fffr Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 Why is there ban on mentioning n*v*cache and Bu*ley's website? Link to comment
+Corp Of Discovery Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 Most likely the same reason sock puppets are banned..... Link to comment
+CYBret Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 Any chance you tried searching the forums first before asking this question. I think it's been mentioned once or twice before. Bret Link to comment
+ChrisCindy Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 (edited) navacache and buxley's shouldn't be banned. Buxley's lists GC.com caches and navacache doesn't have enough caches to be worth while, at least where I am. Edited December 1, 2003 by Chris&Cindy Link to comment
+CO Admin Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 navacache and buxley's shouldn't be banned. Buxley's lists GC.com caches and navacache doesn't have enough caches to be worth while, at least where I am. ANd the fact that you were able to say them and it wasnt Moderated proves that they are not moderated or banned words on this forum Link to comment
+ChrisCindy Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 (edited) See everything is fine. <----I hope this isn't viewed as an attempt to "derail" the thread. Edited December 1, 2003 by Chris&Cindy Link to comment
+haggaeus Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 I think the new forums don't have the autocensoring of bad words built in yet, just a technical difficluty I guess. Let's try: Buxley (brillig.com). Navicache. Link to comment
+ChrisCindy Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 Lets try mothe... ok maybe not. Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 navacache and buxley's shouldn't be banned. Buxley's lists GC.com caches and navacache doesn't have enough caches to be worth while, at least where I am. ANd the fact that you were able to say them and it wasnt Moderated proves that they are not moderated or banned words on this forum He did misspell Navicache, but he was right that there aren't enough caches there for it to be a threat to GC.com. The nearest in my area is over an hour away, but it's a virtual. Link to comment
+Team Tecmage Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 As I recall, the falling out with Buxley got very public here in the forums. I think the fight leading to Navicache was the same. Yes, you can mention those names now, but I think some cachers feel like there should be better links and cooperation between the sites- the Geocaching Community is still very small. Link to comment
+ChrisCindy Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 (edited) navacache and buxley's shouldn't be banned. Buxley's lists GC.com caches and navacache doesn't have enough caches to be worth while, at least where I am. ANd the fact that you were able to say them and it wasnt Moderated proves that they are not moderated or banned words on this forum He did misspell Navicache, but he was right that there aren't enough caches there for it to be a threat to GC.com. The nearest in my area is over an hour away, but it's a virtual. Oh look at you Mr. perfect blah...blah...blah... Edited December 1, 2003 by Chris&Cindy Link to comment
+ChrisCindy Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 As I recall, the falling out with Buxley got very public here in the forums. I think the fight leading to Navicache was the same. Yes, you can mention those names now, but I think some cachers feel like there should be better links and cooperation between the sites- the Geocaching Community is still very small. Well said. Link to comment
+briansnat Posted December 2, 2003 Share Posted December 2, 2003 (edited) Is there a ban? I wasn't aware of it. Navicache, navicache, navicache, www.navicache.com. OK that worked. How about Buxley? Buxley, buxley, http://www.brillig.com/geocaching/. Hmmmmm, that seemed to go through too, so where is this so-called ban?? Someone is giving out bad info. Edited December 2, 2003 by briansnat Link to comment
+El Diablo Posted December 2, 2003 Share Posted December 2, 2003 Why would GC censor mentioning of Navicache? Let people go look. They'll come back here quickly enough. I think there are a lot of rumors going around that aren't quite true. Competition is always a good thing...especially if your providing the better product. As far as Buxley's...I see no problem. El Diablo Link to comment
Jeremy Posted December 2, 2003 Share Posted December 2, 2003 Closing this thread. Started by a sockpuppet account. Link to comment
Recommended Posts