+MartyFouts Posted September 4, 2002 Share Posted September 4, 2002 Couple weeks ago I went to Pleasanton for a personal cache-athon. It was not the best possible trip, I got NFs on 4 caches. I logged all four. I've heard back from three of the cache hiders, and the caches are definitely still there. (In three cases, I suspected it was, in the fourth, I'm still surprised I couldn't find it. ) But I still think that logging them was a good thing. I encourage it: if you looked for the cache, log an NF, even if you assume it was your failure to find the cache rather than the cache not being there. Quote Link to comment
+MartyFouts Posted September 4, 2002 Share Posted September 4, 2002 Couple weeks ago I went to Pleasanton for a personal cache-athon. It was not the best possible trip, I got NFs on 4 caches. I logged all four. I've heard back from three of the cache hiders, and the caches are definitely still there. (In three cases, I suspected it was, in the fourth, I'm still surprised I couldn't find it. ) But I still think that logging them was a good thing. I encourage it: if you looked for the cache, log an NF, even if you assume it was your failure to find the cache rather than the cache not being there. Quote Link to comment
+Team Minim Posted September 4, 2002 Share Posted September 4, 2002 I regard the logs made as contemporaeneous records of cache trips. I don't feel a failure logging a frownie, I just feel frustrated. Recently on Hols doing Heavens Gate Wilts we spent at least an hour searching, to no avail. Later in the week I went back approached from a new direction and walked right into it. For the kids and me the lessons were more important than the cache. Persistance (in looking), Honesty (in logging the frownie) , and clear thinking ( in trying again from a different angle). The two logs a few days apart will always remind us of that. Shares in Tupperware? Be a Geocacher! Quote Link to comment
+hotfoot Posted September 5, 2002 Share Posted September 5, 2002 My question is this: Why won't people log a cache as "not found" when they don't find it I almost never log a 'Not Found'. It has always seemed a waste of time. I just go home and pout and cry. After sticking pins in some voodoo dolls I feel better. At first I failed to find about 30% now I find all but about 15%. I have learned to avoid caches placed by certain teams and individuals as they are just too clever for me. It never occured to me that a cache owner would monitor the cache page to see if it had gone missing. Reevaluating my attitude around 'Not Found' seems indicated. Quote Link to comment
+Jamie Z Posted September 5, 2002 Share Posted September 5, 2002 Hotfoot, Not only do not founds indicate to the owner that there might be something worth checking on... But as Joe Geocacher, I like to read not found logs... just to see what other cachers go through. I've missed my share of caches, and I like to know I'm not the only one. Occasionally I'll go to the most recent logs page, and do you know which logs I read? Not all those found logs. Those are boring and usually say not much more than "found it, nice cache." The not found logs are many times more interesting. Jamie Quote Link to comment
+Jamie Z Posted September 5, 2002 Share Posted September 5, 2002 quote:Originally posted by Orange:I find nothing wrong with NOT FOUNDS, I even list mine on my profile. I liked this idea so much I implemented it myself, complete with links! Jamie Quote Link to comment
+eroyd Posted September 5, 2002 Share Posted September 5, 2002 I always post "not founds". Often the story behind them are more amusing than a find. Besides a frowny usually means you didn't CHEAT! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.