Demonising the DNF
I see the latest iteration of the Help Centre page 3.2 When a cache needs maintenance says to select the NA option if:
Isn't that a bit over the top, especially if it's just a few DNFs and no NMs?
Some caches, especially D2 or higher, can be a bit tricky to find and will generate DNFs even if the cache isn't missing, then of course there's all the DNFs (like nearby muggles, approaching storms, couldn't climb the tree, etc.) that have nothing to do with the cache status. Or is the CO
Indeed. The email I got back in December four days after just one DNF on a seven-week-old D2/T5 cache, taken at face value, gave me three options - immediately visit the cache and fix the problem (not trivial on a T5 cache), disable it until I could, or archive it. Sure there were some weasel words in there that a lawyer could say meant I could just ignore it, but my training as an engineer says that when a problem is reported, ignoring it is never the correct response.
What I really wanted