Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 36
Atlas Cached

New Garmin Oregon 600 Series

Recommended Posts

Well, whatever. If they're smart, they'll do EVERYTHING to ensure compatibility with any and all new Garmin units.

 

Oh they will. As you said, you can't alienate a large section of your users.

 

Particularly as some of us users will just write a conversion program to move GPX file data to GGZ format. Heck it'll probably only be the work of a few minutes. shifty.gif

 

:)Hack We Must :)

 

I like the way you think. ;)

Share this post


Link to post

Well, whatever. If they're smart, they'll do EVERYTHING to ensure compatibility with any and all new Garmin units.

 

Oh they will. As you said, you can't alienate a large section of your users.

 

That's not what Atlas said.

Share this post


Link to post

Well, whatever. If they're smart, they'll do EVERYTHING to ensure compatibility with any and all new Garmin units.

 

Oh they will. As you said, you can't alienate a large section of your users.

 

That's not what Atlas said.

 

Atlas isn't Groundspeak.

 

Atlas is also an Opencaching Ambassador, too, so there just might be a hint of bias. :ph34r:

 

 

 

.

Edited by Arthur & Trillian

Share this post


Link to post

Atlas is also an Opencaching Ambassador, too, so there just might be a hint of bias. :ph34r:

 

 

 

.

 

Ah, ulterior motive. I see...

Share this post


Link to post

 

Oh they will. As you said, you can't alienate a large section of your users.

 

That's not what Atlas said.

 

Atlas isn't Groundspeak.

 

Atlas is also an Opencaching Ambassador, too, so there just might be a hint of bias. :ph34r:

 

 

Atlas also has had personal conversation about the lack of cooperation between Groundspeak and Garmin with two of the original founders at Groundspeak, and I can report they made it very clear to me they have bad feeling toward Garmin and will not be cooperating with Garmin in the future.

 

Now, we will just have to wait and see....

Edited by Atlas Cached

Share this post


Link to post

 

Ah, ulterior motive. I see...

 

Only motivation is to prepare those reading this thread for disappointment after they realize Groundspeak will not be playing well with future Garmin products.

Share this post


Link to post

Only motivation is to prepare those reading this thread for disappointment after they realize Groundspeak will not be playing well with future Garmin products.

 

It can only help Groundspeak to get their stuff running on the new Garmins. And, I'm betting they will. It works on all the currently compatible stuff, right?

 

And, regarding your "personal conversation", if they don't "get with the times"? Well, I won't be shedding any tears in my beer if they suddenly find themselves irrelevant if/when something else takes over.

Edited by sviking

Share this post


Link to post

 

Ah, ulterior motive. I see...

 

Only motivation is to prepare those reading this thread for disappointment after they realize Groundspeak will not be playing well with future Garmin products.

 

As long as Groundspeak exports GPX and garmin imports GPX I am not too worried. And I am 100% confident this will not change.

 

Some of the new fancy features not being supported by Groundspeak ? perhaps, but as long as I can load up the standard cache information I'm cool with it. No way I am switching to another system after logging caches on gc.com for 7+ years no matter what other extra features they might have

Share this post


Link to post

 

Not really, just more speculation.

 

Perhaps the first place to look for samples would be trying to do a download of a cache from OpenCaching and see what the file looks like. I expect that will be available before the new units ship.

Share this post


Link to post

If the 600 won't accept GPX files I won't be getting one anytime soon......dang, it looked pretty good.

 

Well, I don't think I have seen reports either way about whether the new Oregons will accept GPX or not. They might, after all...who knows? That's not to say that someone wouldn't be able to come up with a converter really quickly even if they did end up dropping GPX. Either way, I think it'd be stupid to shut out GPX altogether.

Edited by Arthur & Trillian

Share this post


Link to post

I do not believe they will be limiting GPX file compatibility. Too many other uses that are integral to using a GPSr.

Edited by Atlas Cached

Share this post


Link to post

I do not believe they will be limiting GPX file compatibility. Too many other uses that are integral to using a GPSr.

So, exactly how many geocaches (in GPX files, not GGZ files) will the 600 series hold? It's obviously not unlimited, since to get this "feature" you have to play by Garmin's rules, not the rules of the rest of the world. That could well be a make-or-break spec for mainstream geocachers.

 

--Larry

Share this post


Link to post

I do not believe they will be limiting GPX file compatibility. Too many other uses that are integral to using a GPSr.

So, exactly how many geocaches (in GPX files, not GGZ files) will the 600 series hold? It's obviously not unlimited, since to get this "feature" you have to play by Garmin's rules, not the rules of the rest of the world. That could well be a make-or-break spec for mainstream geocachers.

 

--Larry

 

That spec has not yet been published. I want to know as much as anyone else, so I can update the wiki :)

Share this post


Link to post

I was wondering if the GGZ format "in concept" might be similar to the GPI format (and possibly with a new "loader") where the only limitation is the size of the memory card. I'm not a programmer so I don't know if that would even be possible. I'm sure changes would be required to handle the different functionality required for caches instead of POIs.

 

The current "POI loader" of course converts a GPX file to a GPI .

Edited by Grasscatcher

Share this post


Link to post

I do not believe they will be limiting GPX file compatibility. Too many other uses that are integral to using a GPSr.

So, exactly how many geocaches (in GPX files, not GGZ files) will the 600 series hold? It's obviously not unlimited, since to get this "feature" you have to play by Garmin's rules, not the rules of the rest of the world. That could well be a make-or-break spec for mainstream geocachers.

 

--Larry

 

Wild guess here - no less than Montana or Oregon 400 :)

Share this post


Link to post

I do not believe they will be limiting GPX file compatibility. Too many other uses that are integral to using a GPSr.

So, exactly how many geocaches (in GPX files, not GGZ files) will the 600 series hold? It's obviously not unlimited, since to get this "feature" you have to play by Garmin's rules, not the rules of the rest of the world. That could well be a make-or-break spec for mainstream geocachers.

 

--Larry

 

Wild guess here - no less than Montana or Oregon 400 :)

 

That's a big range (12,000 caches Montana and 2,000 caches Oregon 400).

Share this post


Link to post

In Linux, tgz is a tar file compressed with gzip. Maybe ggz is gpx compressed with gzip.

 

I suspect GGZ is Garmin Geocache Zip

Edited by Atlas Cached

Share this post


Link to post

In Linux, tgz is a tar file compressed with gzip. Maybe ggz is gpx compressed with gzip.

 

I suspect GGZ is Garmin Geocache Zip

How did you determine that?

Share this post


Link to post

Im wondering if this new format was created because of what Garmin calls Adventures that can be created in Basecamp that works as a container like the same way as a MKV file!

As I understand an "adventure" can be made of several things like a route, a cache, a road trip, etc and I think GPX is not able to have all of that.

Just a guess.

Share this post


Link to post
If the 600 won't accept GPX files I won't be getting one anytime soon......dang, it looked pretty good.

According to this Garmin blog (see section "Unlimited Geocaching"), GPX files will still be supported.

Share this post


Link to post

Groundspeak will actively work in the opposite direction in an attempt to drive geocachers away from Garmin products.

 

Why would they try to alienate what's probably their largest demographic, i.e. Garmin users?

 

Garmin's alienated a ton of people on their own with their Opencaching antics, so Groundspeak doesn't have to do a thing in that department.

 

The fatal flaws of this new system are:

 

1. It is meant to replace a very solid and favorite file system used by many programs and devices seamlessly with unknown tech, and

 

2. It's nothing more than a publicity stunt. Honestly, is there really a need to load ALL the geocaches out there on one machine, especially given that even 5000 is more than virtually anyone needs at one time?

 

They are trying to introduce a file standard that just isn't needed.

.

Actually, yes there is a need. Why do you think so many people like geocaching with their smartphones(and don't feel the need to purchase a dedicated GPSr)? Because they can go caching on-the-fly without the need to pre-plan cache trips ahead of time. They can just whip out their phone and have access to an unlimited amount of caches. No need to create PQs limited to 1000. No need to go through the trouble of figuring out how to best optimize those PQs, etc.

Now with this new file type, Garmin can effectively do the same with a gpsr AND you aren't limited to having a data connection to do it. These new Oregons can hold ~4 million caches with new file type and there are currently ~2 million caches on gc.com (hence how they are able to get away with using the "unlimited" term). If you still want to filter out certain caches, the Oregon has that built-in so you can do that on-the-fly too.

In an ideal world, i'd own one of these new Oregons and gc.com would make PQs less restrictive with the new file-type. I'd then be able to use my Oregon like I use my smartphone and only have to update my Oregon every so often(once a month maybe).

 

Share this post


Link to post

My wishful thinking/guess on GGZ files is that they are simply zip'd GPX files -- and that new Garmin devices will be able to read the and ZIP files without unpacking/unzipping them first.

 

Throw in bluetooth file transfer to get them wirelessly to GPS from computer or smartphone, and it's be perfect.

Edited by user13371

Share this post


Link to post

Okay, please humor me a moment here. Dyslexic old fart...

 

Wording in threads seems Garmin, realizing they're losing out to the phone crowd, has figured a way to turn their devices into high-end Geomate Jrs.

- Is that about right?

Share this post


Link to post

See here for an update:

 

http://gpstracklog.c...ile-format.html

To quote from that update:

 

"The Oregon can hold an unlimited number of geocaches and supports GPX files from OpenCaching.com for downloading geocaches and details straight to the unit." [emphasis added].

 

Could this be a hint that GPX files from other sources can't be used? One would hope they wouldn't make such a suicidal move, but based on that wording, I have to wonder.

 

I have no particular reason to want to "update" from my Oregon 550t, but I certainly wouldn't even think about the 600 series until these ambiguities are cleared up.

 

--Larry

Share this post


Link to post

Since Garmin has been in a urination festival with Groundspeak for awhile now, they would not plug their competition's web site in their own marketing materials.

 

GPX files are not specific to Geocaching, so for Garmin to outright exclude them would be commercial suicide.

 

On the oddball chance that Garmin did excluded GPX files, I am sure someone would come up with a way to make it work.

 

Either way, the Oregon 600 is the unit I am interested in as my next GPS, but i will not purchase one until I know 100% that it supports GPX files the same way my eTrex 20 does right now.

Share this post


Link to post

GPX files are not specific to Geocaching, so for Garmin to outright exclude them would be commercial suicide.

That update on GPSTrackLog specifically mentions GPX files, so Garmin isn't excluding the general file type. However, what I'm concerned about is the possibility of their putting some sort of screwy constraint on the contents of the files, ones that would cause the unit to choke on Groundspeak's extensions to the standard.

 

Until someone confirms that GPX files from Groundspeak, including pocket queries, can be read by a 600 series GPS without loss of any functionality, I'm not interested.

 

--Larry

Share this post


Link to post
... in threads seems Garmin, realizing they're losing out to the phone crowd, has figured a way to turn their devices into high-end Geomate Jrs. - Is that about right?

Nope, that's tunnel vision. Garmin embraces smartphones, and offers lot of software and services on iOS and Android - including OpenCaching apps.

 

As for "losing out to the phone crowd" that may be true in terms of the market segment of "handheld navigation units for finding geocaches" (and some portion of the car navigation market). But it may come as a surprise to some folks here that Geocaching is really a tiny segment of the overall market for GPS devices.

Edited by user13371

Share this post


Link to post

Just a guess about GGZ format (which I've already mentioned elsewhere)... I expect GGZ to be for Garmin pretty much was KMZ is to Google Earth – zipped bundle of many other file type(s). Would not surprise me if it contains GPX as well as other file types internally – geotagged images, map bundles, etc.

 

The big gain in usability there if Basecamp will package it and you send it over one file, instead of a bunch of different files and types. Really, it amazes me today that you can’t even drop a zip’t GPX file into your GPS, that you have to unzip it first. How many bytes do you need to write a zip/unzip routine?

Share this post


Link to post
If the 600 won't accept GPX files I won't be getting one anytime soon......dang, it looked pretty good.

According to this Garmin blog (see section "Unlimited Geocaching"), GPX files will still be supported.

 

Garmin are not stupid enough to stop the new Oregon 6xx series from importing GPX files. Why would they ?? Just because they have come up with a clever way of zipping and importing 1000's of geocaches from their own Opencaching website ( and why shouldnt they) doesnt mean that non Opencaching user will be able to use it. If they did they wouldnt sell any.

 

I have a Etrex 30 and it doesnt import photos from the pocket queries from Geocaching.com. Appartently this feature only works with Opencaching.com. Its annoying but not the end of the world.

 

Garmin are just trying to get more people to use their own website.

 

So.. LOOK forward to this new device and stop slagging it off until the facts are found out. Why doesnt someone ask Garmin to do a English video review then all might be revealed.

Share this post


Link to post

Any chance we could get back to discussing GPS units and file formats, sometime this weekend?

 

Any thoughts on my earlier guess that GGZ will be a zip file containing multiple other files, GPX, images, maps all in one bundle?

Share this post


Link to post

Any chance we could get back to discussing GPS units and file formats, sometime this weekend?

 

Any thoughts on my earlier guess that GGZ will be a zip file containing multiple other files, GPX, images, maps all in one bundle?

 

I think your guess about a multiple-file zip is a good one. I can see how it would appeal to people who want an all-in-one package, so I think it's a good possibility.

Share this post


Link to post

AFAIK all is speculation until now, nobody really knows what this new format will be and why.

Share this post


Link to post

Grumpy Moderator Note If I'd seen the behavior in this thread before it escalated, I'd have issued personal warnings to those engaged in personal attacks instead of engaging in respectful technical discussion. As it stands, I've just hidden the offending post. Those involved know who they are, so I'll issue a public request to keep this thread specifically and the forums generally civil and respectful. Failure to do so can result in having your posting privileges revoked.

 

Play nicely.

Share this post


Link to post

I have a Etrex 30 and it doesnt import photos from the pocket queries from Geocaching.com. Appartently this feature only works with Opencaching.com. Its annoying but not the end of the world.

GSAK and a macro for that!!

 

Back OT, They will support GPX files from GS...

 

1. It's an open standard used for lots of other things.

 

2. Commercial suicide if they don't.

 

It seems than Garmin are tailoring their units to work better with Open Caching, but allowing it to work with GS. I guess their idea is that users will say "hey it's so much easier on OC, lets use that"...until they look how many caches there are that is!

 

Share this post


Link to post
GPX files are not specific to Geocaching, so for Garmin to outright exclude them would be commercial suicide.

That update on GPSTrackLog specifically mentions GPX files, so Garmin isn't excluding the general file type. However, what I'm concerned about is the possibility of their putting some sort of screwy constraint on the contents of the files, ones that would cause the unit to choke on Groundspeak's extensions to the standard.

Obviously you've never look inside a GPX file from OpenCaching.com, as they contain .... wait for it... Groundspeak extensions.

 

They also contain a few minor things in a "ox:opencaching" extension, but all the real meat is in a Groundspeak extension. All the older "paperless" GPS units won't recognize the OX extension, so they have no choice but to use Groundspeak's extension.

 

I'm sure this will remain true with the newer Oregons. What I predict, is some limit, say 5000 caches if GPX, but 4 million caches if GGZ.

Share this post


Link to post

GPS City claims the unlimited geacaches are for any type of geocache, and not just Opencaching. I asked the question here:

GPS City FAQs for Oregon 650t

 

The answer did not addres the form in which this unlimited quantity are stored in.

 

Do I have to have all my caches in GGZ or can I have dozens of 1,000 cache GPX files on the unit?

Share this post


Link to post

You can be pretty certain it will need to be the new format. The GPX format just takes too much processing to go through. They need a compact and indexable format to handle large quantities of data.

Share this post


Link to post

You can be pretty certain it will need to be the new format. The GPX format just takes too much processing to go through. They need a compact and indexable format to handle large quantities of data.

 

Right you are. And my uneducated guess is that it will be a database solution. (SQL).

 

Hans

Share this post


Link to post

You can be pretty certain it will need to be the new format. The GPX format just takes too much processing to go through. They need a compact and indexable format to handle large quantities of data.

 

Right you are. And my uneducated guess is that it will be a database solution. (SQL).

 

Hans

 

Or it's compressed with an index at the top.

 

Back in my old PDP-11 days I wrote some quick indexing routines into a very compact table in the first block of a very large static file, which indicated where messages began and for how many blocks they ran. Doing fast math from indexes meant a very fast retrieval on nominally slow RP04 drives. It was for a forum, much like these, but back when drives were tiny by comparison.

Share this post


Link to post

I thought this of interesting note.

 

The Oregon 300, which is basically the same design and software build as the Oregon 450/550, has been around since July 11, 2008 (see the product description date on Amazon).

 

This means that basically, the Oregon line hasn't seen a major revision, other than light cosmetics, in nearly 5 years! Imagine any other piece of electronics with a basic production life, relatively unchanged, of 5 years. Few. Gezus, phones change weekly, tablets, desktops, laptops etc. monthly.

 

The Oregon 300/450/550 has been a great unit for many people and continues to be so to this day. I'm counting on the new Oregon 600/650 being a giant leap forward in terms of functionality and user friendliness.

Share this post


Link to post

Don't expect to much, Montana wasn't and still software wise not in order, the Garmin hardware is nice and with Oregon 600 they included the Glonass sats as a step up, but the software is a bottleneck.

Edited by splashy

Share this post


Link to post

One thing that does concern me about this new unit is whether it is using the same setup for the electronic compass as the one on the eTrex 30.

 

After 3 or 4 firmware updates, Garmin still has not been able to get it working properly on the eTrex 30.

Share this post


Link to post

One thing that does concern me about this new unit is whether it is using the same setup for the electronic compass as the one on the eTrex 30.

 

After 3 or 4 firmware updates, Garmin still has not been able to get it working properly on the eTrex 30.

 

It is very frustrating that new units get introduced ( full of bugs ) before existing units are fixed.

Share this post


Link to post

My hope and gut feeling is that since the software appears to be founded on the Montana that it will inherit the year and a half development of that product.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 36

×
×
  • Create New...