Last visited field

[ggmorton 6]

The last visited field which is displayed next to a waymark when displaying search results is not displaying the correct date. It is displaying the most recent entered visit date. The date could be older than the more recent visit date.

[+fi67 152]

Well observed, that's absolutely correct, and that's how it's been since the beginning. It's one the many mysteries in the Wamarking dates mess, and not even most astonishing or disturbing one.

[ggmorton 6]

11 hours ago, fi67 said:

Well observed, that's absolutely correct, and that's how it's been since the beginning. It's one the many mysteries in the Waymarking dates mess, and not even most astonishing or disturbing one.

I've been here from almost the beginning, but I guess I don't remember noticing it before.  One of the mysteries.

[+Max and 99 2130]

I'm lost.

[+elyob 154]

Who ever was last to log a waymark-visit gets their date on the waymark page, the chronology does not matter.

Edited October 21 by elyob

[+Max and 99 2130]

On 10/19/2020 at 9:47 AM, ggmorton said:

The last visited field which is displayed next to a waymark when displaying search results is not displaying the correct date. It is displaying the most recent entered visit date. The date could be older than the more recent visit date.

I'm so lost. Every waymark I checked from a search result shows the correct last visited date. Unless we have a different definition of last visited date. Is that the problem? I understand last visited date to mean the most recent date that someone logged a visit on the waymark. 

[+elyob 154]

'Last visited' only appears in list form.  Use the Featured Waymarks list as an example.  Then check visit dates (on list vs on page) for Three Mile Island News Article waymark.

Edited October 21 by elyob

[+Max and 99 2130]

Ok, after checking about 50 I finally saw one, the featured waymark mentioned by @elyob