+SpongeRob Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 I found something similar to the following and decided to make a "Geocaching" specific one Q: How many forum posters does it take to hide a geocache? Answers: 1 to hide the geocache and to post that the geocache has been hidden. 14 to share similar experiences of geocaching and how the geocache could have been hidden differently 7 to caution about the dangers of hiding a geocache in such a location 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about geocaching 41 to correct spelling/grammar flames 6 to argue over whether it's geocache or geocaching another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive 53 to ask if the geocache has indeed been hidden 27 to post URL's where one can see examples of different geocaches 12 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the geocache controversy 4 to suggest that posters request they read Markwells FAQ 44 to ask what is a "FAQ" 2 to post reasons why the geocaching is the result of a Groundspeak conspiracy. 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 43 to say "do a Google search on hiding geocaches" and finally 1 lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again Quote Link to comment
+Sparky-Watts Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 Very good....and very true! But you forgot about the one wet cat to post something stupid and totally off-topic which will start a flame war about too many posts and not enough finds to be qualified to post in the forums...... Quote Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 Don't forget: 3 to complain that traditionals get preference over virtuals 15 to explain that geocaching was designed around finding a container and that sightseeing historical markers is allowed on waypoint.org Quote Link to comment
+Halden Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 2 to commit Geocide (one will return shortly) Quote Link to comment
+Criminal Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 ...and one to markwell to a previous thread.... Quote Link to comment
+The Leprechauns Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 .... like maybe Markwelling to this one? Quote Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 .... like maybe Markwelling to this one? Good 'ol Jomarac5...always good for a laugh Quote Link to comment
+Sparky-Watts Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 .... like maybe Markwelling to this one? Good 'ol Jomarac5...always good for a laugh Isn't he up for parole soon? Quote Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 .... like maybe Markwelling to this one? Good 'ol Jomarac5...always good for a laugh Isn't he up for parole soon? I think he's serving out his sentence on Woody's site Quote Link to comment
+Renegade Knight Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 All that and nobody found the cache. Quote Link to comment
+Dagg Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 I think J5 is back around mid Feb. We should have homecoming party Quote Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 I think J5 is back around mid Feb. We should have homecoming party It won't last long, he'll get banned again. Quote Link to comment
uperdooper Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 may i have a link to woody's site please. if not here, email is fine. Quote Link to comment
+carleenp Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 may i have a link to woody's site please. if not here, email is fine. Woodsters Quote Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 Woodsters Quote Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 I've got to watch out for that Carleen person...she just pops up out of nowhere! Quote Link to comment
+JMBella Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 2 to say that geocaches shouldn't be hidden in the wilderness. Quote Link to comment
uperdooper Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 thank-you for the link. 1 who can't figure out yet how to get her stats to show up on her posts. Quote Link to comment
+JMBella Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 (edited) thank-you for the link. 1 who can't figure out yet how to get her stats to show up on her posts. try this... http://www.geocaching.com/stats/img.aspx?u...txt=stats]click Edited January 29, 2004 by JMBella Quote Link to comment
+GrizzlyJohn Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 1 to mod and tell us to get back on topic. and 1 to kick up the warn meter for those that got out of hand. and finally 1 to close the topic after all attempts to keep in line have failed. Quote Link to comment
uperdooper Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 thank-you for the link. 1 who can't figure out yet how to get her stats to show up on her posts. http://www.geocaching.com/stats/img.aspx?u...txt=stats]click i know what it would look like. i just can't figure out how to do it at the keenpeople web site. briefly braindead i hope. Quote Link to comment
+JMBella Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 You'd have to paste the code in every post. You can't have an image in your sig line. I'm not sure if that's what you're talking about. Perhaps it's me that's brain dead. In fact I'm sure it is. Just trying to help. Quote Link to comment
uperdooper Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 You'd have to paste the code in every post. You can't have an image in your sig line. I'm not sure if that's what you're talking about. Perhaps it's me that's brain dead. In fact I'm sure it is. Just trying to help. nope, it's me. i didn't know that it would have to be pasted in every post. too much work to do. all that paste gets sticky anyway. thanks. Quote Link to comment
Colonel Mustard Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 You forgot the 23 flame the approver posters coz it wasn't approved on the first go around. Quote Link to comment
+GrizzlyJohn Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 You forgot the 23 flame the approver posters coz it wasn't approved on the first go around. And then the 46 posts that will link to the guidelines. I can see this could go on and may not end anytime soon. Quote Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 You forgot the 23 flame the approver posters coz it wasn't approved on the first go around. And then the 46 posts that will link to the guidelines. I can see this could go on and may not end anytime soon. And those of us that will tell you to hide a real cache Quote Link to comment
+GrizzlyJohn Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 And those of us that will tell you to hide a real cache Quote Link to comment
+crzycrzy Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 12 Cache complainers 11 Closed topics 10 Lurkers posting 9 off topic posters 8 warn meters increasing 7 to ask if anyone saw small farm animals... 6 to ask what type of GPS to buy... 5------------ Golden caches------------- 4 Calling birds 3 french hens 2 turtle doves and a virtual in a tree ! Quote Link to comment
+JMBella Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 (edited) 12 Cache complainers11 Closed topics 10 Lurkers posting 9 off topic posters 8 warn meters increasing 7 to ask if anyone saw small farm animals... 6 to ask what type of GPS to buy... 5------------ Golden caches------------- 4 Calling birds 3 french hens 2 turtle doves and a virtual in a tree ! Hey. You could easily have placed a micro in that tree dammit! (Posting here in an attempt to bury the "Wilderness thread" Won't you help? Please post once in any other thread other than the wilderness thread. Make it go away. Please help me.) Edited January 30, 2004 by JMBella Quote Link to comment
+Navdog Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 How many forum posters does it take to hide a geocache? Didn't you forget about the one forums poster that insists permission be asked? Quote Link to comment
+The Cheeseheads Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 I found something similar to the following and decided to make a "Geocaching" specific one Q: How many forum posters does it take to hide a geocache? Answers: 1 to hide the geocache and to post that the geocache has been hidden. 14 to share similar experiences of geocaching and how the geocache could have been hidden differently 7 to caution about the dangers of hiding a geocache in such a location 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about geocaching 41 to correct spelling/grammar flames 6 to argue over whether it's geocache or geocaching another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive 53 to ask if the geocache has indeed been hidden 27 to post URL's where one can see examples of different geocaches 12 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the geocache controversy 4 to suggest that posters request they read Markwells FAQ 44 to ask what is a "FAQ" 2 to post reasons why the geocaching is the result of a Groundspeak conspiracy. 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 43 to say "do a Google search on hiding geocaches" and finally 1 lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again 1 poster to needleesly quote someone's entire post instead of snipping out the irrelevant bits. Quote Link to comment
cutsandbruises Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 10 to post just to post, so their post counts go up and they can be the ones on the top 10 posters list!!! Whew say that 3 times in a row fast Quote Link to comment
WH Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 1 to post a reply thats totally off topic. Pine cones make the worst toilet paper while caching.....what does everyone else think? Quote Link to comment
+Sparky-Watts Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 I found something similar to the following and decided to make a "Geocaching" specific one Q: How many forum posters does it take to hide a geocache? Answers: 1 to hide the geocache and to post that the geocache has been hidden. 14 to share similar experiences of geocaching and how the geocache could have been hidden differently 7 to caution about the dangers of hiding a geocache in such a location 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about geocaching 41 to correct spelling/grammar flames 6 to argue over whether it's geocache or geocaching another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive 53 to ask if the geocache has indeed been hidden 27 to post URL's where one can see examples of different geocaches 12 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the geocache controversy 4 to suggest that posters request they read Markwells FAQ 44 to ask what is a "FAQ" 2 to post reasons why the geocaching is the result of a Groundspeak conspiracy. 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 43 to say "do a Google search on hiding geocaches" and finally 1 lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again 1 poster to needleesly quote someone's entire post instead of snipping out the irrelevant bits. Two posters to start a nesting quote war! Quote Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 10 to post just to post, so their post counts go up and they can be the ones on the top 10 posters list!!! Whew say that 3 times in a row fast I suppose those of us that are already on the list just post to stay there? sheesh Quote Link to comment
+The Cheeseheads Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 I found something similar to the following and decided to make a "Geocaching" specific one Q: How many forum posters does it take to hide a geocache? Answers: 1 to hide the geocache and to post that the geocache has been hidden. 14 to share similar experiences of geocaching and how the geocache could have been hidden differently 7 to caution about the dangers of hiding a geocache in such a location 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about geocaching 41 to correct spelling/grammar flames 6 to argue over whether it's geocache or geocaching another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive 53 to ask if the geocache has indeed been hidden 27 to post URL's where one can see examples of different geocaches 12 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the geocache controversy 4 to suggest that posters request they read Markwells FAQ 44 to ask what is a "FAQ" 2 to post reasons why the geocaching is the result of a Groundspeak conspiracy. 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 43 to say "do a Google search on hiding geocaches" and finally 1 lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again 1 poster to needleesly quote someone's entire post instead of snipping out the irrelevant bits. Two posters to start a nesting quote war! 1 poster to keep the lame joke going... Quote Link to comment
+Sparky-Watts Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 I found something similar to the following and decided to make a "Geocaching" specific one Q: How many forum posters does it take to hide a geocache? Answers: 1 to hide the geocache and to post that the geocache has been hidden. 14 to share similar experiences of geocaching and how the geocache could have been hidden differently 7 to caution about the dangers of hiding a geocache in such a location 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about geocaching 41 to correct spelling/grammar flames 6 to argue over whether it's geocache or geocaching another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive 53 to ask if the geocache has indeed been hidden 27 to post URL's where one can see examples of different geocaches 12 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the geocache controversy 4 to suggest that posters request they read Markwells FAQ 44 to ask what is a "FAQ" 2 to post reasons why the geocaching is the result of a Groundspeak conspiracy. 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 43 to say "do a Google search on hiding geocaches" and finally 1 lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again 1 poster to needleesly quote someone's entire post instead of snipping out the irrelevant bits. Two posters to start a nesting quote war! 1 poster to keep the lame joke going... One to ask, "Who are you calling lame?" Quote Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 (edited) One to get kicked out of Wisconsin for abusing the cat (Honest officer, I was just giving it a bath...) Edited January 30, 2004 by Team GPSaxophone Quote Link to comment
+The Cheeseheads Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 I found something similar to the following and decided to make a "Geocaching" specific one Q: How many forum posters does it take to hide a geocache? Answers: 1 to hide the geocache and to post that the geocache has been hidden. 14 to share similar experiences of geocaching and how the geocache could have been hidden differently 7 to caution about the dangers of hiding a geocache in such a location 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about geocaching 41 to correct spelling/grammar flames 6 to argue over whether it's geocache or geocaching another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive 53 to ask if the geocache has indeed been hidden 27 to post URL's where one can see examples of different geocaches 12 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the geocache controversy 4 to suggest that posters request they read Markwells FAQ 44 to ask what is a "FAQ" 2 to post reasons why the geocaching is the result of a Groundspeak conspiracy. 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 43 to say "do a Google search on hiding geocaches" and finally 1 lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again 1 poster to needleesly quote someone's entire post instead of snipping out the irrelevant bits. Two posters to start a nesting quote war! 1 poster to keep the lame joke going... One to ask, "Who are you calling lame?" 1 to accuse someone of having 100 times more forum posts than finds... Quote Link to comment
+Sparky-Watts Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 I found something similar to the following and decided to make a "Geocaching" specific one Q: How many forum posters does it take to hide a geocache? Answers: 1 to hide the geocache and to post that the geocache has been hidden. 14 to share similar experiences of geocaching and how the geocache could have been hidden differently 7 to caution about the dangers of hiding a geocache in such a location 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about geocaching 41 to correct spelling/grammar flames 6 to argue over whether it's geocache or geocaching another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive 53 to ask if the geocache has indeed been hidden 27 to post URL's where one can see examples of different geocaches 12 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the geocache controversy 4 to suggest that posters request they read Markwells FAQ 44 to ask what is a "FAQ" 2 to post reasons why the geocaching is the result of a Groundspeak conspiracy. 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 43 to say "do a Google search on hiding geocaches" and finally 1 lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again 1 poster to needleesly quote someone's entire post instead of snipping out the irrelevant bits. Two posters to start a nesting quote war! 1 poster to keep the lame joke going... One to ask, "Who are you calling lame?" 1 to accuse someone of having 100 times more forum posts than finds... One to take the accusation as a personal insult and open a new thread about it. Quote Link to comment
+SpongeRob Posted January 30, 2004 Author Share Posted January 30, 2004 15 moderators to discuss it in a private forum debating if they should close the topic. Quote Link to comment
WH Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 One schmuck to say GO PATRIOTS!!!!!! Quote Link to comment
+GOT GPS? Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 At least you can't quote a whole thread, or else the server would crash quickly. Quote Link to comment
+crzycrzy Posted January 30, 2004 Share Posted January 30, 2004 Post - a- lujah Post - a- lujah Post - a- lujah Post - a- lujah Post - a- lujah For the mod-er-ator hath posteth Post - a- lujah Post - a- lujah Post - a- lujah Post - a- lujah Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.