ArtMan Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 I know this is an old complaint, but here's another case where a RESET station has apparently been set after the original disk was destroyed, and a bunch of folks logged it as if the "RESET 1971" stamping on the disk had somehow magically morphed on the original disk from the "1922" stamping listed on the datasheet. I guess we should be thankful that no one filed an erroneous NGS report. C 45 (MA1033), Brookville, Pa. ArtMan Quote Link to comment
+Yeah_meoW Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 (edited) What bugs me is people who log a find but don't post a photo if the benchmark! Edited August 17, 2013 by Yeah_meoW Quote Link to comment
kayakbird Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 What bugs me is people who log a find but don't post a photo if the benchmark! And Founds being logged when a Note would explain the circumstances of the true geodetic mapping point not being seen. MEL Quote Link to comment
ArtMan Posted August 18, 2013 Author Share Posted August 18, 2013 What bugs me is people who log a find but don't post a photo if the benchmark! What bugs me even more is when they post a photo that clearly is not the mark described! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.