Jump to content

Gps For Surveying


Colorado Papa

Recommended Posts

In locating 1/2 dozen BMs this past week that were reported as NOT FOUND by NGS made me wonder as to how long GPS has been used for surveying? Out in the boondocks along US Hwy 285 from Antonito, Colorado to Tres Piedras, New Mexico is the very dim outline of what used to be the Denver-Rio Grande narrow gauge railway. A survey crew installed marks along the railway in 1933.

 

In 1984, another crew came along and installed marks along US 285. They used the railway marks where they could find them, but if they didn't find them, the mark was listed as NOT FOUND. Using my GPSr and the scaled coordinates, I was able to walk right up to the missing mark. I was surprised how close the scaled was to the actual location and initially thought the NGS did a poor search job.

 

But then it occurred to me that they had a very poor description, especially since the railway was hard to distinguish in most locations. There were no mile posts or telephone poles, bridges gone, cuts and fill erroded away... They were lucky to find the ones they did!

Here's what they had to put up with (GM0500)!

884d0dec-35c7-415c-bbf5-ed251abb9fe1.jpg

 

Ah, modern inventions. Sheez, GPS would sure have made my Korean flying days a lot easier. I would have known what rice paddy I was blowing up.

 

Edit to add picture.

Edited by Colorado Papa
Link to comment

Since the 1980's. I doubt NGS gives their crews hand held GPSr. We had to buy our own early on, supervisors considered them toys and would not approve. Was not until about 2000 that they gave me a credit card and let me purchase what I needed.

 

We did our first GPS project at the DOT back in 1992. Back then we only had 4 Ashtech receivers for the whole state. In 2001 we spent about 1/2 million from FHWA and outfitted all our crews with 3 Leica SR500 RTK rcvr and installed our our CORS system.

 

I have figured out that NGS does not seem to want to find all the marks at times. They ran levels in this area in 1985. Some marks they report as not found are easy to find which makes me wonder if they even looked for the marks. Their survey require them loop to all marks within 1-2 km of the level line. Finding it means more work. Granted this is just conjecture on my part. It could also be that they use temp help and some of these may lack the skill or the desire to look very hard for them. I recall one highway project we had where many of the marks from 1948 were not found by the USGS in the 1980's. We found everyone and they were not that hard.

 

example of one in plain sight..

RL0474  HISTORY    - Date    Condition        Report By

RL0474  HISTORY    - UNK      MONUMENTED      MIGS

RL0474  HISTORY    - 1948    GOOD            NGS

RL0474  HISTORY    - 1985    MARK NOT FOUND  NGS

RL0474  HISTORY    - 20010606 GOOD            MIDT

RL0474

RL0474                          STATION DESCRIPTION

RL0474

RL0474'DESCRIBED BY NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY 1948

RL0474'IN COVINGTON.

RL0474'IN COVINGTON, IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE CROSSING OF THE

RL0474'DULUTH, SOUTH SHORE AND ATLANTIC RAILWAY AND U.S. HIGHWAY 141,

RL0474'131 FEET WEST AND ACROSS THE HIGHWAY FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER

RL0474'OF THE RAILROAD STATION, 50 FEET WEST OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE

RL0474'HIGHWAY, 25 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH RAIL, 24 FEET WEST-SOUTHWEST

RL0474'OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE CONCRETE BASE OF A SIGNAL SWITCH

RL0474'BOX, 1 FOOT NORTH OF A WHITE WOODEN WITNESS POST, ABOUT 1 FOOT

RL0474'BELOW THE TRACK AND IN THE TOP OF A CONCRETE POST ABOUT FLUSH

RL0474'WITH THE GROUND.

RL0474

RL0474                          STATION RECOVERY (1985)

RL0474

RL0474'RECOVERY NOTE BY NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY 1985

RL0474'MARK NOT FOUND.

RL0474

RL0474                          STATION RECOVERY (2001)

RL0474

RL0474'RECOVERY NOTE BY MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2001 (MPR)

RL0474'IN COVINGTON, IN THE SW CORNER OF INTERSECTION OF US-141 AND RAILROAD

RL0474'TRACKS, 61 FT W OF C/L US-141, 25 FT S OF S RAIL, 24 FT WSW OF SW

RL0474'CORNER OF CONCRETE BASE FOR INACTIVE RR SIGNAL, 20 FT NW OF UTILITY

RL0474'POLE, 2.7 FT SW OF UTILITY POLE ANCHOR CABLE, 0.9 FT S OF A WITNESS

RL0474'POST, FLUSH WITH THE GROUND AND ABOUT 1 FT LOWER THAN HIGHWAY, A

RL0474'SURVEY DISK IN SQUARE CONCRETE POST.

 

Edited by elcamino
Link to comment

My first GPS project was in the winter of 1983-1984. We set the concrete monuments in November and December. The GPS work was contracted out to a company called GeoHydro. The head of the company was formerly the head of NGS.

 

The antennas were huge things that looked like a metal plane table about 3 foot square with an antenna in the center covered by a clear plastic dome. The rest of the receiver completely filled the back end of a full size station wagon. It drew so much power that you had to keep the vehicle running, which was not a problem since it was February. I think that we got the results around May 1984 so this thing was of no use in navigating to a mark.

 

Since NOAA has commissioned officers in the NOAA Corps they may have had access to military receivers if they existed at the time.

Link to comment

a photo from that 1992 survey for highway bypass, sorry they are rather large but I don't ahve time to resize them...

 

5.jpg

 

and the Ashtec receivers (note-the were miltiary grade)

 

6.jpg

 

and the modern Leica is one small package...

 

MVC-001F.JPG

Edited by elcamino
Link to comment

Colorado Papa:

 

A fellow Pilot !!!!!!! I was an Army Aviator (CWO2, Huey Helicopters) in the early 70's. At that time we had VOR and ADF and some of us even had DME on board. I was hearing rumble of giving us LORAN navigation but never saw it myself.

 

In 1996, I decided to get back into flying and was surprised to find TWO GPS units on board.

 

"These times, they are a-changing"

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...