Jump to content

How did the term "muggle" come to be for non-geocaching peeps


Recommended Posts

quote:
Originally posted by Team GPSaxophone:

Think of it this way, in our culture being a witch is a bad thing. In their culture, being a muggle is a bad thing, but they don't burn them at the stake. It is not about race, it is about ability.

 


 

"We've found a muggle, may we burn her?"

 

--------------------

You have the right to defend yourself, even when geocaching!

Link to comment

quote:
You were the victim of a scam. Stouffer's lawsuit was rejected, and the judge determined she was attempting to perpetuate a fraud against Rowling and her publishers.
You are putting words in my mouth that I did not say. Did I state anywhere that Rowling plagarized the Stouffer materials?

 

Stouffer's lawsuit was rejected because she and her lawyer falsified evidence. However, she did write the Larry Potter series, in which she did use the term "muggles," a decade before Rowling wrote her first Harry Potter.

 

IMHO, the most likely explanation is that Rowling may have been the victim of an author's worst nightmare. Perhaps she read some of the Stouffer material, forgot about it, then dredged it out of her subconscious.

 

____________________________

- Team Og Rof A Klaw

All who wander are not lost.

Link to comment

quote:
Originally posted by Team Og Rof A Klaw:

 

You are putting words in my mouth that I did not say. Did I state anywhere that Rowling plagarized the Stouffer materials?

 


 

Hmmm. You said -

 

quote:
There's some evidence that Rowling, uh, recycled the term "muggles," and several other things.

 

Sounds to me that's what you are saying. Obviously you are not, so I'm unclear on what your message is.

 

quote:

 

Stouffer's lawsuit was rejected because she and her lawyer falsified evidence. However, she _did_ write the Larry Potter series, in which she _did_ use the term "muggles," _a decade before Rowling wrote her first Harry Potter._

 


 

Actually, the 'Larry Potter' story and the 'The Legend of Rah and Muggles' are two separate books. As I understand it, one of the problems with Stouffer's claims is that there's no evidence that the 'Larry Potter' story ever existed before Rowling's books were released.

 

quote:

 

IMHO, the most likely explanation is that Rowling may have been the victim of an author's worst nightmare. Perhaps she read some of the Stouffer material, forgot about it, then dredged it out of her subconscious.

 


 

Possible, but unlikely. The Stouffer book(s) had very limited distribution, Rowling was never in an area where she might have encountered them (or it). There would have had to be too many coincidences for her to have ever read the material.

 

In any case, what Stouffer offered up on her website as 'evidence' of plagerism actually proved to me that the claims were groundless. The 'similarities' were nothing of the sort, or were very common literary devices.

 

Ron/yumitori

 

---

 

Remember what the dormouse said...

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...