+Pond Bird Posted July 12, 2016 Author Share Posted July 12, 2016 (edited) Looking at my finds from that user it was more than 2 so I miscounted. But since the "Letterbox" cache doesn't have a stamp it shouldn't be listed as a Letterbox Hybrid. You seem to have a Draconian attitude to situations that don't meet every minute detail of the Guidelines. Maybe it was an oversight by the CO not putting a stamp in it, but unilaterally deciding it Needs Maintenance / Archive is a little severe. And trying to drum up support for your view point isn't constructive. I'm not saying it needs archived. I don't know what "Draconian" is a reference to and I was asking about if I should post a Needs Maintenance since it appears to be a stampless "letterbox" cache. And earlier in this thread you accused the reviewer and cache owner of publishing caches that were incorrectly classified. Maybe a little extra reading on your part then asking a question about why they are traditional caches instead of implying incorrect handling would be a better approach. Where does it say Field Puzzles have to be listed as traditional caches? Why are you saying that field puzzles should be listed as Traditional even though they have puzzle elements? Edited July 12, 2016 by Pond Bird Quote Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.