+Ariberna Posted February 6, 2021 Share Posted February 6, 2021 Today was canceled a lot of WM mine from Segovia, Spain. I cant understand this control because reviewer say that one photo is for internet. Few months ago I thiught that problem of internet photos copied was solved with the WM of Church os Carballiño (VeraCruz) but I see that no. I don't know how to say you, reviewers, that all photos are mine. I put my private photos that was taken in 2008. I hope that you were hard with other waymarkers and other WM that published without visited the city. I hope that NEVER AGAIN I had put my photos here. Quote Link to comment
+Ariberna Posted February 6, 2021 Author Share Posted February 6, 2021 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Ariberna said: Today was canceled a lot of WM mine from Segovia, Spain. I cant understand this control because reviewer say that one photo is for internet. Few months ago I thiught that problem of internet photos copied was solved with the WM of Church os Carballiño (VeraCruz) but I see that no. I don't know how to say you, reviewers, that all photos are mine. I put my private photos that was taken in 2008. I hope that you were hard with other waymarkers and other WM that published without visited the city. I hope that NEVER AGAIN I had put my photos here. The difference of photos that I put and the web are: the angle of chapitels, the tree and... The mark of water with the name of the web. Other was similar with a photo of tripadvisor (Claustro de San Francisco) but the photo was mine... I am Ariberna in tripadvisor too. This travel was for Segovia, Burgos, etc Edited February 6, 2021 by Ariberna added Quote Link to comment
+Alfouine Posted February 6, 2021 Share Posted February 6, 2021 Yes i declined these waymarks because i could find them with a Google image search. I asked you information about these photos and you replied that is your photos taken in 2008 I sent to you a message with my email address to send to me the originals photos You prefer add a discussion on the forum instead of sending to me your photos and publish again your waymarks I will decline your waymarks until you send to me the originals, it's not very difficult to send to me your photos !!! 2 1 Quote Link to comment
+Ariberna Posted February 6, 2021 Author Share Posted February 6, 2021 (edited) There were send, sorry I saw you mail later. Edited February 6, 2021 by Ariberna Quote Link to comment
+Ariberna Posted February 6, 2021 Author Share Posted February 6, 2021 I didn't now that reviewers can say for send private and original photos 1 Quote Link to comment
+Ariberna Posted February 6, 2021 Author Share Posted February 6, 2021 (edited) Closed the problem! but is incredible Edited February 6, 2021 by Ariberna Quote Link to comment
+Alfouine Posted February 6, 2021 Share Posted February 6, 2021 Waymarker sent to me originals photos and i have approved all his waymarks concerned Nothing incredible i do my job and my job is to control waymarks published 2 1 Quote Link to comment
+Ariberna Posted February 6, 2021 Author Share Posted February 6, 2021 And I didn't say thay the published was you. But now we are semiconfined and repass my WM piblished and add other WM cathegories of them when I can. And is so snnoying that they cancel WM piblished as canceling them yourself. Now I know was the "internet photo" of Alcazar, but I don't know what was of the Cathedral for be canceled. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.