+Stunod Posted September 5, 2002 Share Posted September 5, 2002 I have a Palm m130 with the NAVMAN GPS add on. I downloaded the GeoNiche software (http://www.nwlink.com/~raydar/GeoNiche/index.html) and love it. Only problem I have is I'm afraid of damaging my Palm out in the "wild" while geocaching. So far I have only tried 1/1 caches, and I fear damaging the unit in more challanging terrain. Any suggestions for a GPS that has all the features I get with GeoNiche on the Palm? I plan on using the Palm for "on road" navigation and a new GPS in the field. Therefore I don't need the fancy "turn by turn" driving features some units have, but I do want a unit that gets better reception under tree cover and is durable. Let's here from all you fans of the particular unit you use...what makes it better than the others? Thanks in advance to all who respond. [This message was edited by Stunod on September 05, 2002 at 07:39 PM.] Quote Link to comment
+apersson850 Posted September 6, 2002 Share Posted September 6, 2002 I like the added capability of the magnetic compass in my unit. Very handy when standing still near a cache. Available in some models and brands. Anders Quote Link to comment
OuttaHand Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 My first attempt to find a cache was with an old Garmin 45 (now obsolete) and it was horrible. Zero coverage under trees. I then (as you now) looked for suggestions for a better unit. I found a few recommendations for the Garmin 76. I looked around a bit and bought one. I love it. Excellent sensitivity and coverage in trees, etc. I have found a few caches with it now and have really grown to like it a lot. Quote Link to comment
+Gimpy Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 The GPS 76 is a good choice. I've got the MAP76, among other units, & you'll find that it will serve you well under adverse conditions (tree cover, etc.)Whatever you get, go for something with a quad helix antenna. Up here in the Northeast, the smaller but feature packed eTrex line, with the patch antenna,didn't fare as well under a dense canopy of tree cover. And, stating the obvious, always carry a stand alone, basic, good ol' non-battery powered compass. "Gimpy" Quote Link to comment
+EraSeek Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 Yeah, what he (Gimpy) said, Map76. The only thing I would add is that I also have a Garmin 12. Probably the most rugged unit out there, but probably does not have all the feature you want. I use it on the really tough stuff. Quote Link to comment
+sbukosky Posted September 8, 2002 Share Posted September 8, 2002 The 76 would be a good choice but also consider a Garmin eMap. I have one and just bought the Garmin V. I find the map portion of the eMap nice to have as many old roads and some trails are shown when Mapsource maps are loaded. Further, I find the shape of the eMap very nice to slip in the shirt pocket or pants pocket. I'm thinking that I might just use my V for navigation and the eMap for trail use. The big point is that the eMap can be bought for well under $200 just about anywhere. Steve Bukosky N9BGH Waukesha Wisconsin Quote Link to comment
+headmj Posted September 9, 2002 Share Posted September 9, 2002 I Have a Meridian Green and It is very durable. It is water proof to 3 ft (I Think) and it is very well sealed against the elements. It is also fairly rugged as I have dropped it down the side of a hill at the Dowd Multi-cache and it kept on ticking. Quote Link to comment
+LongDogs Posted September 9, 2002 Share Posted September 9, 2002 Ok, since we are offering suggestions, I'll say that what I have is a SporTrak Pro, and it has worked really well for me, and I like the compact size vs the Meridian. Only tradeoff is the Meridian has expandable memory, and a slightly larger screen. Both have the same antenna and receiver circuitry. If you travel all over the US and needs LOTS of maps onboard, go for the Meridian and a 128mb SD card. A SporTrrak Pro holds the Streets & Topo for my entire state, though, with about 6mb left over, so for me it is wasn't worth the extra weight & bulk. Also, even with the smaller patch antennas the eTrex line works ok in the pine woods we have in the south. (Don't get me wrong -- it's not as good as a Quad Helix, but good enough.) There's probably a greater difference in denser cover, like the Pacific Northwest, though. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.