Rating Caches For Coolness

[Grimstone]

I was thinking about so many people getting upset over lame caches and thought there might be a solution.

Not a 100% effective, foolproof method solution, but something that might help.

 

How about we devise some sort of rating system for each cache posted? Only people who have found the cache can rate it. And it would be some sort of rating that would give an idea of how well-put-together and planned the cache was. And if its being maintained, etc....

I know, the comments posted should give an idea of that, but I dont always want to read 20 postings to get a general idea of something that might not even be addressed by any of the cachers, anyway.

 

The ratings would directly reflect on the cache owner's profile page.

 

And say, in order to prevent newbs (like myself) from throwing out 1's or 10's (whatever the rating system is) only cachers who have found over 50 or 100 or whatever caches can post ratings of caches they have found.

 

Either way, it seems there needs to be some sort specific, direct method of rating caches.

 

What does everyone think?

Edited December 11, 2004 by Grimstone

[+Harrald]

I guess when you searched you missed the thread about this already.

 

Cache Rating System, Rate a cache when you log it!?

[Grimstone]

I guess when you searched you missed the thread about this already.

 

Cache Rating System, Rate a cache when you log it!?

 

yegah. thats a newb for you!

 

nvmd....

 

 

 

;

;

;

;

;

;

;

;

;

;

Edited December 11, 2004 by Grimstone