1 per 3 sq. miles 25 miles = 216 caches = 1 per 9 sq. miles 50 miles = 246 caches = 1 per 31 sq. miles 100 miles = 454 caches = 1 per 69 sq. miles There are a few cachers in my area that have placed some real quality caches and I am fortunate to be able to hunt for them. Having cached in other states I know that more is not always better. Read the Logs before you go. Quote Link to comment
+WebbyCat Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 The pickings are slim here. There are 18 caches in a ten mile radius of my home. Out of the 18, 13 of them are mine. It's gotten better though. When I started geocaching a year and a half ago, there were no caches within a ten mile radius Quote Link to comment
+Gonzo-YT Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 23 caches in an area just under 500,000 square km. Regards, Anthony Quote Link to comment
+Cymbaline Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 From my house (based on my latest queries and what GSAK is telling me) near Marietta, GA, I have roughly: 160 within 10 miles 280 within 15 miles 420 within 20 miles Quote Link to comment
+Apples 2 Apples Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 84 within 12 miles Quote Link to comment
+Old Bet Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 Forty-one (plus one we own) within 10 miles, 148 within 15 miles. We recently began a hunt for all those within 10 miles, then we'll venture into 15-mile territory. (We are not frequent cachers; we get out once or twice a month.) Quote Link to comment
+VegasCacheHounds Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 Las Vegas:500 in 35 miles radius 950 in 100 miles. Not many lame ones, but they are sinful. Wow, I've got my work cut out for me. I just moved from Vegas (which MM listed the stats for Vegas, co I won't repeat them) to Plano, Texas. Almost 400 within 10 miles of my new house, and I've only found 7. Jeez, there's 2259 within a 100 miles! I remember when I started in Vegas there was less than a 100 within a 100 miles, and that was in June of 2002. Amazing that its almost 10 times that in two and a half years! Shannon VegasCacheHounds Quote Link to comment
+Clan X-Man Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 23 within 20 mile radius from my home. THAT'S IT! I'm moving. Quote Link to comment
+Resolution Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 I must be a moron. I can't figure out how to search within a certain radius. Quote Link to comment
tubby and Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 (edited) i had an idea, i'm sure its not new. Take your number of finds=F Do a search from your home coordinates. Count F caches down the list. The distance from your home coordinates to the F cache might be a better indication of your personal cache effectiveness than simply caches found. Someone who has 400 caches within 12 miles is generally going to have more finds than someone with 4 in the same area. My personal distance would be 54 km (33.5 mi). Edited January 5, 2005 by tubby and Quote Link to comment
+Anonymous' Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 I have a little over 300 caches within ten miles of my house. Quote Link to comment
+fly46 Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 38 within ten miles. I own 28 of them, my wife owns three, one of our best friends owns three, and another close friend owns two. So there are two that are not here because of us or our group. My nearest unfound cache is 32 miles away and is a meeting that has not happened yet, next nearest is 35 miles as the crow flies, several more as the monkey drives. And yet you still have one of the highest find counts in the MTGC club. Quote Link to comment
+fly46 Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 23 caches in an area just under 500,000 square km. Regards, Anthony Yuck! If you ever want cache density overload, feel free to come to Nashville... My name is fly46, and I'll be your tour guide if you'd like me to be. Quote Link to comment
+ShowStop Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Thousand Oaks, CA - zip 91360 353 caches - 5 miles 641 caches - 10 miles 2200 caches - 50 miles 4547 caches - 100 miles (Half of that is over the ocean) Of those 4547 caches within 100 miles, I've found just about 25% of them. Quote Link to comment
+Team ARK-ville Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Arkville, NY 66 within 40 miles ( That's air miles) Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Haven't done this in a while, so here are the latest stats from my home Zipcode (07405) in north central New Jersey: 3 Within 1 mile 25 within 5 miles 142 within 10 miles 467 within 20 miles 1,502 within 50 miles 3,587 within 100 miles Quote Link to comment
+SwampGoat Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Here in the swamp we have: 17 caches in 20-mile radius 50 caches in 50-mile radius 511 caches in 100-mile radius Sometime soon I hope to add 4 to these numbers! I must be a moron. I can't figure out how to search within a certain radius. --Resolution Resolution - Don't feel bad, I don't know how to properly quote! To search by radius, click on the Hide & Seek a Cache link on the left-hand side of the page of the gc.com site. It will bring up a form to fill out...put in your zip code in the box, select the radius, and click search. The resulting cache finds will be totalled at the top of the resulting search. (My search for 100-mile radius said "Total Records: 511 - Page: 1 of 26") Quote Link to comment
+souperteam Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 395 within 50 miles. Living in southern Arizona you just come to expect having to drive a ways to do anything. I have 49 within 10 miles. I can't wait for the rain to stop so we can get out and do some more caching. Quote Link to comment
+Cyfi (Cap'n Omo) Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 180 within 10 miles... many are "drive-bys", but many are in the National Forest, beautiful hikes, waterfalls, mountain views. The beautiful area of Western North Carolina, USA. PS: One of the 180 is the infamous "Tube Torcher"... the most watched cache on the web. Quote Link to comment
+programmer64 Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 about 400 in a 20 mile radius Quote Link to comment
+Jeeping Family Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Where I am now: 34 in 5 miles 82 in 10 miles 254 in 25 miles 334 in 50 miles 600 in 100 miles Where I want to move to: 11 in 5 miles 29 in 10 miles 64 in 25 miles 117 in 50 miles 373 in 100 miles Maybe I should think about finding a better place to move to? Quote Link to comment
+saguaroastro Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 555 within 25 miles of 85226 (Chandler, Arizona). 652 within 25 miles of 85308, Glendale, AZ. Lots of overlap with Team 360's zipcode, mostly in the central Phoenix area. Soon to be 653, Planning my first hide this week. Quote Link to comment
+Harry Dolphin Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 The Ten-Mile List seems to be a standard. There are 113 on my ten-mile list. I've done over a half of them. One I'll never do. BrianSnat and his danged island cache! Another of BrianSnat's I have two DNFs on. On the other fin, my friend, Andy Bear, has 120 on his Ten-Mile List. We've done about half of those. But, there's a big difference on a Ten-Mile List that includes parts of New Jersey, and large parts of New York City (including one on an island with no roads to it). Brooklyn, Queens and The Bronx are neither easy nor cheap to get to. His 100 mile list has 3491 caches. My 100 mile list has 3582 caches. Like I'm going to drive to Delaware to finish this list! Quote Link to comment
+Marky Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 From my zipcode 95118: 1 mile: 17 5 miles: 223 10 miles: 540 25 miles: 1540 50 miles: 2870 100 miles: 4793 --Marky Quote Link to comment
+sduck Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 A 25 mile radius is about 2000 square miles. I hope you're exaggerating. Quote Link to comment
+ZackJones Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Using my zip of 31088 5 miles = 13 caches 10 miles = 16 caches 25 miles = 66 caches 50 miles = 102 caches 100 miles = 792 caches Quote Link to comment
+Team J&J Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 A 25 mile radius is about 2000 square miles. I hope you're exaggerating. Exaggerating by 37 sq. miles. For shame! Quote Link to comment
+pqcachers Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 from san diego: 10 miles: 175 50 miles: 1366 100 miles: 4248 considering there's mexico and the pacific for ~270 degrees of that, it's VERY dense! Quote Link to comment
+Gonzo-YT Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 23 caches in an area just under 500,000 square km. Yuck! If you ever want cache density overload, feel free to come to Nashville... My name is fly46, and I'll be your tour guide if you'd like me to be. If I ever make it down that way, I'll be sure to take you up on the offer. To be honest, I think I am very lucky. I'm more of a wilderness type -- I don't know if I would play if there were so many caches near me, it would take part of the game away. I also like the fact that I have caches in my nearest 20 that would take anywhere from 5-10 days for me to get. It makes you appreciate the value of a cache. I find that when I travel in the more cache-dense areas, I usually pick a few caches that pique my interest and I'll happily pass many other caches on my way there. Regards, Anthony Quote Link to comment
+seeker22 Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Chicagoland From 60565: 30 miles 1061 60 miles 1517 100 miles 2341 Quote Link to comment
+Resolution Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 (edited) Thanks for the help SwampGoat. I knew it was there, I just couldn't find it. Hmmm... what does that sound like? Anyway, 5 miles = 24 10 miles = 95 20 miles = 348 That should keep me busy! Edited January 5, 2005 by Resolution Quote Link to comment
+fly46 Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 I find that when I travel in the more cache-dense areas, I usually pick a few caches that pique my interest and I'll happily pass many other caches on my way there. Tell you what, you come here, we'll ignore the micros and do every cache on the 'oldest' list and every cache on the 'greatest hits' list. I've not done most of either, so it'll be good for me too. Quote Link to comment
+fly46 Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 I just checked from my dad's house - 29 caches in 10 miles, and the closest two are mine. Quote Link to comment
fishiam Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 I live in Seattle (zip code 98105). There are this many caches in the surrounding area: 161 within 5 miles 497 within 10 miles 1248 within 25 miles 2053 within 50 miles 3649 within 100 miles I'm responsible for exactly 1 of those, but I'm working on a couple of others peace! Quote Link to comment
rescue557 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Where I'm presently living, there are 4 geocaches within the town limits, 3 of which are mine. GPS devices are unheard of around this area and nobody I know has ever owned or even seen one in use. Sad, really. Quote Link to comment
+macatac1961 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 152 within 12 miles of my house in Islip, NY. I own 8 of them and found all but 2 of them. Quote Link to comment
+FtMgAl Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 A 25 mile radius is about 2000 square miles. I hope you're exaggerating. Exaggerating by 37 sq. miles. For shame! Ok, I'll admit that my figure was 1.825% high if you will admit that your accusation of 37 square miles is 1.334% higher than the actual exaggeration of 36.506 square miles. Picky, picky. It still means I have to drive a long way to get my next cache when many can bag more in a single day than my total for the past 6 month. But then again I might be exaggerating by a couple of percent. Quote Link to comment
+sduck Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 A 25 mile radius is about 2000 square miles. I hope you're exaggerating. Exaggerating by 37 sq. miles. For shame! Ok, I'll admit that my figure was 1.825% high if you will admit that your accusation of 37 square miles is 1.334% higher than the actual exaggeration of 36.506 square miles. Picky, picky. It still means I have to drive a long way to get my next cache when many can bag more in a single day than my total for the past 6 month. But then again I might be exaggerating by a couple of percent. Sorry about that. Did the math in my head, then posted, then redid the math on a calc and saw that it was a lot closer than I had originally thought. Doh!! Quote Link to comment
+Blaidd-Drwg Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 A 25 mile radius is about 2000 square miles. I hope you're exaggerating. Exaggerating by 37 sq. miles. For shame! Ok, I'll admit that my figure was 1.825% high if you will admit that your accusation of 37 square miles is 1.334% higher than the actual exaggeration of 36.506 square miles. Picky, picky. It still means I have to drive a long way to get my next cache when many can bag more in a single day than my total for the past 6 month. But then again I might be exaggerating by a couple of percent. Sorry about that. Did the math in my head, then posted, then redid the math on a calc and saw that it was a lot closer than I had originally thought. Doh!! Not too sure where everyone is getting their math for a 25 mile radius. I believe the formula for area of a circle is 2 (PI) r or in this case 2x25x3.14 or about 157 square miles. Quote Link to comment
CoyoteRed Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Not too sure where everyone is getting their math for a 25 mile radius. I believe the formula for area of a circle is 2 (PI) r or in this case 2x25x3.14 or about 157 square miles. 2(PI)R is to calculate the circumference of a circle with a given radius. (PI)R² is for the area of a circle with a given radius. Quote Link to comment
+Lemon Fresh Dog Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 There are 18 caches within a 2KM SQUARE of my home. Quote Link to comment
+GeoBrowns Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 San Jose, Calif. 5 mile radius-90 10 mile-363 20 m-1391 30 m-1940 50 m-3019 100 m-5147 Quote Link to comment
+Katydid & Miles Stone Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 We have 99 within 12 miles. 18 of those are ours. Quote Link to comment
+Team BubbyMac Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 THERE ARE ABOUT 30 WITH 10 MIL EOF ME 1 IS AN EVENT 2 ARE MINE AND 5 OF THEM ARE ACHIVED. LIVE IN INDIANA ABOUT 15 MILE NORTH OF TERRE HAUTE. Quote Link to comment
+BlackBrownDog Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 From Elmore, OH...East of Toledo, close to Lake Erie.... 10 miles = 16 caches 25 miles = 154 caches 50 miles = 987 caches 75 miles = 416 caches 100 miles = 1720 caches (added Cleveland...whew!) I like Toledo, because we have everything from traditional walk in the woods cache (from 500 feet to crossing creeks, climbing trees and walking 2-4 miles), creative urban micros, fake outs, puzzles, etc! Everyone seems to be conscious of the impact on the surroundings as well. Because of NWOGEO, we all know each other, help maintain other's caches and can razz each other in general!!! We run into the problem that caches in Ontario Canada are closer than some in Cleveland but twice the drive because of the WATER!!! Quote Link to comment
+Moose Mob Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 San Jose, Calif. 5 mile radius-90 10 mile-363 20 m-1391 30 m-1940 50 m-3019 100 m-5147 With that kind of cache density, I would have 2000 finds by now! Quote Link to comment
+Marky Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 San Jose, Calif. 5 mile radius-90 10 mile-363 20 m-1391 30 m-1940 50 m-3019 100 m-5147 With that kind of cache density, I would have 2000 finds by now! we are spoiled. By my count, the current leaders are: 1 mile: 95118 @ 17 (not very many people posted for this one) 5 miles: 91360 @ 353 10 miles: 91360 @ 640 50 miles: 94568 @ 3305 100 miles: 94568 @ 5425 My apologies if I missed anyones post. --Marky Quote Link to comment
+JT & PJ Cole Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 We live on the coast, so our radius is only 1/2 of a circle. 1 mile no caches 5 miles 16 caches - found them all + 3 are mine 10 miles 28 caches - found them all @ 11 miles the is one cache that has never been found by anyone GCA8C8 50 miles 150 caches - found 89 of them - in 2 different states 100 miles 844 caches - found 122 of them - in 3 different states Quote Link to comment
+FtMgAl Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 Not too sure where everyone is getting their math for a 25 mile radius. I believe the formula for area of a circle is 2 (PI) r or in this case 2x25x3.14 or about 157 square miles. 2(PI)R is to calculate the circumference of a circle with a given radius. (PI)R² is for the area of a circle with a given radius. And if we want to get real picky we could determine an arc with a length of 25 miles on an earth sized sphere, then scribe a circle around the midpoint at that distance and calculate the surface area enclosed on the sphere. That would encompass slightly more than a 25 mile radius circle on a two dimensional plane. And if we wanted to get super-picky we could estimate elevation changes within the bounds of the scribed area which would again increase the surface area. I believe fractal math would prove that the area becomes infinite as the size of each piece surveyed approaches zero. But if someone wants to point out that the earth is actually an elipsoid... I'm not even going there. I think I'll stick with my original "about 2000 square miles" because it still means caches are few and far between around here. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.