Guest bacpac Posted September 3, 2001 Share Posted September 3, 2001 One of the criticisms of my cache came from a geocacher who was upset because I had not listed the elevation of my cache. This may be of little consequence to most, but admittedly my cache is below a cliff. Should I post such hazards or allow the geocacher's own ability to be his guide? Map links are clearly available. Who doesn't consult a map? Quote Link to comment
Guest ClayJar Posted September 3, 2001 Share Posted September 3, 2001 I would say that if they could find out by checking the topo link, it's in their court. If there is information they can't get from the map and topo links, it might be worth noting in the description. (People that don't do their homework should understand that they may have difficulty on the test... in fact, some even hope they will.) Quote Link to comment
Guest wapa2ee Posted September 3, 2001 Share Posted September 3, 2001 although Iam new to this I personally think the lat/lon and one clue is plenty of info for me getting there should not be a path of waypoints thats more like connect the dots i want to find the cache and have my own experience not copy the owners experience Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.