Jump to content

Did you know that PMO owners can see when you looked at their cache?


Recommended Posts

Posted

We learn things everyday and I just learned that PMO (Premium members only) cache has a nifty little feature that allows the cache owner to know that you visited their cache page and I think the time as well.

 

Did you know that? I sure didnt and dont remember giving consent either to have my wherebouts on the GC site disclosed to anyone else other than Groundspeak themselves.

So how do I go about OPTing OUT of this feature?

Posted

Yes on my handful of caches I can see who looked at my cache, how many visits, and when they last visited. It's just neat to look at especially on my puzzle caches. I'm amazed at how many people from across the country/world end up looking at the page for whatever reason.

 

Opt out? You cannot..... unless you use GSAK or another offline database. Download the gpx and read it offline and go straight to the log page and you'll never show up on the audit log. Really the audit log is harmless 99.99% of the time.

Posted

Just not sure why it is a problem for someone to know that you looked at their cache page.....stalker concerns? It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar...sorry, just don't get it.

Posted (edited)

 

So how do I go about OPTing OUT of this feature?

 

Obvious.

 

Quit looking at PMO cache listings.

 

It's not really a big deal though...it's not like they can tell what kind of porn you have downloaded to your PC or anything...

 

EDIT for speeling.

Edited by AZcachemeister
Posted

Congratulations! You win one free internet! :laughing:

 

Seriously though, the answer is simple (as others have mentioned). If you don't want to be logged in a PMO audit log, don't visit a PMO cache's page.

 

Done.

Posted

It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar

 

It's probably that kind of assumption that concerns the OP.

 

I just don't understand what kind of cookie the OP is worried about being exposed.....

Posted

It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar

 

It's probably that kind of assumption that concerns the OP.

 

I just don't understand what kind of cookie the OP is worried about being exposed.....

white-chocolate-chip-cookies1.jpg

Posted

It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar

 

It's probably that kind of assumption that concerns the OP.

 

I just don't understand what kind of cookie the OP is worried about being exposed.....

white-chocolate-chip-cookies1.jpg

 

I actually prefer semi-sweet chips....new picture please!

Posted

It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar

 

It's probably that kind of assumption that concerns the OP.

 

I just don't understand what kind of cookie the OP is worried about being exposed.....

 

I've read of people being falsely accused of stealing caches because of audit logs.

Posted

It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar

 

It's probably that kind of assumption that concerns the OP.

 

I just don't understand what kind of cookie the OP is worried about being exposed.....

 

I've read of people being falsely accused of stealing caches because of audit logs.

 

I must be naive....I have never heard of anything like this....

Posted

It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar

 

It's probably that kind of assumption that concerns the OP.

 

I just don't understand what kind of cookie the OP is worried about being exposed.....

 

I've read of people being falsely accused of stealing caches because of audit logs.

 

I must be naive....I have never heard of anything like this....

 

I've never read it anywhere.

Posted

It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar

 

It's probably that kind of assumption that concerns the OP.

 

I just don't understand what kind of cookie the OP is worried about being exposed.....

 

I've read of people being falsely accused of stealing caches because of audit logs.

 

I must be naive....I have never heard of anything like this....

Well, no wonder. You have only been a member since November, 2010. B)

 

 

:D

Posted

It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar

 

It's probably that kind of assumption that concerns the OP.

 

I just don't understand what kind of cookie the OP is worried about being exposed.....

 

I've read of people being falsely accused of stealing caches because of audit logs.

 

I must be naive....I have never heard of anything like this....

Well, no wonder. You have only been a member since November, 2010. B)

 

 

:D

 

Not that it really matters.....but that is FEBRUARY 2010...

Posted

It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar

 

It's probably that kind of assumption that concerns the OP.

 

I just don't understand what kind of cookie the OP is worried about being exposed.....

 

I've read of people being falsely accused of stealing caches because of audit logs.

 

I must be naive....I have never heard of anything like this....

Well, no wonder. You have only been a member since November, 2010. B)

 

 

:D

 

Not that it really matters.....but that is FEBRUARY 2010...

 

Right. There was a point to my post, however. Perhaps not an obvious one.

Posted

It is like you are worried about being caught with your hand in the cookie jar

 

It's probably that kind of assumption that concerns the OP.

 

I just don't understand what kind of cookie the OP is worried about being exposed.....

 

I've read of people being falsely accused of stealing caches because of audit logs.

 

I must be naive....I have never heard of anything like this....

Well, no wonder. You have only been a member since November, 2010. B)

 

 

:D

 

Not that it really matters.....but that is FEBRUARY 2010...

 

Right. There was a point to my post, however. Perhaps not an obvious one.

 

You zoomed right over my head....maybe that was the intention...no idea.....let me go get some ice cream and I will feel much better.

Posted

Well, no wonder. You have only been a member since November, 2010. B)

 

No, it is not silly. There are many cachers who wrongly accuse people who have looked at the cache page, but have not logged a found it for the cache in case the cache gets lost.

Posted

We learn things everyday and I just learned that PMO (Premium members only) cache has a nifty little feature that allows the cache owner to know that you visited their cache page and I think the time as well.

 

Did you know that? I sure didnt and dont remember giving consent either to have my wherebouts on the GC site disclosed to anyone else other than Groundspeak themselves.

So how do I go about OPTing OUT of this feature?

 

No such luck in OPTING OUT I actually like the feature, think it is pretty cool why do you care anyway?

Posted

Well, no wonder. You have only been a member since November, 2010. B)

 

No, it is not silly. There are many cachers who wrongly accuse people who have looked at the cache page, but have not logged a found it for the cache in case the cache gets lost.

 

Anyone have any evidence that this is anything more than a rare occurrence? Anything to show that more people get accused because of the audit log than any other reasons?

Posted

Well, no wonder. You have only been a member since November, 2010. B)

 

No, it is not silly. There are many cachers who wrongly accuse people who have looked at the cache page, but have not logged a found it for the cache in case the cache gets lost.

 

Anyone have any evidence that this is anything more than a rare occurrence? Anything to show that more people get accused because of the audit log than any other reasons?

 

No idea. I just said I read about people being accused. I don't know much about audit logs. Found that on Google while looking up more information.

Posted
Log out of the GC site, before viewing the page.

 

That's gonna give you a very blank cache listing.

 

It will also keep your user name off the audit log.

 

And it will keep you from being able to view any PMO caches, something you should be able to do as PM.

Posted
Log out of the GC site, before viewing the page.

 

That's gonna give you a very blank cache listing.

 

It will also keep your user name off the audit log.

 

And it will keep you from being able to view any PMO caches, something you should be able to do as PM.

 

Sometime there are trade-offs to be made in life. Besides, you can always get them in a PQ.

Posted
Sometime there are trade-offs to be made in life. Besides, you can always get them in a PQ.

This doesn't actually pertain life, it just pertains gc.com. And PQs are not a substitute for viewing a cache listing online.

Posted

We learn things everyday and I just learned that PMO (Premium members only) cache has a nifty little feature that allows the cache owner to know that you visited their cache page and I think the time as well.

 

Did you know that? I sure didnt and dont remember giving consent either to have my wherebouts on the GC site disclosed to anyone else other than Groundspeak themselves.

So how do I go about OPTing OUT of this feature?

Geocaching is a sneaky hobby. Angel from Slade_Angel

Posted
Sometime there are trade-offs to be made in life. Besides, you can always get them in a PQ.

This doesn't actually pertain life, it just pertains gc.com. And PQs are not a substitute for viewing a cache listing online.

 

I don't know about your life but geocaching is a part of mine.

 

I still don't get what everyone is afraid of. An audit log doesn't tell me your name, address, or pin number.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...