+Skully & Mulder et al. Posted April 17, 2004 Posted April 17, 2004 Answer...A cache that that doesn't travel (but is supposed to). Please check out The Shutterbug Cache (GCB92C) and Shen Ku (GCB78E). I wonder why these have not been rehidden after almost a month in captivity...hmmmmmm?????
+Natureboy44 Posted April 17, 2004 Posted April 17, 2004 (edited) Hopefully there has just been a delay in resetting them. If not, this is unfortunate and I hope consideration of other cachers will prevail. Edited April 17, 2004 by Natureboy44
+HartClimbs Posted April 18, 2004 Posted April 18, 2004 Maybe it's like getting gum on the bottom of your shoe. You just never can get it clean again. Apropos of nothing. Banned users unite.
+avroair Posted April 18, 2004 Posted April 18, 2004 I grabbed both of them. But I think one of them has been retrieved by BP.
Find Now, Log Later? Posted April 18, 2004 Posted April 18, 2004 (edited) Please check out The Shutterbug Cache (GCB92C) and Shen Ku (GCB78E). I wonder why these have not been rehidden after almost a month in captivity...hmmmmmm????? Do you own the caches? Did you, or any of the people who logged the caches during the month they sat in Chatham, make any attempt to move them on? Did you query the individual holding the caches directly? Didn't think so. So don't worry yourself silly now ... I suggest you show the same concern for where the caches have sat the past month that you demonstrated the month previous. As far as you are concerned, there is no difference ... you ignored them then; feel free to continue ignoring them. Edited April 18, 2004 by Bassoon Pilot
+Skully & Mulder et al. Posted April 18, 2004 Author Posted April 18, 2004 I's hard to ignore when they keep popping up when I hit the "Find nearby caches" link. I'm not worrying myself silly - just asking a question. And another thing - I'm not sure who you are but I noticed you have no cache hides or finds so maybe you should find some caches before you start telling us what we should be concerned about.
+Team DEMP Posted April 18, 2004 Posted April 18, 2004 (edited) Shen Ku wants to go to Georgia. I'm heading to NC next week so drop it off close by - I work in Woodcliff Lake Edited April 18, 2004 by Team DEMP
+HartClimbs Posted April 19, 2004 Posted April 19, 2004 Please check out The Shutterbug Cache (GCB92C) and Shen Ku (GCB78E). I wonder why these have not been rehidden after almost a month in captivity...hmmmmmm????? Do you own the caches? Did you, or any of the people who logged the caches during the month they sat in Chatham, make any attempt to move them on? Did you query the individual holding the caches directly? Didn't think so. So don't worry yourself silly now ... I suggest you show the same concern for where the caches have sat the past month that you demonstrated the month previous. As far as you are concerned, there is no difference ... you ignored them then; feel free to continue ignoring them. I don't own 'em - and didn't move 'em when I found 'em either, but there *were* in the public domain and findable by other cachers. Of course, sitting in the trunk of someone's car - the caches aren't available to anyone. Hey - it's a free country. Find 'em, take 'em, keep 'em...... it's your call - but it's certainly reasonable for people to ask questions about what you're intending to do. Hope you're having fun regardless (and I think the banning thing's silly anyway).
Find Now, Log Later? Posted April 19, 2004 Posted April 19, 2004 (edited) Of course, sitting in the trunk of someone's car - the caches aren't available to anyone. The question posed in the opening post of this thread was in reference to "traveling caches that don't travel (but are supposed to.)" That description describes the month the caches sat in Chatham exactly. "Cache availability" was not part of the question. it's certainly reasonable for people to ask questions about what you're intending to do. There is a high probability that our definitions of "reasonable" differ markedly. The question was posed to the general community via "the public domain." As is the case with most forum threads, this thread demonstrates that responses from parties not directly involved amount to, at best, mere speculation. That's sort of like using Roto-Rooter to perform an angioplasty. I presume that if someone had a genuine concern about the caches, they would have contacted me directly via PM or e-mail. Certainly, such an inquiry would have been "reasonable." No one made such an inquiry. So enjoy your speculation. Who knows; perhaps as a group you'll arrive at a consensus regarding my intentions and then you can get those caches moving again. There's only one problem ... Edited April 19, 2004 by Bassoon Pilot
+Skully & Mulder et al. Posted April 19, 2004 Author Posted April 19, 2004 I'd like to close this topic - I don't think it is doing anybody any good. It's my fault for starting it.
Recommended Posts