+Team S-J Posted September 2, 2004 Share Posted September 2, 2004 My only problem with micro caches is they are usually put where a trad cache would be too obvious. But this means micros quite often get trashed as they are found by muggles. However, it's amazing what you can get in a micro and I do smile at the various methods of folding the log books and also in seeing how small you can write with a blunt HB. Quote Link to comment
+roolku Posted September 2, 2004 Share Posted September 2, 2004 but do people feel 'cheated' by micros? Are they a second-class cache? If I go caching away from home I will just ignore them. If they come up on my 'nearest' list I will grudgingly do them. No TBs, no logbook stories, no swaps (depending on size obvioulsly) - IMO definately second class. While the location might make up for those shortcomings it is usually impossible to tell before setting off. Roolku Quote Link to comment
+Team Ullium Posted September 2, 2004 Share Posted September 2, 2004 Team S-J: ....micro caches is they are usually put where a trad cache would be too obvious. One would imagine so Team S-J ???....however, I have experienced quite a number of not only micro caches but some very very small so called 'regular' caches that could quite easily have been replaced by a decent size of container....which makes one wonder if it is a case of 'I've bought it ... so I'll use it' principle that is being applied rather than any location considerations ??? Roolku: No TBs, no logbook stories, no swaps (depending on size obvioulsly) - IMO definately second class. While the location might make up for those shortcomings it is usually impossible to tell before setting off. Exactly my sentiments (see... we can agree on some things ) Ullium. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.