+W8TTS Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 What ever happened to adding NANO as a cache size? It was proposed some time ago, and the lackeys said that it was coming and all they had to do was work it out with the "other" software providers. Quote Link to comment
+niraD Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Good question... http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=285144 http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=300592 http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=304571 http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=304927 Quote Link to comment
+J Grouchy Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Good question... http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=285144 http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=300592 http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=304571 http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=304927 Ahahahahaha! This pretty much sums up every feature request in here... Quote Link to comment
Moun10Bike Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Adding "nano" as a size has a lot of consequences - it will affect GPS devices and software, will require an overhaul of the cache submission forms and all pages related to cache size, and will require an update to the GPX schema. A planned overhaul of the GPX schema was scuttled a while back by management, but many of us are campaigning to get it going again. In any case, adding "nano" and all of the changes required for it are being discussed. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.