+J. Galt Posted May 4, 2003 Share Posted May 4, 2003 My subjuct is really my whole question, any suggestions? Quote Link to comment
+GeneralBracket Posted May 4, 2003 Share Posted May 4, 2003 I prefer Topo. I used to like Metroguide, but Topo had just about as many streets as Metroguide plus contour lines. To me it's acedemic anyway. I don't really NEED maps at all for geocaching. Quote Link to comment
+Traveling Jones Posted May 4, 2003 Share Posted May 4, 2003 I 2nd the vote for topo, and you can turn off the contour lines if you want. How come the needle in my compass is 68? off? Quote Link to comment
+jollybgood Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 My vote is for Metroguide simply because of the street detail. Metroguide even shows the parking lanes behind my building. (and it's routable if you have a GPSV). It also does a decenty job of showing waterways too -- something TOPO lacks. I had TOPO and just didn't find it that useful. But of course I live in a flat part of the country (Illinois). If I live in Colorado or Kentucky I'd probably feel diffrently about it. Jolly R. Blackburn http://kenzerco.com Quote Link to comment
+JamesJM Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 Jolly B Good sums it up well...it depends. I live in the country and I prefer rural or even wilderness locations...the Topo works best for me. MOST caches, however, are in the cities. I don't have Metroguide but I would assume it would be better for these caches. Either will work for you, IMHO. Backpacking being my first love the TOPO was a must. Were I rich, I'd have them all...might anyway some day. Quote Link to comment
+EtrexRose Posted May 10, 2003 Share Posted May 10, 2003 I suggest City Navigator because it can autoroute, send the route to your gps, then you can follow it and never miss a turn on the way to a geocache, unless you really find the topo lines a MUST for geocaching (of course it is not needed except in certain situations which I cannot think of) I do what I gotta do, when I GOTTA do it. Quote Link to comment
Team Sidewinder Posted May 10, 2003 Share Posted May 10, 2003 I guess it all depends what part of the country you are located in. Here in Montana the TOPO works best for me because even cities are small in comparison to some places and there are lots and lots of open spaces. Terrain contours are more important to me than city blocks or street names. Just works for me. sidewinder LOST AND FOUND DEPT. Quote Link to comment
+Renegade Knight Posted May 11, 2003 Share Posted May 11, 2003 Topo is my vote. I can usually find a City cache even with little to no problem evne if the topo doesn't have the streets. However when it comes to the rural caches topo helps immeasurable. Finding trails, or the right trail isn't always easy. ===================== Wherever you go there you are. Quote Link to comment
+BigJon Posted May 11, 2003 Share Posted May 11, 2003 I use Topo and like the heck out of it. I'm a n00bie but it has been easy for me to use/learn. Quote Link to comment
+Alan2 Posted May 11, 2003 Share Posted May 11, 2003 That depends on which Garmin GPS you're using. Alan Quote Link to comment
+2manytoyz Posted May 12, 2003 Share Posted May 12, 2003 The Metroguide is a nice software package, but the maps take up more room. It has more "useless" (to me) data available (gas stations ,restaurants, campgrounds, movie theaters, Post Offices, etc.). This information takes up more space. My Legend only has 8 MB, so I use it carefully. I'm currently using the Topo map set and the Roads and Recreation set. The R&R set is my most commonly loaded software. It provides most everything I use. I can get almost half of FL loaded into 8MB. It also contains all the marine navigational aids that I use while boating. Robert http://www.2manytoyz.com/ Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.