+pdxmarathonman Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 I love hearing about elected officials who understand what their jobs are and are serious about it! I am sure it would have been easy for him to go along with those who wish to ban uses of open spaces.
+Wyoming Travelers Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 (edited) Very typical of Boulder County, The problem is there are so many great caches in this area for example check out:Well nevermind, because geocaching.com if not up. The thing is Boulder county covers a lot of ground to include, Lafayette, Superior, Louisville, and Niwot to name a few. Open Space abounds in the area. Most all of the caches I have been to in Boulder County open space, are not more than a 4 meters from the trail. Boulder has a reputation of going to extreme measures to protect flora and fauna in this county, however, this seems like a knee-jerk reaction if ever there was one. I currently live in Adams County which borders Boulder county, and my next cache will definately be in Adams. P.S. my avitar is taken in Boulder County, I better erase it before the Boulder Law comes looking for me, for as you can plainly see I am not on the trail Everyone, its easy to take shots. I am requesting that it stop. THis is not helpful to the concept of keeping Geocaching in Boulder county. The meeting is tomorrow at 2:pm. lets wait and see what happens Please. With all due respect, please don't attempt to censor me. Edited September 1, 2004 by Cwiggum
+jeff35080 Posted September 1, 2004 Author Posted September 1, 2004 I love my job. We're glad you love your job because hopefully you have saved geocaching in the area! Congrats from the deep south! Please keep us posted of the forthcoming discussions!
+Spencersb Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Way to go CO! This is how the process should work! All sides getting together and reasoning out a good, common sense solution! You da man! (I think...didn't we cover that gender thing in the forums a month or so ago?)
+briansnat Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Very typical of Boulder County, The problem is there are so many great caches in this area for example check out:Well nevermind, because geocaching.com if not up. The thing is Boulder county covers a lot of ground to include, Lafayette, Superior, Louisville, and Niwot to name a few. Open Space abounds in the area. Most all of the caches I have been to in Boulder County open space, are not more than a 4 meters from the trail. Boulder has a reputation of going to extreme measures to protect flora and fauna in this county, however, this seems like a knee-jerk reaction if ever there was one. I currently live in Adams County which borders Boulder county, and my next cache will definately be in Adams. P.S. my avitar is taken in Boulder County, I better erase it before the Boulder Law comes looking for me, for as you can plainly see I am not on the trail Everyone, its easy to take shots. I am requesting that it stop. THis is not helpful to the concept of keeping Geocaching in Boulder county. The meeting is tomorrow at 2:pm. lets wait and see what happens Please. With all due respect, please don't attempt to censor me. With all due respect, this is a moderated forum and it is the moderator's job to to rebuke, admonish or censor as he sees fit.
+AtoZ Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 WOOT COAdmin thank you for your POSITIVE attitude and SUPPORT. WOOT I I live just S. of Boulder County and it was going to be a real shame if they had banned Geocaching. I mean Open space is there to be used. Is it possible to send some positive affirmation to the commissionar to let him knew there are thankful people out there. Again THANK COAdimn. Cheers
+CO Admin Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 WOOT COAdmin thank you for your POSITIVE attitude and SUPPORT. WOOT I I live just S. of Boulder County and it was going to be a real shame if they had banned Geocaching. I mean Open space is there to be used. Is it possible to send some positive affirmation to the commissionar to let him knew there are thankful people out there. Again THANK COAdimn.Cheers Ill see if I can get that information for you
+cameltrekor Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 (edited) ... Is it possible to send some positive affirmation to the commissionar to let him knew there are thankful people out there. His name is Paul Danish. You can find him at this site. I was at the meeting too, and was pleasantly impressed with his comments abuout having open space to use. The proposed working group for geocaching in Boulder County should be open for everyone and I hope that other geocaching users participate in this for it will format what is allowed in this county for a long time to come. Edited September 1, 2004 by cameltrekor
+CO Admin Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 (edited) Todays article on yesterdays meeting. Thank you Boulder County commissioners Edited September 1, 2004 by CO Admin
Tahosa and Sons Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Congrats to the Pink Pony and Camel. Your input was really appreciated.
+CO Admin Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Congrats to the Pink Pony and Camel. Your input was really appreciated. ITS PURPLE!!!!!!!!!
+bradtal Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Way to go guys! Special thanks to the "PURPLE " Pony for representing all of us geocachers. I appreciate you taking the time to represent us and the fact that you were able to walk away with a victory. It's almost like a "David vs. Goliath" story. Hopefully this will open some doors to those that have "closed out" geocaching in their communities. Now for a poem... Way to go Admin, CO! Brad
+Smitherington Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Congratulations and thanks for a job well done. Or at least started. Hang in there.
+wolf452 Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Hm. They don't make it clear what "Boulder County Open Space" is. I can't think of county-owned parks anywhere that I'm familiar with. City or town, states or federal, and privately-managed trusts are all I know, and I can't think how county commissioners could dictate what goes on there. Sounds to me like that's a specific area or land management scheme. It's still a bad thing, of course. Summary of Public Open Space Properties Property Fairgrounds Park Rabbit Mountain Open Space Lagerman Reservoir Walden Ponds Wildlife Habitat Legion Park Rock Creek Farm Walker Ranch Betasso Preserve Bald Mountain Scenic Area Pella Crossing Beech Open Space Hall Ranch Heil Valley Ranch Niwot Loop Trail Coal Creek Trail
+pdxmarathonman Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 (edited) My favorite word in that whole article was: unanimous. As soon as the park rangers realize that there is less trash in their open spaces because we're there they'll be a happier set of campers. CITO on! edit: I know it isn't their open space, but you get my drift Looks like room for at least 8 more caches in Boulder County Edited September 1, 2004 by pdxmarathonman
jedihound Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Good news!!! I just got into the game, and seeing that article in the Daily Camera on monday bummed me out... Thanks for your work for us CO_Admin!
Nervous Nick Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 I forwarded the article to my sister who lives outside of Boulder. Here is the wee exchange (my sister is quoted); >Typical Boulder Nazism. > The only good thing is that it will be almost impossible to enforce. How > are they going to prove your out looking for or hiding a cache? That gives me an idea, Sis! If someone approaches you while you are caching, and asks what the heck you are doing, just totally deadpan (if this would be at all possible to deadpan): Be vewwy vewwy quiet. We're hunting ELMERS.
MOCKBA Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 I don't think it's really so good news. When they finally come up with their system of rules and permissions, it'd probably require every future cache to have an annual permit with steep registration and renewal fees, with restrictions still outlawing caches in most of their area, and with a bond posting requirement... In any case it's good to see CO's mood brighten, so thanks commissioners at least for that.
+Wyoming Travelers Posted September 2, 2004 Posted September 2, 2004 Very typical of Boulder County, The problem is there are so many great caches in this area for example check out:Well nevermind, because geocaching.com if not up. The thing is Boulder county covers a lot of ground to include, Lafayette, Superior, Louisville, and Niwot to name a few. Open Space abounds in the area. Most all of the caches I have been to in Boulder County open space, are not more than a 4 meters from the trail. Boulder has a reputation of going to extreme measures to protect flora and fauna in this county, however, this seems like a knee-jerk reaction if ever there was one. I currently live in Adams County which borders Boulder county, and my next cache will definately be in Adams. P.S. my avitar is taken in Boulder County, I better erase it before the Boulder Law comes looking for me, for as you can plainly see I am not on the trail Everyone, its easy to take shots. I am requesting that it stop. THis is not helpful to the concept of keeping Geocaching in Boulder county. The meeting is tomorrow at 2:pm. lets wait and see what happens Please. With all due respect, please don't attempt to censor me. With all due respect, this is a moderated forum and it is the moderator's job to to rebuke, admonish or censor as he sees fit. I believe you may want to review the forum guidelines prior to determining the moderators function within the forums. I have provided a link for you. http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?act=boardrules
+LordSaw Posted September 2, 2004 Posted September 2, 2004 (edited) QUOTE (Cwiggum @ Aug 31 2004, 08:41 PM) (CO Admin @ Aug 30 2004, 05:34 PM) (Cwiggum @ Aug 30 2004, 05:29 PM) Very typical of Boulder County, The problem is there are so many great caches in this area for example check out: Well nevermind, because geocaching.com if not up. The thing is Boulder county covers a lot of ground to include, Lafayette, Superior, Louisville, and Niwot to name a few. Open Space abounds in the area. Most all of the caches I have been to in Boulder County open space, are not more than a 4 meters from the trail. Boulder has a reputation of going to extreme measures to protect flora and fauna in this county, however, this seems like a knee-jerk reaction if ever there was one. I currently live in Adams County which borders Boulder county, and my next cache will definately be in Adams. P.S. my avitar is taken in Boulder County, I better erase it before the Boulder Law comes looking for me, for as you can plainly see I am not on the trail Everyone, its easy to take shots. I am requesting that it stop. THis is not helpful to the concept of keeping Geocaching in Boulder county. The meeting is tomorrow at 2:pm. lets wait and see what happens Please. With all due respect, please don't attempt to censor me. I refrained from replying to the original post as someone already had. But now I will throw in my two cents. CO Admin did not attempt to censor you as you stated. He politely asked you to not make cheap shots about the Boulder County administration and wait for the results of the upcoming meeting. Your comments did nothing to help him prepare for his meeting and if they had been read by any of the opposing side or administration, could have increased the difficulty he would have in convincing the administration to defeat the proposed ban. Thank you for your understanding of the difference in requesting restraint and censorship. And Cache Well Edited September 2, 2004 by LordSaw
+evergreenhiker! Posted September 2, 2004 Posted September 2, 2004 Good luck CO! Good luck man! Moun10Bike and I had discussed this area some time back. I was at the time corresponding wiht a lady down in Boulder and was checking into caches in that area and most were virts so he mentioned that Boulder county had a problem with boxes.
+CO Admin Posted September 2, 2004 Posted September 2, 2004 I don't think it's really so good news. When they finally come up with their system of rules and permissions, it'd probably require every future cache to have an annual permit with steep registration and renewal fees, with restrictions still outlawing caches in most of their area, and with a bond posting requirement... In any case it's good to see CO's mood brighten, so thanks commissioners at least for that. Have Faith little one. I just finished a permit system in another county that is as close to perfect as you can get and still have a permit. Keep the faith, Think the good thoughts.
+hydee Posted September 2, 2004 Posted September 2, 2004 Very typical of Boulder County, The problem is there are so many great caches in this area for example check out:Well nevermind, because geocaching.com if not up. The thing is Boulder county covers a lot of ground to include, Lafayette, Superior, Louisville, and Niwot to name a few. Open Space abounds in the area. Most all of the caches I have been to in Boulder County open space, are not more than a 4 meters from the trail. Boulder has a reputation of going to extreme measures to protect flora and fauna in this county, however, this seems like a knee-jerk reaction if ever there was one. I currently live in Adams County which borders Boulder county, and my next cache will definately be in Adams. P.S. my avitar is taken in Boulder County, I better erase it before the Boulder Law comes looking for me, for as you can plainly see I am not on the trail Everyone, its easy to take shots. I am requesting that it stop. THis is not helpful to the concept of keeping Geocaching in Boulder county. The meeting is tomorrow at 2:pm. lets wait and see what happens Please. With all due respect, please don't attempt to censor me. With all due respect, this is a moderated forum and it is the moderator's job to to rebuke, admonish or censor as he sees fit. I believe you may want to review the forum guidelines prior to determining the moderators function within the forums. I have provided a link for you. http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?act=boardrules Actually CO assisted me in writing the guidelines so I would say he has a strong grasp of their wording. There was no censorship in his post to you or there would be a 'edited by....' line from where he removed text. Oh by the way thanks CO Admin you did a great job today!
+briansnat Posted September 2, 2004 Posted September 2, 2004 (edited) With all due respect, please don't attempt to censor me. With all due respect, this is a moderated forum and it is the moderator's job to to rebuke, admonish or censor as he sees fit. I believe you may want to review the forum guidelines prior to determining the moderators function within the forums. I have provided a link for you. http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?act=boardrules From the linked to guidelines: ...This means that we (Groundspeak and the volunteers for Groundspeak) reserve the right to edit/remove inappropriate messages... From the Dictionary: Main Entry: censor Function: transitive verb Inflected Form(s): cen·sored; cen·sor·ing /'sen(t)-s&-ri[ng], 'sen(t)s-ri[ng]/ : to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable Now I have a feeling I'm about to be rebuked or admonished by Mr. CO Admin and/or Hydee for taking this thread off topic and they may go as far as censoring me if they find my post to be particularly objectionable. Edited September 2, 2004 by briansnat
+Wyoming Travelers Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 With all due respect, please don't attempt to censor me. With all due respect, this is a moderated forum and it is the moderator's job to to rebuke, admonish or censor as he sees fit. I believe you may want to review the forum guidelines prior to determining the moderators function within the forums. I have provided a link for you. http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?act=boardrules From the linked to guidelines: ...This means that we (Groundspeak and the volunteers for Groundspeak) reserve the right to edit/remove inappropriate messages... From the Dictionary: Main Entry: censor Function: transitive verb Inflected Form(s): cen·sored; cen·sor·ing /'sen(t)-s&-ri[ng], 'sen(t)s-ri[ng]/ : to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable Now I have a feeling I'm about to be rebuked or admonished by Mr. CO Admin and/or Hydee for taking this thread off topic and they may go as far as censoring me if they find my post to be particularly objectionable. You have not shown me where my post was inappropriate. The only thing inappropriate was free thought. I live in Colorado, and I have an opinion regarding Boulder County. You or your counterparts may have a differing opinion, but if you choose to censor other opinions you will be here with only your own thoughts. I believe I have made my point. I will not be posting to this thread going forward. I refer you to text from another message on this forum which could possibly offend people. "I forwarded the article to my sister who lives outside of Boulder. Here is the wee exchange (my sister is quoted); >Typical Boulder Nazism. > The only good thing is that it will be almost impossible to enforce. How > are they going to prove your out looking for or hiding a cache? That gives me an idea, Sis! If someone approaches you while you are caching, and asks what the heck you are doing, just totally deadpan (if this would be at all possible to deadpan): Be vewwy vewwy quiet. We're hunting ELMERS." However, I see no censorship of this post. You are fighting a battle which you know you are wrong. I do not expect you to admit your error, but others will see the error of your way. Good day.
+Wyoming Travelers Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 QUOTE (Cwiggum @ Aug 31 2004, 08:41 PM) (CO Admin @ Aug 30 2004, 05:34 PM) (Cwiggum @ Aug 30 2004, 05:29 PM) Very typical of Boulder County, The problem is there are so many great caches in this area for example check out: Well nevermind, because geocaching.com if not up. The thing is Boulder county covers a lot of ground to include, Lafayette, Superior, Louisville, and Niwot to name a few. Open Space abounds in the area. Most all of the caches I have been to in Boulder County open space, are not more than a 4 meters from the trail. Boulder has a reputation of going to extreme measures to protect flora and fauna in this county, however, this seems like a knee-jerk reaction if ever there was one. I currently live in Adams County which borders Boulder county, and my next cache will definately be in Adams. P.S. my avitar is taken in Boulder County, I better erase it before the Boulder Law comes looking for me, for as you can plainly see I am not on the trail Everyone, its easy to take shots. I am requesting that it stop. THis is not helpful to the concept of keeping Geocaching in Boulder county. The meeting is tomorrow at 2:pm. lets wait and see what happens Please. With all due respect, please don't attempt to censor me. I refrained from replying to the original post as someone already had. But now I will throw in my two cents. CO Admin did not attempt to censor you as you stated. He politely asked you to not make cheap shots about the Boulder County administration and wait for the results of the upcoming meeting. Your comments did nothing to help him prepare for his meeting and if they had been read by any of the opposing side or administration, could have increased the difficulty he would have in convincing the administration to defeat the proposed ban. Thank you for your understanding of the difference in requesting restraint and censorship. And Cache Well Thank your for your comments. I understand your point. However, I also believe that my opinion of Boulder County is of merit. If CO Admin wanted to delete my post that individual holds that power. Clearly they did not find it too terribly offensive, or it would have been removed according to their own guidelines. I do not believe any public forum (Yes I do understand Groundspeak is privately owned) can have any merit if it only allows "me to" thought. Regards
+briansnat Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 (edited) You have not shown me where my post was inappropriate. I don't recall saying anything to that effect. Only that CO Admin has the right to censor, or censure you if he sees fit. You are fighting a battle which you know you are wrong. I do not expect you to admit your error, but others will see the error of your way. Good day. I won't because I'm not. This is a privately owned message board and we post here at the pleasure of the owners and their agents. As such, there is no right to free speech or freedom from censorship here. I'm right and you're wrong, so neeyyyyah . Edited September 3, 2004 by briansnat
+CO Admin Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 You have not shown me where my post was inappropriate. I don't recall saying anything to that effect. Only that CO Admin has the right to censor, or censure you if he sees fit. You are fighting a battle which you know you are wrong. I do not expect you to admit your error, but others will see the error of your way. Good day. I won't because I'm not. This is a privately owned message board and we post here at the pleasure of the owners and their agents. As such, there is no right to free speech or freedom from censorship here. I'm right and you're wrong, so neeyyyyah . a couple of Items: 1: my original request was to EVERYONE not just one person. 2: It was made because some times its best to SHUT UP and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt. 3: In all negotiations it is best to treat the other side with kindness. Look at football game, Pre game interviews. "Well coach How do you think tonights game is going to go, Will you win??". Well, Jane, I feel that our opponent has really had a great week. They seem to really be on their game and its going to be a tough fight. I am sure that at the last whistle the best team will be on top.", "Thanks Coach", "Your welcome Jane." You never see the coach say. "Jane, we are going to Kill those wimps!!!!! they suck and we are going to mop up the field with those rotten *&^*&%#$*%@ers!!" Diplomacy and discretion are the best way to go into a meeting. So to reiterate point #1. my original request was to EVERYONE not just one person. There fore no ONE person should feel they were being singled out as they were not. This will END this part of this thread. it is off topic to the purpose of the thread. if you MUST rant about this subject start a new thread.
+ironman114 Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 2: It was made because some times its best to SHUT UP and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt. This is one of my favorite sayings! I think it applies in the forums very well. Thank you CoAdmin for your work.
+TotemLake Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Todays article on yesterdays meeting. Thank you Boulder County commissioners That's awesome CO! Nice job at turning the tide!
+jeff35080 Posted September 3, 2004 Author Posted September 3, 2004 Since this thread has turned somewhat 'ugly' and I started another thread with the results of the meeting, I'm going to close this thread. Once again, thank you to all the involved parties that worked hard to help save geocaching in this area of the country. Odds are that I'll never make it to Colorado and more specifically Boulder County, but if and when I do I will be glad that some who cared were able to help save geocaching and thus I'll be able to partake of the geocaches placed there on the public lands. Happy geocaching!
Recommended Posts