An original benchmark that's also a reset....?

[+Szuchie]

I found a benchmark today that I found pretty interesting, so I thought I would ask here as to the appropriate recovery/logging practices.

 

See the following two benchmarks, as linked below:

 

http://www.geocachin...aspx?PID=NC0508

 

http://www.geocachin...aspx?PID=AI3117

 

The first link is the is the original mark, while the other is the reset. According to the description, the disk is the original, but had to be remounted after the concrete post it is set in was hit. The post remained the same height. Should people be reporting for both, or should people only be reporting on the RESET as the original was technically "destroyed?"

 

Baffling stuff for sure...haha. Anyways, any clarification on such a unique scenario would be greatly appreciated!

[Bill93]

Broken links. Try these

http://www.geocaching.com/mark/details.aspx?PID=NC0508

http://www.geocaching.com/mark/details.aspx?PID=AI3117

 

Shame on them for not stamping RESET on the disk.

 

The older data sheet should be marked DESTROYED, and all finds logged on the newer one.

Edited August 16, 2011 by Bill93

[+Szuchie]

Broken links. Try these

My linkhttp://www.geocaching.com/mark/details.aspx?PID=NC0508

My linkhttp://www.geocaching.com/mark/details.aspx?PID=AI3117

 

Shame on them for not stamping RESET on the disk.

 

The older data sheet should be marked DESTROYED, and all finds logged on the newer one.

 

Thanks Bill. That was my first impression, but wasn't sure how that would work since the disk was essentially just patched up. I'm rather new to marking, so I figured I would ask here.

 

Thank you again!