+wmpastor Posted June 27, 2013 Posted June 27, 2013 Its not the finders fault that your cache was in need of maintenance. While I'm big on agreeing that the paper log needs signed, I also think there is an obvious exception when there is a physical problem with the cache or the log is destroyed. Its obvious these people found the location, and they were able to see the contents of the cache, with the missing log book. Its not their fault, its your fault. I would say the logs should stand. Now, when I say its your fault, yes, you did just take possession of the cache, and yes, you were working on it, but again, its not their fault. It's not my fault it's the last owners fault. Their is no find to complain about as it was not a find as there was no cache or it was disabled at the time of their find. Gotta love it! I come to the forums for this! I live for this!
+The A-Team Posted June 28, 2013 Posted June 28, 2013 Its not the finders fault that your cache was in need of maintenance. While I'm big on agreeing that the paper log needs signed, I also think there is an obvious exception when there is a physical problem with the cache or the log is destroyed. Its obvious these people found the location, and they were able to see the contents of the cache, with the missing log book. Its not their fault, its your fault. I would say the logs should stand. Now, when I say its your fault, yes, you did just take possession of the cache, and yes, you were working on it, but again, its not their fault. It's not my fault it's the last owners fault. Their is no find to complain about as it was not a find as there was no cache or it was disabled at the time of their find. Gotta love it! I come to the forums for this! I live for this! Pssst, you're 2 years late to the party...
Recommended Posts