Order of caches

[+bertuz]

Hi!

 

I found 7 caches in 2nd June.

 

I logged the two first caches that I found the same day, 2n June.

Today, 5th June, I logged the 5 other caches (geocaching.com date selector format is new!)

 

What happens? The 2 first caches appears in the list like the 2 last caches! My milestone number 300 is wrong, and the order of the last 7 caches too! It's like:

<-(older) 3rd,4th,5th,6th,7th,1st,2nd (new)->

 

Maybe it's for the last update in geocaching.com website (changes in the date selector format in the register page of a new found).

Edited June 5, 2013 by bertuz

[Pup Patrol]

Hi!

 

I found 7 caches in 2nd June.

 

I logged the two first caches that I found the same day, 2n June.

Today, 5th June, I logged the 5 other caches (geocaching.com date selector format is new!)

 

What happens? The 2 first caches appears in the list like the 2 last caches! My milestone number 300 is wrong, and the order of the last 7 caches too! It's like:

<-(older) 3rd,4th,5th,6th,7th,1st,2nd (new)->

 

Maybe it's for the last update in geocaching.com website (changes in the date selector format in the register page of a new found).

 

You can edit your milestones:

 

http://www.geocaching.com/my/statistics_edit.aspx

 

 

B.

[+bertuz]

Thanks Pup Patrol! I successfully changed my milestone!

 

The ordenation bug is still ON.

Edited June 5, 2013 by bertuz

[Pup Patrol]

Thanks Pup Patrol! I successfully changed my milestone!

 

The ordenation bug is still ON.

 

No problem. It's a little known thing, I think, and I only learned about it through the forums.

 

But, yeah, the order thing is still a problem.

 

 

B.

[+bertuz]

Hi?

 

Nobody (from geocaching.com) is checking the bug?

[Moun10Bike]

I have confirmed that the timestamp on logs posted since the last site release is inconsistent with how we've been doing it for the last 13 years. I've entered a bug for engineering to investigate.

[+bertuz]

Ok! Thanks Moun10Bike!

 

The users who found bugs in the geocaching website should be rewarded with a free premium membership!

[+bertuz]

Any solution?

[+TOcowboy]

Concerning the new software program regarding the logging of finds; if one has posted a log noting a "final find" for that day, all is good, as that final find log stays the same at the end. However, if one should work thru a "Milestone" and post a log as such, then at a future time, adds a prior missed log find to that date, the "Milestone" find goes out of order in the sequence and is changed from the proper one as noted in the posting. Is that the way it's going to be now?

[+bertuz]

Moun10Bike, are there any news from the bug you've entered for engineering to investigate? Any sollution?

 

Thanks

[Moun10Bike]

The issue was corrected on June 11. Timestamps on logs posted to the web site are now back to the same time that they used to be prior to the last release. There will still be issues if you mix logs from the web site with those from an API-enabled app.