+PhilatSea Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 (edited) This is a bit of a weird one. Looking for caches in Punta del Este Uruguay. I load the map and see a cache and click on it and all looks good. I then click on it and it loads and the page looks like it has formatted correctly until I move down to the logs . It is not formatted correctly at all. It appears to be disabled back in August 2020, but nothing further. I then opened it in Chrome and and it displayed correctly along with 3 additional logs with the last one showing archived. Tried the old clear the cache etc. but still not right. Any thoughts? Below is Firefox Map below is in FireFox of the logs Now 9in Chrome Edited January 25 by PhilatSea Added 2 additional photos 1 Quote Link to comment
+LydiaSimmons Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 The cache description for GCA1R22 contains logs copied and pasted into the description, which are not formatted exactly as they appear on a cache page. Are you sure you're not looking at the original cache, GC829MG, in Chrome? 2 Quote Link to comment
+PhilatSea Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 3 hours ago, LydiaSimmons said: The cache description for GCA1R22 contains logs copied and pasted into the description, which are not formatted exactly as they appear on a cache page. Are you sure you're not looking at the original cache, GC829MG, in Chrome? Yes. cleared the cache as well in both. 1 Quote Link to comment
+Pontiac_CZ Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 I didn't quite understand the issue so I opened the GCA1R22 in my Firefox 121.0.1 and Chrome 121.0.6167.85. The cachepage looks identical in both browsers. The Franymarie's "archive" log or GeoCrater's "post reviewer note" can't be found in either one. This screenshot is actually taken from older (and archived) cache GC829MG. You're apparently mixing screenshots from two different caches here. Please note that the listing of the newer GCA1R22 consists of copy of logs from the archived GC829MG - hence the weird formatting. If you scrolled down in your Firefox you would get the correct log section that is formatted as usual. 1 Quote Link to comment
+PhilatSea Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 Okay I have figured it out with past posts. The original cache was archived. It was then done as a redo and the new CO copied the logs from the original cache to make the cache page. I did not go down the "new" cache page far enough to see the current logs that are current. When I was in chrome I was looking at the "new" cache page that was different than the archived one. I did not look at the GC number because the start of the cache page was the same. Thanks to all that helped me understand what happened. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.