justintim1999 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, Team Microdot said: Ah - OK - I might have misread. It might be that the reviewer is following up on the earlier disablement - with no regard to the throwdown or the subsequent finds on it. you didn't miss it. I don't think I explained it in the original post. Your right though. The reviewer has ignored the current finds and even a note by the throw downer that the cache is fine. 1 Quote Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.