+barefootjeff Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 45 minutes ago, thebruce0 said: 12 hours ago, Nomex said: 18 hours ago, dprovan said: Reviewers have told us that GS has told them they are responsible for policing cache quality and that each reviewer is required to have a reviewer process that uses the CHS to identify bad caches and consider unilateral action. Citation needed. Geez! I thought I'd missed something, so I went back and checked the Volunteer Expectation page, and I didn't see any reference to the CHS or "quality". Did you turn on your special text highlighting function that shows the hidden fine print only visible to reviewers? I mean, it has to be there, so you must be missing something. (likewise, I've never heard from a reviewer that they are required to use the CHS tool, and on the contrary, have only ever heard that the tool has helped them do their job; of course, that's all *I* have heard, so I'm not speaking omnisciently) I think this might be what dprovan was referring to, where Keystone said, "To clarify, all reviewers worldwide are obligated to have a system for monitoring caches with low health scores." Quote Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.