+Gudlyf Posted March 24, 2003 Share Posted March 24, 2003 I have visited Aruba every year for the past 14 years, and should continue to do so for a while. The following cache was archived because I was told it was placed on vacation. It's a virtual cache that requires basically no maintenance, so I'm baffled as to why it's not approved. http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.asp?ID=60075 Thanks for your opinions! Link to comment
+ClayJar Posted March 24, 2003 Share Posted March 24, 2003 Not approved means nobody else can see it. You'll have to copy and paste to get any useful opinions. [Watcher Downloads] - [Official Geocaching Chat] Link to comment
+Gudlyf Posted March 24, 2003 Author Share Posted March 24, 2003 You'll need your own transportation, some good walking shoes, and be rather fit for this one. Take a picture from the final location and upload it here for true credit. There are actually several 'steps' to completing this task, which will be more evident once you get closer to the cache site. This one will take a bit of somewhat difficult walking, so bring your sneakers or hiking shoes, some water, and try to pace yourself. You'll get full credit for finding this site once you post a picture from the final location. Link to comment
+Gudlyf Posted March 24, 2003 Author Share Posted March 24, 2003 When I say "steps", it's quoted because there are about 550 stair steps one has to climb to get to the top of this very prominent mountain. Link to comment
+Gudlyf Posted March 24, 2003 Author Share Posted March 24, 2003 I read the virtual cache requirements and now realize this cache should remain archived. It's merely the top of a very prominent mountain in Aruba (you'd know it when you visited Aruba), which is a violation of virtual caches. Sorry to waste everyone's time. Link to comment
+Renegade Knight Posted March 24, 2003 Share Posted March 24, 2003 There are Vacation caches and Vacation caches. When I visit Scotland, that's a one time trip. If I put on in Kingman AZ, that one I can check up on every year or more often, plus I have the resources to take care of the cache there. There is a difference. A virtual vacation cache...that' a tougher call. Your virtual may have not been quite right, but that you go back all the time should of made the vacation part a non issue. Wherever you go there you are. Link to comment
+JoGPS Posted March 24, 2003 Share Posted March 24, 2003 It’s the choice of the cache owners Caching for Life or Divorce which ever comes first Link to comment
+Captain Morgan Posted March 28, 2003 Share Posted March 28, 2003 Poll results have disappeared during forum changes, so we all have to vote again... Link to comment
Recommended Posts