+Knights-Templar Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 Hi, So far I have been using my iphone for caching and whilst this has done the job, there have been times when it struggled for a decent signal and has been a bit bouncy. I am also now creating caches so I require something more accurate and reliable. I have been doing some research and quite like the Montana 650 and Oregon 550 for their paperless abilities. My question is if I buy either of these would I still need to buy the Garmin Northern Ireland Discoverer maps or would the maps that come with either be good enough? Thanks Gary Quote Link to comment
+dartymoor Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 As above; the free talkie toaster maps are very good. Quote Link to comment
+The Patrician Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 And when you go on holiday you can get OSM maps for anywhere from here: http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl/ Quote Link to comment
+Knights-Templar Posted January 25, 2013 Author Share Posted January 25, 2013 (edited) If I were to buy a 't' version, say a Garmin Oregon 550t, are the maps included the discoverer maps or are they inferior? Would I be better off buying a standard version and getting the talkie toaster maps seperately? Also is it worth paying the extra and getting the version with a camera (500 or 550) or is the camera just a gimmick and better off using the iphone. Just want to make sure I purchase the right version. Thanks Edited January 25, 2013 by Knights-Templar Quote Link to comment
+The Patrician Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 (edited) According to this the maps are the recreational map of Europe, not the OS maps. You'll have to buy them separately. As to cameras only you can really answer that - personally I prefer a proper camera but others views will differ. I went to Greece last summer and used OSM maps successfully when wandering various parts of the country doing a bit of caching. In this country I prefer the OS maps now I have a 62 but I have used the TT maps on my older GPS. Edited January 25, 2013 by The Patrician Quote Link to comment
+Graculus Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 (edited) The 't' on a Garmin GPS means the topo maps are included. These are NOT the Ordnance Survey Discoverer maps which are based on the OS 1:50 Landranger maps. The Discoverer maps are purchased separately (at a cost). The Garmin topo maps are of the UK and Europe and are not too bad but the Open Street Maps produced by TalkyToaster are in my opinion better than the Garmin topo ones and are free. They'll load on any Garmin GPS that supports maps. I wouldn't bother with the 't' version but use the free OSM maps and then consider getting the Discoverer ones at some point if you want them. What's the difference between these 3 maps? The Discoverer maps (OS maps) are 'raster' maps. This describes the way they appear on the screen. If you zoom in too much the maps go 'fuzzy'. The Discoverer maps are excellent (and better) than the topo/OSM maps for the country but for towns are not really that good as you can't zoom in too far. The topo and OSM maps are 'vector' maps which allows you to zoom in very close and are ideal for towns and cities where you can see detailed streets. They are not so good for the countryside as they don't have as much detail like paths, woods, water etc. I have both on my Oregon and just switch between them as needed. Have a look at my resource sitewhere I've put up screen shots of both Garmin and Magellan maps that are available. Regarding the camera on the Oregon. I have the 550 and the camera is ... OK. It's not brilliant but takes reasonable photos. I'd not consider it as my only camera! Most mobile phone cameras produce better photos. Chris Graculus Volunteer UK Reviewer for geocaching.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- UK Geocaching Wiki Geocaching.com Help Center UK Geocaching Information & Resources website Edited January 25, 2013 by Graculus Quote Link to comment
+eusty Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Sums it up very well. I've 25k OS maps on my 450 and while they are fantastic the the country, in built up areas they are pants, and I prefer the OSM ones Quote Link to comment
+Knights-Templar Posted January 29, 2013 Author Share Posted January 29, 2013 Thanks for the replies and advice everyone and the resource link Graculus. Quote Link to comment
+Boggin's Dad Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I have an Oregon 550, and it is a fantastic little piece of kit, especially with the paperless caching. I have also purchased the OS maps for it, the 1:50k series, and I find them very useful for navigating, and quite accurate too. Can be very good for finding rights of way too. As for the camera, I do like that very much, I guess it is not a patch on my canon EOS for picture quality, but the best thing is that I use GSAK for logging finds - and I download the photographs onto my my harddrive at the same time as I download my cache logs, and it is then very easy to add the photographs to my logs, by matching the time of the cache find, and the time the picture was taken. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.