Not a category listed as a category

[+Max and 99 2052]

Can we please get this glitch fixed? The bandwagon is getting more full with submissions. Those who know better are not submitting waymarks but not everybody is aware this is a mistake listing. 

 

This is happened several times in the past few years, from what I remember.

 

How can we help prevent this in the future? I have an idea. Delete the waymarks instead of archiving them, when they are approved for a non-approved category. The incentive will be removed. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited September 5 by Max and 99

[+TheBrowns! 1]

man you really had to get the last word in.

[+Max and 99 2052]

12 minutes ago, TheBrowns! said:

man you really had to get the last word in.

I'm trying to get the glitch fixed. You're welcome.

[+elyob 150]

wayfrog, there are now nine published waymarks in this not published category.

 

The number grows daily.

Edited September 11 by elyob

[+elyob 150]

ten

[+Max and 99 2052]

The officers know it's wrong but they submit to the category and continue approving them anyway.  They are thumbing their noses at us. 

[vulture1957 169]

I just can't believe folks are wasting their time and energy to write up these waymarks, knowing that they will be deleted soon.

[+outdoorsoccer 25]

4 hours ago, vulture1957 said:

I just can't believe folks are wasting their time and energy to write up these waymarks, knowing that they will be deleted soon.

My guess is that they are trying to show that there is an interest in the category in hopes it doesn’t get archived/deleted by TPTB.

[+Max and 99 2052]

32 minutes ago, outdoorsoccer said:

My guess is that they are trying to show that there is an interest in the category in hopes it doesn’t get archived/deleted by TPTB.

That's not how Waymarking works and those involved are fully aware. Categories are voted on by the Waymarking community and this category did not pass peer review. It's currently showing only because of a glitch in the system. 

Edited September 13 by Max and 99

[+ScroogieII 48]

outdoorsoccer may have a point. However, we'll leave it up to TheBrowns! to respond.

 

Keith

[+elyob 150]

twelve

[ggmorton 6]

If you are talking about Chain Parmacies, then I didn't know it didn't pass peer review. I saw it in the category grid. Submitted a waymark, and it got approved. I'm sorry if I contributed to the mess.

[wayfrog 74]

Done. I've been on vacation, sorry for the delay.