+Skully & Mulder et al. Posted January 30, 2003 Share Posted January 30, 2003 What is the difference? Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted January 30, 2003 Share Posted January 30, 2003 Depends on the state, but often they are managed by different agencies, for different goals. Kind of similar to national parks, vs. national forests. In NJ they are managed by the same agency (Division of Parks & Forestry), but there are some differnces in the regulations. A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away. -Barry Goldwater [This message was edited by BrianSnat on January 30, 2003 at 05:53 PM.] Quote Link to comment
Isildur's Bane Posted January 31, 2003 Share Posted January 31, 2003 In Minnesota there are both. State Parks are preserves and managed to provide recreational opportunities - they usually have nice campsites, visitor centers. State Forests are logged, and there are fewer rules (you can camp anywhere, for example, or ride an ATV) and less developed recreational opportunities. Quote Link to comment
+WaldenRun Posted January 31, 2003 Share Posted January 31, 2003 Our state parks are usually more developed than a state forest. For instance, official swimming spots are normally in state parks, with bath houses, etc. The state parks might also have official picnic areas, and at least some paved roads. Our state forests usually have trails and dirt roads, and not much else. Oh yeah, state forests are free and many state parks charge to get in, at least in season. -WR "Why worry when you can obsess?" Quote Link to comment
+Gloom Posted January 31, 2003 Share Posted January 31, 2003 quote:Originally posted by BrianSnat:Depends on the state, but often they are managed by different agencies, for different goals. Kind of similar to national parks, vs. national forests. That's the way I understand it. At least here in Oregon. The State Forests are managed by the Oregon Department of Forestry and the State Parks are managed by the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. As far as different goals: State Parks (quoted from their web site) The mission of the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department: To provide and protect outstanding natural, scenic, cultural, historic and recreational sites for the enjoyment and education of present and future generations. ODF (quoted from their web site) To serve the people of Oregon through the protection, management, and promotion of a healthy forest environment, which will enhance Oregon’s livability and economy for today and tomorrow. ---- Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side and a dark side, and it holds the universe together. Quote Link to comment
+Skully & Mulder et al. Posted January 31, 2003 Author Share Posted January 31, 2003 I thought there might be 1 or 2 things that distinguish parks from forests but I guess there are more factors involved. The fact that forests are less developed then parks makes perfect sense. Quote Link to comment
+Waterboy Posted February 1, 2003 Share Posted February 1, 2003 In Pennsylvania we not only have State Parks and State Forests. We also have State Game Lands to add more confusion. Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted February 1, 2003 Share Posted February 1, 2003 In NJ we add Wildlife Management Areas (WMA's) to the mix. The land has been purchased thanks to the license fees paid by hunters and fishermen, but is open to all (but be real careful during hunting season). A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away. -Barry Goldwater Quote Link to comment
mortonfox Posted February 2, 2003 Share Posted February 2, 2003 And there are the Nature Conservancy and the Audubon Society, charities that own and manage some nature preserves. Quote Link to comment
Lefty Skywalker Posted February 2, 2003 Share Posted February 2, 2003 The way I understand it, parks (state or national) are for preserving, and forests are for logging. What Would Yoda Do? Quote Link to comment
+yumitori Posted February 4, 2003 Share Posted February 4, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Lefty Skywalker:The way I understand it, parks (state or national) are for preserving, and forests are for logging. That may be the case in some states, but National Forests, at least, exist for a number of uses, including not only logging, but wildlife management, watershed protection, mineral extraction, and recreation. Ron/yumitori Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted February 4, 2003 Share Posted February 4, 2003 We (in NJ) don't log our state forests. I think the major difference here is that the state parks usually have facilities like visitor centers, bathrooms, beaches, campsites, parking lots and often charge admission. On the other hand our state forests have no facilities. I think another difference is that hunting is allowed in state forests, but not state parks, but I could be wrong on this one. A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away. -Barry Goldwater Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.