+LeoGeo Posted August 31, 2004 Share Posted August 31, 2004 CS2841 was a water tank described as an intersection station in the 1940s and 1950s. There is a water tank on the same lot today, but it's not the same tank; it was replaced at some time in the recent past. Is CS2841 "destroyed," then? The station was the "center of the tank;" and the center of the current tank is not necessarily at precisely the same location as the center of the documented one. Quote Link to comment
+Black Dog Trackers Posted August 31, 2004 Share Posted August 31, 2004 Yes, if it isn't the same water tank, then CS2841 should be marked Destroyed in your log. A picture of the new tank would be great if you could take one and post it. The NGS would want a picture too, if you decide to report the PID to them. Quote Link to comment
+Kewaneh & Shark Posted August 31, 2004 Share Posted August 31, 2004 If you are certain that the tank has been replaced with a newer one, then yes, it could be considered destroyed. The newer tank could also be somewhat considered a 'RESET'. Reset marks are not always placed in the same location as the originals. - Kewaneh Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.