+adgorn Posted May 24, 2020 Share Posted May 24, 2020 Daughters & Sons of the American Revolution Historic Sites Doesn't look like you can post to this? Am I missing something? Quote Link to comment
+iconions Posted May 24, 2020 Share Posted May 24, 2020 1 hour ago, adgorn said: Daughters & Sons of the American Revolution Historic Sites Doesn't look like you can post to this? Am I missing something? The category is locked and the leader hasn't released it. Quote Link to comment
+bluesnote Posted May 25, 2020 Share Posted May 25, 2020 Actually, I can't unlock it. I would love to re-write the category to get it up and going again but I think it's an issue with Groundspeak. Wayfrog will need to step in and override the lock as I can't do it. Quote Link to comment
bootron Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 This should be fixed now. I've archived it. bootron Quote Link to comment
+bluesnote Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 21 minutes ago, bootron said: This should be fixed now. I've archived it. bootron That did the trick! Thank you. I'll be re-amping the category this weekend when I have time. Quote Link to comment
wayfrog Posted June 2, 2020 Share Posted June 2, 2020 I archived it a second time. Hope it's still working for you. If not, let us know. Quote Link to comment
+adgorn Posted September 10, 2020 Author Share Posted September 10, 2020 Any progress to report on this? Thanks. Quote Link to comment
+bluesnote Posted September 11, 2020 Share Posted September 11, 2020 7 hours ago, adgorn said: Any progress to report on this? Thanks. Yes, sorry. Just started school again so I'll be working on this category slowly. I'm going to try and get somewhat of a rough outline done by the end of September. I appreciate the reminder Quote Link to comment
+bluesnote Posted December 30, 2020 Share Posted December 30, 2020 Oops, I completely forgot about this. I just made some edits to the category. Please let me know what you all think before moving forward to peer review. Thank you! https://www.Waymarking.com/cat/details.aspx?f=1&guid=dbdd340f-c7a6-4a88-9119-f9ff39243d6d&gid=6&exp=True 1 Quote Link to comment
+Bear and Ragged Posted December 30, 2020 Share Posted December 30, 2020 9 hours ago, bluesnote said: Oops, I completely forgot about this. I just made some edits to the category. Please let me know what you all think before moving forward to peer review. Thank you! https://www.Waymarking.com/cat/details.aspx?f=1&guid=dbdd340f-c7a6-4a88-9119-f9ff39243d6d&gid=6&exp=True Edit required? Instructions for posting: 4. We require at least 2 good quality photos to be taken and uploaded. Some sites, if large, may warren additional photos if deemed necessary. Should it be warrant? ie Required, not warren as in rabbit? 1 Quote Link to comment
+bluesnote Posted December 30, 2020 Share Posted December 30, 2020 6 hours ago, Bear and Ragged said: Edit required? Instructions for posting: 4. We require at least 2 good quality photos to be taken and uploaded. Some sites, if large, may warren additional photos if deemed necessary. Should it be warrant? ie Required, not warren as in rabbit? Ah, good catch! I'll make the edit Quote Link to comment
+K13 Posted December 30, 2020 Share Posted December 30, 2020 18 hours ago, bluesnote said: Oops, I completely forgot about this. I just made some edits to the category. Please let me know what you all think before moving forward to peer review. Thank you! https://www.Waymarking.com/cat/details.aspx?f=1&guid=dbdd340f-c7a6-4a88-9119-f9ff39243d6d&gid=6&exp=True Another edit needed in the sentence following the prior one in #4. "One photo should be of the marker. The second should be the surround area with the marker in noticeable sight ." Shouldn't this be "surrounding" and there is a space before the period at the end of that sentence. 1 Quote Link to comment
+bluesnote Posted December 30, 2020 Share Posted December 30, 2020 25 minutes ago, K13 said: Another edit needed in the sentence following the prior one in #4. "One photo should be of the marker. The second should be the surround area with the marker in noticeable sight ." Shouldn't this be "surrounding" and there is a space before the period at the end of that sentence. Thanks for the point out. I'll get right on it. 1 Quote Link to comment
+bluesnote Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 With no further questions or comments I can only assume it is ready for peer review. Please vote! If you have any questions or concerns, voice them here. Thank you! Quote Link to comment
+PISA-caching Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 To be very honest, I have not contributed to that discussion, because I have little to no knowledge of that matter. Now that peer review has started, I ask myself: What exactly is the category referring to? The description talks about "historic sites that have helped win American Independence", but in the examples I see the text of a plaque that "commemorates the 150th anniversary of the visit to this anchoring cove by author Richard Henry Dana" in 1835/1885(?). Either way, this was decades after America got its independence. Later the description says: "There are numerous of historic DAR and SAR sites all over the world and each tell a little bit of history that helped shape the modern United States." This would (IMHO) also include historic sites that were important after America got its independence. But as it is now this is just a theoretical question. Quote Link to comment
+Ariberna Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 I voted. I think that one cathegory thay isn't global because is only for USA now is bad for WM. We need cathegories thay can be posted in Usa, Spain, China and Australia. There are a lot of USA. It's my opinion Quote Link to comment
+bluesnote Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 2 hours ago, Ariberna said: I voted. I think that one cathegory thay isn't global because is only for USA now is bad for WM. We need cathegories thay can be posted in Usa, Spain, China and Australia. There are a lot of USA. It's my opinion Most of the sites are in the US, however, there are a number of them overseas so it solves the global issue that people are incorrectly stating. Quote Link to comment
+sernikk Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 40 minutes ago, bluesnote said: Most of the sites are in the US, however, there are a number of them overseas so it solves the global issue that people are incorrectly stating. But it's still focusing on the topic of the US DAS. Categories focused on certain regions just shouldn't be a thing imo. There are a lot of stupid categories already, e.g.: -"signs of history" separated between states - each state has it's own, -Canadian benchmarks, US Benchmarks, Latvian Benchmarks and so on, instead of having just Benchmarks overall? I can imagine differences, between the continents, but there is already a category for all European benchmarks and also German as an example. Why would anyone do that? Your proposal is focused on one country, I think that is the problem. Quote Link to comment
+PISA-caching Posted January 8, 2021 Share Posted January 8, 2021 14 hours ago, sernikk said: Your proposal is focused on one country, I think that is the problem. That's not the case I think. There are other countries having those signs and just like the chronograms, that are hardly to find in the USA/Canada, have passed peer review, the fact that DAR/SAR sites are hardly to be found in other countries, is no argument for me to deny the category. But the redundancy with other categories like the Signs of History, the many categories for historical markers in various countries/states etc. sounds like a good argument against the category. 3 Quote Link to comment
+Ariberna Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 I see a lot of arguments against. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.