+trippy1976 Posted December 13, 2002 Share Posted December 13, 2002 With the advent of GPX, it would be very valuable at times to have more than the 500 limit of caches. For instance, it would be useful to know if there are any caches in Michigan that have never been visited. Or to list the top 100 most uhm... un-recently (brain fart, best word I could come up with!) visited caches. Groups could use this information to doctor up the caches in their states or areas, run promotions or competitions, etc. It's possible to do this, I know, with the current limit by setting up multiple queries. Many times these over lap. It's not that big of a deal, but it would be convinient for organizations to have access to larger sets of data without the limit for planning purposes. -------- trippy1976 - Team KKF2A Saving geocaches - one golf ball at a time. Link to comment
+Trudy & the beast Posted December 13, 2002 Share Posted December 13, 2002 quote:Originally posted by trippy1976: ...un-recently I like that word! I think I even know what you mean by it. we need to call this a trippyism. Link to comment
+trippy1976 Posted December 13, 2002 Author Share Posted December 13, 2002 So would "trippyism" be a trudyism? -------- trippy1976 - Team KKF2A Saving geocaches - one golf ball at a time. Link to comment
+Trudy & the beast Posted December 17, 2002 Share Posted December 17, 2002 quote:Originally posted by trippy1976:So would "trippyism" be a trudyism? http://www.mi-geocaching.org/ That would make "trudyism" another trippyism. and you would be one up. Link to comment
+trippy1976 Posted December 17, 2002 Author Share Posted December 17, 2002 Dernit! -------- trippy1976 - Team KKF2A Saving geocaches - one golf ball at a time. Link to comment
Recommended Posts