aerial photo freeware

[+NightPilot]

As Blindleader said, I'm not sure why you would want a separate utility to do that, since USAPhotomaps has it built in.

[+blindleader]

BTW, there is a utility (can't recall the name...it's Terrasomethingorother) that works with USAPhotoMaps.  What it does is allow you to enter coordinates to describe an area and it will retrieve all those files and put them into USAPhotoMaps' image directory.

I ran across it. It's called TerraFetcher and it's linked on the photomaps web site. I haven't tried it yet, but apparently it allows the downloading of areas of arbitrary shape.

[+geobc]

I ran across it. It's called TerraFetcher and it's linked on the photomaps web site. I haven't tried it yet, but apparently it allows the downloading of areas of arbitrary shape.

Thx for posting that. I keep forgetting to check the name by looking on my upstairs computer at home. Yes, it was Terrafetcher that I was thinking of.

 

GeoBC

[+JDan150]

I found Arecibo Radio Observatory in Puerto Rico

 

N18 20.653

W66 45.143

 

http://www.terraserver.microsoft.com/image...1843&Y=5074&W=2

[+mrking]

Man, I wish we had this kinda of thing for canada.

[+LeGodFather]

Did you try the new GOOGLE MAPS (still in Beta)?

 

Try this link here

 

That's the Olympic Stadium in Montreal (Quebec).

 

Ciao!

GrosseFamille

[+Marky]

Did you try the new GOOGLE MAPS (still in Beta)?

 

Try this link here

 

That's the Olympic Stadium in Montreal (Quebec).

 

Ciao!

GrosseFamille

That photo really hilights the distortion you get from the sat (vs aerial) photos because the angle is far from perpendicular to the location being photographed. (At least, that's the way it looks to me).

 

--Marky

[+LeGodFather]

You're right. There is an angle.

 

I didn't make the difference between aerial and satellite photo.

 

But for the price, I'm willing to overlook this!

 

Ciao!

GrosseFamille