Jump to content

Terrain ratings


Divine

Recommended Posts

I read some earlier forum threads about rating the terrain at your cache. What I have learned is that the ratings can be both regional and relative, which is pretty obvious when you think about it. Still, I've been wondering what would be the proper way to rate the terrain when there's more than one obvious routes leading to the cache, but the difficulty of those routes vary a lot.

 

Of course, in my own caches I've explained the nature of different route options in the cache page when needed. But I'm pondering particularly the Clayjar's star rating on the top of the cache page in this case.

 

Examples:

- 2 routes leading to the cache, the 1st is less than half a mile up/down a very steep cliffs, and the 2nd is e.g. 3 miles on a basic forest path.

 

- Cache is very easy at winter when you can walk straight to the spot across the ice (**), but very difficult in summer with a steep cliff route (****) or having to have a boat (special equipment -> *****). Example.

 

- Cache is at very easy terrain (*), but you have to have a boat in order to get to the spot (spec. eq. -> *****).

 

Should the starts always be rated using the hardest possible route option? Or easiest? Should cache owner change the rating when the seasons change?

 

Markwells are welcome. As wells as comments from Markwell himself.icon_smile.gif

 

- All you need is a sick mind and a healthy body. -

Link to comment

Interesting. Having done 3/4 of all my finds the hard way, I've only ever rated them the way I intend the finder to go.

 

At this point I'd still do it the same. If I rate something a 1/1 and you are bushwacking something is wrong.

 

The summer winter ice/boat thing is best handled with a note. We have caches that state "The rating is for summer conditions" which when you get to the spot means something.

 

After this rambling note the answer is like every other geocaching answer. "It depends on the cache".

 

Wherever you go there you are.

Link to comment

I always rate the route for someone using the hardest route possible. I guess thats because I always seem to follow that route myself. If you rate the terrain for the hardest route you won't get anyone whining about you underestimating the difficulty of the route. You may get someone giving you a bad time for over-rating the difficulty factor though. You can't win.

 

Lost? Keep going. You're making good time anyway!!

Link to comment

I attempted to search for the thread... but the search function wasn't working for me.

 

Anyway, in the case you mentioned about being easier (or harder) to retrieve in the winter (or other season), go ahead and change the rating.

 

If the cache requires a boat in the summer, but can be accessed on foot in the winter, make it a 5-star in the summer, and 2- or 3-star in the winter.

 

Jamie

 

Now I got the search to work, but still couldn't find the thread I was looking for.

Link to comment

If we were to rate the terrain by the hardest route as Night Stalker suggests all caches should have a rating of 5, and this rating would be meaningless. If you have any imagination you can make the trip to the cache harder. One simple way is to ask the potential cache finder to start walking, canoeing, swimming, or whatever 40 miles from the cache.

 

This would make Dave54’s comments to ignore the rating apply to everything.

 

Concerning Night Stalker’s the comment about whining. Reading comments by several new Geocachers I realize that many of them do not know how to read a simple map, and are completely lost on topographical maps. If they take the harder route, who’s fault is it? To come to the answer Night Stalker arrived at is to cater to the uneducated.

Link to comment

I rate it using the toughest conditions the seeker is likely to find if they park where suggested (I usually place parking coordinates in my cheater).

 

Sometimes conditions are easier and other times a bit harder. Some of my 3.5 rated caches were considerably easier this winter because the swamp froze, making walking a breeze. Same happened to some of my swamp caches this summer because of the drought. In another instance, one of my 3.5 rated caches was considerably harder because of snow and ice on the trails.

 

I don't adjust the ratings seasonally, I just try to rate the terrain by what the seeker will encounter the majority of the time.

 

A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away. -Barry Goldwater

Link to comment

i figure that the finder knows that walking over the ice could make it easier. and the finder ought to know riskier.

 

the only thing i'm quite clear about is that a 1 for terrain means handicapped accessible, and that the need for climbing gear makes it a 5.

 

a 5 on otherwise flat terrain is often a good hint as to location. e.g., islands or cliffs. both ought to be apparent given a little research.

 

it doesn't matter if you get to camp at one or at six. dinner is still at six.

Link to comment

quote:
the only thing i'm quite clear about is that a 1 for terrain means handicapped accessible

 

Unfortunately you're one of the few who is clear about this. I've found countless 1's that were in no way handicap accessable. I've also been on 3.5's that were easy walks in the woods. I wish more people would follow the guidelines.

 

I posted a poll a few months ago and I was surprised that there were a significant number of people who didn't know the "Clayjar" rating system existed, despite the fact that there is a link to it on the hide a cache page.

 

A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away. -Barry Goldwater

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...