Logging TBs all at once

[+GArunner]

Never mind! Figured it all out.

Edited October 20, 2013 by GArunner

[+dprovan]

My opinion is that if they aren't individually important enough for you to log them one by one, you shouldn't log them at all.

[+GArunner]

My opinion is that if they aren't individually important enough for you to log them one by one, you shouldn't log them at all.

 

You are totally right. I will take my time inputting them all and enjoying the memory of the finds.

[+Frank Broughton]

My opinion is that if they aren't individually important enough for you to log them one by one, you shouldn't log them at all.

 

How is that so?

[+dprovan]

My opinion is that if they aren't individually important enough for you to log them one by one, you shouldn't log them at all.

How is that so?

That's a really good question. I think the fundamental objection is that if you're logging them in bulk, you can't really confirm that you saw every one, so you shouldn't say you definitely saw every one.

 

Of course, there's also the background noise of what's the point of logging them at all if they aren't individual experiences. If you're not putting TB specific information in your log that would be interesting to the TO, then logging the TB is just a strange numbers game.

[+Frank Broughton]

... and indeed it is just that, a strange numbers game! lol

[CacheCoeur]

That makes me wonder: if better technology were available to log/register/track, would we be moving more TBs than we're currently inclined to do?

It is also fun to think what would it be of TB moving if NO technology were available to track them