Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 4
u rack i smack

Deleted Logs

Recommended Posts

I have been making a mistake for awhile now. Most of the time when I would find a cache I would not physically sign the log if I didn't have a pen with me or the log was full or too small to write on, thinking I am going to log on my device or computer that" I found it". So Is It common practice for the CO to delete my log for doing this? If they do, I can see if people are logging" I found it" online but not actually finding it or even looking for the cache, but really who would do this?

Share this post


Link to post

Afraid you’re unlikely to get a lot of sympathy here...

 

Signing the log book is the proof that you found the cache.  It’s pretty much the first rule of Geocaching.  Not all COs will compare online logs to the physical logbook, but some do.

 

Most COs will accept an alternative form of proof, such as a (non-spoiling) photo of the log book, but some take the “no signy, no smiley” mantra very seriously.

 

The trickier the cache, the more likely the CO is to enforce the rule.

Share this post


Link to post
4 hours ago, u rack i smack said:

I have been making a mistake for awhile now. Most of the time when I would find a cache I would not physically sign the log if I didn't have a pen with me or the log was full or too small to write on, thinking I am going to log on my device or computer that" I found it". So Is It common practice for the CO to delete my log for doing this? If they do, I can see if people are logging" I found it" online but not actually finding it or even looking for the cache, but really who would do this?

 

If you actually did find the cache, here's a tip: Never write in your online log that you didn't sign the log. Many COs will delete a find if someone writes that they didn't sign the log. If an owner is going to delete a log he can check his physical log to confirm. Of course, if the cache owner checks the physical logsheet and doesn't see your signature on the sheet, he can then delete your log. (Except when it's a group/team find, then anyone that is on that team is allowed to log a find no matter if they visited the cache as intended or not. They could be waiting in the car but get to log it as a find.)

Consider making some kind of mark on the sheet then noting in your online log that you left a mark ("Used a twig and crushed leaf to leave a green stain"). Did you take a photo of the cache? Some COs might accept your found log with photo evidence that you had the cache in hand. I will often leave a mark and take a photo. I've never been asked by a CO for proof, but I have it if needed. 

 

Edited by L0ne.R

Share this post


Link to post

We've checked all logs for signatures on our caches that were 3T and up.   Other folks made a true effort to get there.

Lesser caches, we'll check if we get a mail saying a faker (by logs...) ran through, or notice a log that pretty-much shows they weren't even in the area.

 - They're mostly left for new folks learning the hobby, so we don't bother otherwise.

 

Can't tell you how many times we had "log full" logs, to find the other side of the pages untouched.  Paper has two sides...

"Too small to write on" wouldn't be a good-enough reason to fake a find (for us) either.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
52 minutes ago, u rack i smack said:

If they do, I can see if people are logging" I found it" online but not actually finding it or even looking for the cache, but really who would do this?

 

We're to assume you're the honest one after a look at the log finds a few signatures missing?       :)

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, u rack i smack said:

I can see if people are logging" I found it" online but not actually finding it or even looking for the cache, but really who would do this?

 

Search this forum for “armchair logging”.  They walk (though not very far) among us...

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, u rack i smack said:

if I didn't have a pen with me or the log was full or too small to write on, thinking I am going to log on my device or computer that" I found it".

 

Have a pen with you.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
8 minutes ago, kunarion said:

 

Have a pen with you.

^^This. Why would you go caching without a pen? I have never seen a log that was too small to write on. Full log? write in the margins and file a NM.

 

What you think if you went to a lot of trouble to create a nice cache in an interesting area, and someone claimed that they found the cache but didn't sign the log fecause they "forgot their pen"?

  • Upvote 1
  • Helpful 1

Share this post


Link to post
5 minutes ago, Mockingbird559 said:

What you think if you went to a lot of trouble to create a nice cache in an interesting area, and someone claimed that they found the cache but didn't sign the log fecause they "forgot their pen"?

It wouldn't matter much to me. If I created "a nice cache in an interesting area", I'd feel it's more important that the person was able to have that experience than worry about whether they signed the log or not. Yes, it would be nice if they could sign the log, but sometimes "things happen" and you find yourself without a way of signing the log. Give me some proof that you were there and I'd be happy as a clam.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Mockingbird559 said:

Why would you go caching without a pen? I have never seen a log that was too small to write on. Full log? write in the margins and file a NM.

Meh. I always carry 3 pens in my pocket, but it hasn't prevented me from finding myself holding a cache without a pen. I can't exactly say why because each time is different. But the fact that it can happen even to the most reasonable and careful geocache doesn't change the fact that the CO can deny my find if I don't sign the log.

 

I don't file NMs for full logs, but that's because I can always sign a full log, it's just that sometimes my signature is over top of an older signature. It may make both signatures illegible, but that's not really my problem since I did sign the log. (Although in practice I find that almost always when a log is full, it's old enough that some of the early signatures have faded out.)

 

1 hour ago, Mockingbird559 said:

What you think if you went to a lot of trouble to create a nice cache in an interesting area, and someone claimed that they found the cache but didn't sign the log fecause they "forgot their pen"?

I'd be glad I put the cache out because one more person enjoyed it. Why would them forgetting their pen enter into it, even if I did decide to delete their find logs because I didn't believe them?

Share this post


Link to post

The few times I have found myself without a pen (I usually carry two in case one runs out of ink), I have found other ways to prove I was there, and it's always been excepted. Once I picked up a piece of charcoal and made a mark on the log. I photographed this, as charcoal can rub off and included the photograph in my online log. Other times an apology to the CO for being silly enough to leave a pen behind, and a photograph of the log has been accepted. I have yet to find someone who will not accept a photograph, but then again, I have only failed to bring a pen on 3 or 4 occasions, so haven't tested this widely.

I will not accept a log claim without a signature or other proof, such as a photograph. I have also accepted a detailed description.

Share this post


Link to post
On 10/12/2018 at 9:48 AM, cerberus1 said:

 

 

Can't tell you how many times we had "log full" logs, to find the other side of the pages untouched.  Paper has two sides...

 

This is so obvious - but is often overlooked 

Share this post


Link to post
On 10/12/2018 at 5:27 PM, IceColdUK said:

Afraid you’re unlikely to get a lot of sympathy here...

 

u rack i smack, you have my sympathy.

 

In the end it is all about having fun while being respectful to each other.

 

As an owner I (the following lines are subjective!) want you to find my cache and if the logbook is protected by any trick lock or something else you should open that, too. You should sign the log if possible (as that are the rules) but if there is any good reason you can't do that (no pen, full logbook, box jammed or frozen in the winter time) you can proof your find in any other way: send me a photograph, send my a description or just tell me honestly how it was, I usually do not see any reason not to believe you.

 

If you find one my caches please do not

- open them with force if the box is jammed

- overwrite other logs if the logbook is full

- use mud or blood to sign a log

That may destroy the container or make the logbook unsightly which I dislike more than you not writing some letters in a book. (If you have a cache owner demanding on the signature do so; it is his problem then what happens to the box and the logbook.)

 

If there is a problem with the cache (e. g. it won't open as intended, rust or something like that) please tell me. You got the clue not to tell if you didn't sign the log which meant not to alert the owner in such a case - forget about the hint and report such problems. That is important to keep the cache going.

 

And now that is the objective part: If you don't sign the logbook the owner may delete your online log considering the rules. But I do not know many cachers that would really do so. There are better reasons for a log deletion...

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
On ‎10‎/‎12‎/‎2018 at 5:30 PM, The A-Team said:

It wouldn't matter much to me. If I created "a nice cache in an interesting area", I'd feel it's more important that the person was able to have that experience than worry about whether they signed the log or not. Yes, it would be nice if they could sign the log, but sometimes "things happen" and you find yourself without a way of signing the log. Give me some proof that you were there and I'd be happy as a clam.

                                                                                                                                                        

This sounds about right!

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, justintim1999 said:
On 10/12/2018 at 10:30 PM, The A-Team said:

It wouldn't matter much to me. If I created "a nice cache in an interesting area", I'd feel it's more important that the person was able to have that experience than worry about whether they signed the log or not. Yes, it would be nice if they could sign the log, but sometimes "things happen" and you find yourself without a way of signing the log. Give me some proof that you were there and I'd be happy as a clam.

                                                                                                                                                        

This sounds about right!

 

On 10/15/2018 at 2:17 AM, funkymunkyzone said:
On 10/14/2018 at 11:28 AM, frostengel said:

 

In the end it is all about having fun while being respectful to each other.

 

 

The voice of reason! :)

 

u rack i smack, you got more sympathy than I expected!  For the record, I'm with these guys.  I've never deleted a log, though I have messaged a few new players to remind them that not all CO's are as nice as me. ;-)  Have fun.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post

I should also note that while I don't normally check the physical logs of my caches against the online logs, I do have one cache where I do. It has a trick to it, whereby if you haven't signed the log, then you're really missing out on the cache. I compare the logs periodically and have deleted a few logs from cachers who had failed to sign the physical log. So, while it isn't common, there are certain caches and COs who will check and delete logs.

 

In summary, sign the log if possible. If not, you'll be okay most of the time, but you may have the occasional log deleted.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 4

×