cathegory for this

[+Ariberna]

Is there any cathegory for this coin os tourist machines?

Abmnything for the machine and anything for the photo?

I think thay tourist stamps are made of wood.

thanks

[+sernikk]

You are probably looking for "Penny Smashers" - https://www.Waymarking.com/cat/details.aspx?f=1&guid=1eb565b4-98cc-4492-8653-90488e4d87b7

 

There is already a topic for such questions:

 

[+Ariberna]

thanks

[+ScroogieII]

On 4/1/2021 at 5:28 AM, Ariberna said:

I think the tourist stamps are made of wood.

 

I was sure there was a category for wooden tourist tokens, or something similar. Alas, can't find it today, though.

Mebbe it was just a proposal that died on the vine.

Edited April 4, 2021 by ScroogieII

[+Ariberna]

Hello.

I submited this in European Historic Survey Stones, Monuments and Benchmarks and said me that isn't here (but there are other same DPMT

https://www.Waymarking.com/waymarks/wmYB63_Borne_DPM_T_M066_i_LJP )and said that cathegory changed and I submited in Public Land. Now denied in Public Land too and said thay I submit them (I Have 10 points similar) in Spanish Land... but isn't exist the cathegory. Exist other countries Portugal Geodesic, Us Benchmarks, australian Benchmarks, etc)

Help.

May be in one cathegory, I think that Survey stones but What would you say?

In one cathegory had to submit, isn't objects that can't go in nothing cathegory.

[+PISA-caching]

18 minutes ago, ScroogieII said:

I was sure there was a category for wooden tourist tokens, or something similar. Alas, can't find it today, though.

 

Tourist Stamps Photos

 

[+PISA-caching]

13 minutes ago, Ariberna said:

Now denied in Public Land too and said thay I submit them (I Have 10 points similar) in Spanish Land... but isn't exist the cathegory.

 

 

Vértices Geodésicos maybe?

 

[+ScroogieII]

11 hours ago, PISA-caching said:

 

Tourist Stamps Photos

 

 

That's it! Thanks, Andreas.

I looked at the name thinking it was another, unrelated, category. Kind of a misleading name, methinks.

In any event, this should be what Ariberna was looking for.

[+ScroogieII]

11 hours ago, Ariberna said:

Hello.

I submited this in European Historic Survey Stones, Monuments and Benchmarks and said me that isn't here (but there are others the same DPMT

https://www.Waymarking.com/waymarks/wmYB63_Borne_DPM_T_M066_i_LJP )and said that category changed and I submitted in Public Land. Now denied in Public Land too and said that I submit them (I Have 10 points similar) in Spanish Land... but the category doesn't exist. Existing are other countries', Portugal Geodesic, Us Benchmarks, Australian Benchmarks, etc)

Help.

May be in one cathegory, I think that Survey stones but What would you say?

In one category had to submit, isn't objects that can't go in nothing category.

 

 

 

A little more info is in order now.

Are there any markings at all on the marker?

Do any of the other 10 have markings?

This looks like it has a plumb bob target in the centre, making it a benchmark (or similar) of some sort.

More detailed photos would help.

 

Keith

[+bluesnote]

20 hours ago, PISA-caching said:

 

 

Vértices Geodésicos maybe?

 

I was the one that declined them in Public Land Survey Marks. These do not appear to be defining property lines and boundaries. I suggested you should submit to either European Historic Survey Stones or the Spanish Benchmarks (Vértices Geodésicos) category. Either one (or both) should do IMO. 

[+Ariberna]

15 hours ago, ScroogieII said:

 

A little more info is in order now.

Are there any markings at all on the marker?

Do any of the other 10 have markings?

This looks like it has a plumb bob target in the centre, making it a benchmark (or similar) of some sort.

More detailed photos would help.

 

Keith

Yes, each of them has a number

[+Ariberna]

At the end were in Vertice geodesico submited.

thanks partners

[+ScroogieII]

On 4/5/2021 at 8:35 AM, Ariberna said:

At the end were in Vertice geodesico submited.

thanks partners

 

Ah, yes, BUT, has it been approved?

EDIT: Curious, I looked - I didn't see it. All things considered, it appears that it will/should, indeed, be accepted.

Edited April 6, 2021 by ScroogieII