Jump to content

Geocaching on the Moon?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Wouldn't it be called something different, then? Lunacaching?

 

If study of the earth is geology, study of the moon is selenology, and study of Mars is aerology, I think Lunar caching, properly, would be Selenocaching and Martian caching, properly, would be Aerocaching

Posted (edited)

It would be:

 

1. Commercial ($$$ to get there).

2. You'd have to interact with employees of a business.

3. landowners permission ??

 

So reading the guidelines the caches would never be published.

 

Measuring up coordinates and afterwards seekers navigating would be a challenge. Given the narrow angle to "see", let alone receive the earth orbiting satellites there's no way to get even approximate coordinates. And then there's "the dark side of the moon" B)

Edited by on4bam
Posted

It would be:

 

1. Commercial ($$$ to get there).

2. You'd have to interact with employees of a business.

3. landowners permission ??

 

So reading the guidelines the caches would never be published.

 

Measuring up coordinates and afterwards seekers navigating would be a challenge. Given the narrow angle to "see", let alone receive the earth orbiting satellites there's no way to get even approximate coordinates. And then there's "the dark side of the moon" B)

 

And yet there is an active hide on the ISS.

Posted (edited)

It would be:

 

1. Commercial ($$$ to get there).

2. You'd have to interact with employees of a business.

3. landowners permission ??

 

So reading the guidelines the caches would never be published.

 

Measuring up coordinates and afterwards seekers navigating would be a challenge. Given the narrow angle to "see", let alone receive the earth orbiting satellites there's no way to get even approximate coordinates. And then there's "the dark side of the moon" B)

 

And yet there is an active hide on the ISS.

 

I know. And that's why I think that it's wrong to always deny cachelistings where even vague hints of commercialism or where there is interaction with employees needed (eventhough it's clearly stated there's no obligation to buy something).

Just look at this post where "interaction with employees" and "commercial" are already seen as an hurdle to get a nature walk cache series approved.

There are several instances of "do as I say, not as I do", unfortunately.

Edited by on4bam
Posted

Right then, let's go do it!

 

:lol:

Let's do it!

 

Now, does anyone happen to have a spare satellite constellation lying around that we can turn into the SPS (Selenographic Positioning System)? :laughing:

 

It would be:

1. Commercial ($$$ to get there).

2. You'd have to interact with employees of a business.

There wouldn't be an issue if you use your own spacecraft. The last time I checked, there are no commercial businesses operating on the moon.

 

3. landowners permission ??

Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies - Article VI

The activities of non-governmental entities in outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate State Party to the Treaty.

It looks like you'd have to get permission from your government to hide a cache. If you can secure permission, though, then you're good to go! :grin:

Posted

It would be:

 

1. Commercial ($$$ to get there).

2. You'd have to interact with employees of a business.

3. landowners permission ??

 

So reading the guidelines the caches would never be published.

 

Measuring up coordinates and afterwards seekers navigating would be a challenge. Given the narrow angle to "see", let alone receive the earth orbiting satellites there's no way to get even approximate coordinates. And then there's "the dark side of the moon" B)

 

And yet there is an active hide on the ISS.

 

I know. And that's why I think that it's wrong to always deny cachelistings where even vague hints of commercialism or where there is interaction with employees needed (eventhough it's clearly stated there's no obligation to buy something).

Just look at this post where "interaction with employees" and "commercial" are already seen as an hurdle to get a nature walk cache series approved.

There are several instances of "do as I say, not as I do", unfortunately.

But in this thread we're talking about caches in Space, which is fun, and not talking about commercial caches on Earth. That is why Geocaching HQ found it necessary to add the listing guideline I quoted in Post #2. That guideline overrides the "Yeah, but what about this..." situations that you delight in raising in order to take discussions off-topic.

Posted

It would be:

 

1. Commercial ($$ to get there).

 

That's not inherently a barrier to a lunar cache. I spend money to get to caches all the time ... entrance fees for state parks, admissions fees for zoos, and so on.

Posted

It would be:

 

1. Commercial ($$$ to get there).

2. You'd have to interact with employees of a business.

3. landowners permission ??

 

So reading the guidelines the caches would never be published.

 

Measuring up coordinates and afterwards seekers navigating would be a challenge. Given the narrow angle to "see", let alone receive the earth orbiting satellites there's no way to get even approximate coordinates. And then there's "the dark side of the moon" B)

 

And yet there is an active hide on the ISS.

Posted

"ISS" means "International Space Station," which hosts a geocache. (Well, a travel bug actually, but rules were bent considering the novelty of the location!)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...