Jump to content

New locationless cache ?


Arne1

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, arisoft said:

From guidelines: "Tasks for the finder to fulfill at the location (for example, find five statues on the buildings around you and post the picture of the tallest one with your log)."

In this official example there is five pre-determined waypoints at the one location. There seems to be no limit how many waypoints are allowed, but you have to be on that location which is at posted coordinates. The size of the location is no specified. Location could be a building or a park for example.

 

All this talk of waypoints is irrelevant. That has nothing to do with the matter at hand. The point is that the task (and the result of completing the task) should be the same for everyone. In the example you quoted above, everyone would end up with the same result, because there's only one "tallest statue" of the five statues. It doesn't say that they can take their picture with any of the five statues. With your earlier example of GC7B78E, all finders need to visit the same locations, so the task is the same for everyone and they should always get the same result. With pri0n's cache, the task is not the same for everyone and there can be different results.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, The A-Team said:

All this talk of waypoints is irrelevant. That has nothing to do with the matter at hand. The point is that the task (and the result of completing the task) should be the same for everyone. In the example you quoted above, everyone would end up with the same result, because there's only one "tallest statue" of the five statues. It doesn't say that they can take their picture with any of the five statues. With your earlier example of GC7B78E, all finders need to visit the same locations, so the task is the same for everyone and they should always get the same result. With pri0n's cache, the task is not the same for everyone and there can be different results.

 

You have found wisely that given examples are not comprehensive but your claims seems to be false because this evidence refute your argumentation.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...