Jump to content

EXTREME geocaching


easy-E-

Recommended Posts

ok on-topic lol

 

The Lost Treasure of the Confederates

 

The Labyrinth

 

Bradley's Bottom

 

WILDLIFE

 

Most extreme I have found below:

 

The Legend of Zelda

 

A string of caches on a over night canoe trip (extreme for me)

From Wateree River Run: Yaks Away to De Soto

 

Lost in the Swamp III

 

Turtlehead Peak Cache

Edited by TheLoneGrangers
Link to comment

 

If you are going to be in that area, try this cache. Its northwest of there.

 

I never climbed it but its really cool in the summer. Can be cold at night in the summer. http://coord.info/GC5CE3

 

Another mt near by is: http://coord.info/GC1QWR3

 

I was camping in this area last summer and was aware of those caches but I was with a girl that wasnt outdoor type at all, so I didnt do it.

 

Oh yes, I remember seeing Turtlehead when I was doing this cache. http://coord.info/GC18FMD

Edited by SwineFlew
Link to comment

 

If you are going to be in that area, try this cache. Its northwest of there.

 

I never climbed it but its really cool in the summer. Can be cold at night in the summer. http://coord.info/GC5CE3

 

Another mt near by is: http://coord.info/GC1QWR3

 

I was camping in this area last summer and was aware of those caches but I was with a girl that wasnt outdoor type at all, so I didnt do it.

 

Oh yes, I remember seeing Turtlehead when I was doing this cache. http://coord.info/GC18FMD

 

If I ever get the oppertunity to head back out that way those caches are difinately possible!!!

Link to comment

If you wanna know the most extreme cache in the world, I dont think you can topped this one.

 

Do this one if you wanna knock a few years off of your life. :ph34r:

 

... if it actually was real, that is.

 

Ha!

 

Cro-Magnon

 

Nemesis

 

Travelling Fugue

 

I've gotten as far as stage 5 for Nemesis, and have solved the coords for stage 1 of Travelling Fugue. Fun fun fun. The CO for these three caches has unfortunately passed, but they're all well maintained. He's got quite a few more that are pretty hairy too.

Link to comment

If you wanna know the most extreme cache in the world, I dont think you can topped this one.

 

Do this one if you wanna knock a few years off of your life. :ph34r:

 

... if it actually was real, that is.

 

What proof do you have that this is a liar's cache?

 

No proof, just going by what's posted on the cache page (esp. in the logs), and by gut feeling.

 

In that general vicinity, there are quite a few highly hazardous areas. This one isn't a high priority and it isn't likely to cause you any grief unless you start ingesting contaminated soil in large quantities. I would not worry too much about the 'radiation' suits they suggest. It is scare tactics, plain and simple but it does make it look like more fun.

 

I would like to know how they obtained permission to go on that site. I do believe it is off limits and a federal crime to be there. I sure hope anyone going there knows what they are doing.

Link to comment

If you wanna know the most extreme cache in the world, I dont think you can topped this one.

 

Do this one if you wanna knock a few years off of your life. :ph34r:

 

... if it actually was real, that is.

 

What proof do you have that this is a liar's cache?

 

No proof, just going by what's posted on the cache page (esp. in the logs), and by gut feeling.

 

Well, the CO has about 10,000 forum posts, and could answer himself. But he hasn't been heard from in years. He must not like us anymore. :lol:

Link to comment

If you wanna know the most extreme cache in the world, I dont think you can topped this one.

 

Do this one if you wanna knock a few years off of your life. :ph34r:

 

... if it actually was real, that is.

 

What proof do you have that this is a liar's cache?

 

No proof, just going by what's posted on the cache page (esp. in the logs), and by gut feeling.

 

Well, the CO has about 10,000 forum posts, and could answer himself. But he hasn't been heard from in years. He must not like us anymore. :lol:

 

well since:http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=274400&view=findpost&p=4718588 maybe they got raptured after all?

Link to comment

The most extreme caches - by far - I know of are http://coord.info/GC2WGV2 and http://coord.info/GC2WGTQ

 

There seems to be a fine line between "Extreme" caches that a good portion of the geocaching population could find if so inclined and with a fair amount effort and a cache so difficult that it becomes almost a novelty that feels like "I'm going to create a cache that almost nobody will be able to find." A cache located at a spot that requires a long and arduous hike at high elevation might take someone that isn't in the best physical condition a long time to get to (perhaps requiring camping several nights) but it would eventually be doable. There are probably not too many caches that will be able to find a cache located at the bottom of the ocean or on the ISS. The two listed above approach the novelty level rather than something that is just "extreme".

Link to comment

The most extreme caches - by far - I know of are http://coord.info/GC2WGV2 and http://coord.info/GC2WGTQ

 

There seems to be a fine line between "Extreme" caches that a good portion of the geocaching population could find if so inclined and with a fair amount effort and a cache so difficult that it becomes almost a novelty that feels like "I'm going to create a cache that almost nobody will be able to find." A cache located at a spot that requires a long and arduous hike at high elevation might take someone that isn't in the best physical condition a long time to get to (perhaps requiring camping several nights) but it would eventually be doable. There are probably not too many caches that will be able to find a cache located at the bottom of the ocean or on the ISS. The two listed above approach the novelty level rather than something that is just "extreme".

 

I would have to agree with you.

Link to comment

If you wanna know the most extreme cache in the world, I dont think you can topped this one.

 

Do this one if you wanna knock a few years off of your life. :ph34r:

 

... if it actually was real, that is.

 

What proof do you have that this is a liar's cache?

 

No proof, just going by what's posted on the cache page (esp. in the logs), and by gut feeling.

 

Well, the CO has about 10,000 forum posts, and could answer himself. But he hasn't been heard from in years. He must not like us anymore. :lol:

 

well since:http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=274400&view=findpost&p=4718588 maybe they got raptured after all?

 

That's very interesting, if you do "see forum posts from this user" from his profile, only the ones from the "new" forums show up. And I do remember he came back out of nowhere after a long absence to start that Rapture thread. I believe the Rapture was supposed to be sometime in May, 2011? :lol:

 

And I exaggerated a bit, he only has about 4,000 posts. And I do believe he was highly active in OT as well, where the posts don't count.

Link to comment

The most extreme caches - by far - I know of are http://coord.info/GC2WGV2 and http://coord.info/GC2WGTQ

 

There seems to be a fine line between "Extreme" caches that a good portion of the geocaching population could find if so inclined and with a fair amount effort and a cache so difficult that it becomes almost a novelty that feels like "I'm going to create a cache that almost nobody will be able to find." A cache located at a spot that requires a long and arduous hike at high elevation might take someone that isn't in the best physical condition a long time to get to (perhaps requiring camping several nights) but it would eventually be doable. There are probably not too many caches that will be able to find a cache located at the bottom of the ocean or on the ISS. The two listed above approach the novelty level rather than something that is just "extreme".

 

I would have to agree with you.

 

I too agree. "Extreme" is a subjective term. Caches, like the ones the above quote talk about, that are near impossible to get - imho - are not extreme, the require skill beyond what someone could get in a normal day of training. Someone mentioned the "roof of the world cache" at Everest Base Camp. Another "not extreme" cache. Why? Because you need a permit from Nepal/Tibet that cost (i think last time I heard is $70,000) to approach Everest. Extreme to me is something most cachers can do with a special equipment, a little training (a 50ft dive for example) or aches that require overnight camping/paddle trips. Long arduous caches in caves/drainage tunnles qualify to me as extreme. Multi-staged cahces that take 7 - 8 hours. Again the whole idea is very subjective to the individaul cacher I guess.

 

What I like is the feeling of excitment and apprehension certain caches give me that I know I can do, but realizse it needs planning and multiple folks. That is an adventure :-)

Link to comment

Where I live no super extreame caches exist,

nothing will impress you I think :-)

 

I liked this one

http://coord.info/GC29J2Y

 

here is my log with pictures

http://coord.info/GL7B9D5Z

 

I also liked this one:

http://coord.info/GC33W6N

I am the only finder and only one to solve it so far, so I cant reveal much !!

but it got alot of stars 5/5 :-)

 

Actually I like them a bit harder to get, higher is more thrilling, like tall trees,

bridges and dangerous places.

 

this one I did too

http://coord.info/GC3484B

 

this one

http://coord.info/GC2MN5J

I needed to construct special tool to get, very funny see my log and pictures

http://coord.info/GL6K6XR7

 

I am a scubadiver too,

so got equipment for the water stuff too..

Link to comment
Extreme to me is something most cachers can do with a special equipment, a little training (a 50ft dive for example) or aches that require overnight camping/paddle trips. Long arduous caches in caves/drainage tunnles qualify to me as extreme. Multi-staged cahces that take 7 - 8 hours. Again the whole idea is very subjective to the individaul cacher I guess.

 

That's some interesting interpretation of the word "extreme". How is something extreme if most people can do it with little effort? Shouldn't the scale go from "no effort required" to "a lot of effort required"? The far end of the scale would then be the extreme, meaning that those caches require the most effort of them all, with none requiring more than them. And caches that are nigh impossible to get to sure fit the bill.

 

There's nothing subjective to it. Unless of course you're talking "extreme within your own abilities"....

 

(and btw, a 50 ft dive is not a good idea to do after only a day of training, even though some people still do it unfortunately...)

Edited by dfx
Link to comment

The most extreme caches - by far - I know of are http://coord.info/GC2WGV2 and http://coord.info/GC2WGTQ

 

There seems to be a fine line between "Extreme" caches that a good portion of the geocaching population could find if so inclined and with a fair amount effort and a cache so difficult that it becomes almost a novelty that feels like "I'm going to create a cache that almost nobody will be able to find." A cache located at a spot that requires a long and arduous hike at high elevation might take someone that isn't in the best physical condition a long time to get to (perhaps requiring camping several nights) but it would eventually be doable. There are probably not too many caches that will be able to find a cache located at the bottom of the ocean or on the ISS. The two listed above approach the novelty level rather than something that is just "extreme".

 

I would have to agree with you.

 

I too agree. "Extreme" is a subjective term. Caches, like the ones the above quote talk about, that are near impossible to get - imho - are not extreme, the require skill beyond what someone could get in a normal day of training. Someone mentioned the "roof of the world cache" at Everest Base Camp. Another "not extreme" cache. Why? Because you need a permit from Nepal/Tibet that cost (i think last time I heard is $70,000) to approach Everest.

 

From what I read the "Roof of the World" cache is not actually at the Everest base camp (Andromeda321 described it as a "stones throw" from the Everest base camp) but it's close enough that a clear view of Everest can be seen from the cache location. I know I'm often amazed at the places that she's traveled and how she can do so financially at such a young age but I doubt that she spent $70,000 to find the "Roof of the World". Granted, getting to Tibet is probably not something your average geocacher will do, but considering that cache has 37 finds it's certainly doable, and given the altitude and location seems to be pretty extreme.

Link to comment

The most extreme caches - by far - I know of are http://coord.info/GC2WGV2 and http://coord.info/GC2WGTQ

 

There seems to be a fine line between "Extreme" caches that a good portion of the geocaching population could find if so inclined and with a fair amount effort and a cache so difficult that it becomes almost a novelty that feels like "I'm going to create a cache that almost nobody will be able to find." A cache located at a spot that requires a long and arduous hike at high elevation might take someone that isn't in the best physical condition a long time to get to (perhaps requiring camping several nights) but it would eventually be doable. There are probably not too many caches that will be able to find a cache located at the bottom of the ocean or on the ISS. The two listed above approach the novelty level rather than something that is just "extreme".

 

I would have to agree with you.

 

I too agree. "Extreme" is a subjective term. Caches, like the ones the above quote talk about, that are near impossible to get - imho - are not extreme, the require skill beyond what someone could get in a normal day of training. Someone mentioned the "roof of the world cache" at Everest Base Camp. Another "not extreme" cache. Why? Because you need a permit from Nepal/Tibet that cost (i think last time I heard is $70,000) to approach Everest.

 

From what I read the "Roof of the World" cache is not actually at the Everest base camp (Andromeda321 described it as a "stones throw" from the Everest base camp) but it's close enough that a clear view of Everest can be seen from the cache location. I know I'm often amazed at the places that she's traveled and how she can do so financially at such a young age but I doubt that she spent $70,000 to find the "Roof of the World". Granted, getting to Tibet is probably not something your average geocacher will do, but considering that cache has 37 finds it's certainly doable, and given the altitude and location seems to be pretty extreme.

 

Well, I enter a contest to win a trip to Everest Base Camp every year. Haven't won yet. :blink:

 

Here ya' go, an extreme cache. It's the "climb the mall sign in Austria" cache that 4WF doesn't like. Don't even think about it, 4WF. :laughing:

 

http://coord.info/GC1VZ85

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...