Another one?

[+BrixingtonPaddler]

I see this

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14438239

 

I instantly think

 

http://coord.info/GCMEP5

[+Happy Humphrey]

I doubt it. Here's a photo of the container:

 

[+BrixingtonPaddler]

I doubt it. Here's a photo of the container:

 

 

True, hardly has wires with it

 

Still, it was my initial thought to see what geocaches were in that area

[+Hawkins2.5]

Lol, I avoided this one and many others in Rome because they have hundreds of people including police around everywhere and I don't like feeling conspicuous by looking for caches in highly populated places. Looks like this probably wouldn't have been too bad to find though.

[+SeekerOfTheWay]

Lol, I avoided this one and many others in Rome because they have hundreds of people including police around everywhere and I don't like feeling conspicuous by looking for caches in highly populated places. Looks like this probably wouldn't have been too bad to find though.

 

This is one reason why I skip most Stealth Required caches. I so wish virtual would come back!

[+Happy Humphrey]

Lol, I avoided this one and many others in Rome because they have hundreds of people including police around everywhere and I don't like feeling conspicuous by looking for caches in highly populated places. Looks like this probably wouldn't have been too bad to find though.

 

This is one reason why I skip most Stealth Required caches. I so wish virtual would come back!

Here it is.

[+t4e]

I see this

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14438239

 

I instantly think

 

http://coord.info/GCMEP5

 

how can it be that when the cache description clearly tells you

The cache is a micro transparent canister, with a small paper.

?

[+Brian~!]

I did the Colloseum cache when I was in Rome earlier in the year. There's no way that it caused a security alert, as it's a small container about the size of a tictac box hidden in a stone wall. Yes it was a pain in the a** due to muggles, but frankly I think that a tourist leaving a lunchbox around is far more likely.

[+BrixingtonPaddler]

I see this

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14438239

 

I instantly think

 

http://coord.info/GCMEP5

 

how can it be that when the cache description clearly tells you

The cache is a micro transparent canister, with a small paper.

?

 

What I meant was, I saw the article on the news about a suspect object, and the first thing I did was look for any cache in the area.

[+Brian~!]

I see this

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14438239

 

I instantly think

 

http://coord.info/GCMEP5

 

how can it be that when the cache description clearly tells you

The cache is a micro transparent canister, with a small paper.

?

 

What I meant was, I saw the article on the news about a suspect object, and the first thing I did was look for any cache in the area.

 

You're quite right to - however hopefully the police have realized they should check the same thing. Something else I can say about Rome is that there are no central caches bigger than their equivalent of a 35mm canister. Although scarily most of them are in dry stone walls. Also, finding a cache whilst standing on the spanish steps with four thousand muggles is rather exhilarating.

[+Hawkins2.5]

Lol, yes, avoided the Spanish Steps one too although we walked right past it. I just didn't have the courage for the actual search and retrieval!