+Gasolin Posted April 16, 2011 Share Posted April 16, 2011 Maybe I just don't get it right but how do I get a query do work? I tried different options available and still don't get any result even though I know that there is a new cache within reach of the query! Quote Link to comment
+jacob501 Posted April 16, 2011 Share Posted April 16, 2011 don't understand your question!!! Quote Link to comment
+Gasolin Posted April 16, 2011 Author Share Posted April 16, 2011 (edited) don't understand your question!!! If I run a PQ and I know there is a new cache whitin the limits set in the query and I still get: Thanks! Your pocket query has been modified and currently results in 0 caches. What did I miss? I don't have any limitations and accept any cache! Edited April 16, 2011 by Gasolin Quote Link to comment
+jacob501 Posted April 16, 2011 Share Posted April 16, 2011 If you know there is a new cache why do you need a PQ? I'm not trying to say your question is dumb I was just wondering... Quote Link to comment
+Gitchee-Gummee Posted April 16, 2011 Share Posted April 16, 2011 don't understand your question!!! If I run a PQ and I know there is a new cache whitin the limits set in the query and I still get: Thanks! Your pocket query has been modified and currently results in 0 caches. What did I miss? I don't have any limitations and accept any cache! I sounds as though when setting parameters for the PQ, you have checked some boxes that probably self-canceled. End result: 0 caches. Quote Link to comment
+dfx Posted April 16, 2011 Share Posted April 16, 2011 Did you select any mutually exclusive attributes? Like caches that "you have found" AND that "you haven't found"? Quote Link to comment
+Gasolin Posted April 16, 2011 Author Share Posted April 16, 2011 If you know there is a new cache why do you need a PQ? I'm not trying to say your question is dumb I was just wondering... I know it seems stupid but when I found out that there where a new cache and my query said it wasn't I had to ask around what I did wrong! Quote Link to comment
+jacob501 Posted April 16, 2011 Share Posted April 16, 2011 If you know there is a new cache why do you need a PQ? I'm not trying to say your question is dumb I was just wondering... I know it seems stupid but when I found out that there where a new cache and my query said it wasn't I had to ask around what I did wrong! oh ok! Quote Link to comment
+Gasolin Posted April 16, 2011 Author Share Posted April 16, 2011 Did you select any mutually exclusive attributes? Like caches that "you have found" AND that "you haven't found"? I tried both checked and uncecked option with the same result... Quote Link to comment
+jacob501 Posted April 16, 2011 Share Posted April 16, 2011 check EVERY SINGLE THING in your query. if you've already done that then something is wrong with the cache... Quote Link to comment
Pup Patrol Posted April 16, 2011 Share Posted April 16, 2011 I know I had a pq return with "0" caches because I selected a bunch of attributes, a couple of which contradicted each other. I ran another one, with no attributes selected, and it ran fine. Another mistake that I've read about often in the forums is not selecting a day of the week. Maybe this page will provide some help: http://support.Groundspeak.com/index.php?pg=kb.page&id=118 It's found under the Knowledge Books section "Premium Membership": http://support.Groundspeak.com/index.php?pg=kb.book&id=5 Quote Link to comment
+tozainamboku Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 You may also want to take a look at Markwell's Pocket Query FAQ Quote Link to comment
+Gasolin Posted April 18, 2011 Author Share Posted April 18, 2011 Thank you ALL for your support! The mistake I did was like "Pup Patrol" wrote, too many attributes AND too short distance from selected lokation I'm glad that it's solved Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.