+Team Ferret Posted February 8, 2004 Share Posted February 8, 2004 We were looking at caches in another area we are thinking if visiting. We usually read a few of the logs to see what people think of the caches. We came across a few cachers, with high find counts(We know, some say that doesn't matter), that claim "Found" for caches that are missing, but they found the area the cache was in. We once came across a cache that was missing and logged "Unfound". The owner emailed us, asking to describe the area. After we email our description, he said that we were in the right place and we could change our log to "Found". We decided to wait until the cache was replaced, found it, then we log it as "Found". We have never logged a cache as being found when it was missing. We were just wondering how everyone else feels about this? Would you claim a missing cache as found if you were at the right spot (and even if he cache owner said it was ok), or would you rather claim unfound? Mark & Terre (We did do a search to see if this has been posted before. Didn't find anything, so we hoping we are not bringing up an old subject) Quote Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.