+cx1 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 An hour? Just get 500 or so film cans, pre-sign all the logs, then swap all the film cans in the big container with the ones you've with you. It should only take a minute to "find 500 caches" but it'll probably take longer to cut-n-paste the online logs. But if you do that right after I've done that then the proof of my signing all the logs is gone Logging is quick now that they can be empty. Don't need to paste anything Quote Link to comment
+fizzymagic Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 You know, I was thinking about this topic, and I realized that multicaches with a smiley per stage might be a way to deal with the power-trail problem. There are several advantages: Multi stages don't have to be 528 feet apart, so you could get thousands of smileys per mile. The multicache owner could explicitly allow moving containers from one stage to another, obviating the whole debate about that practice. The entire power trail would show up as one cache, eliminating the PQ pollution problem. Maybe it's worth considering. (Sorry if this is off-topic. If anybody else likes the idea, maybe we should start a new thread.) Quote Link to comment
+BCandMsKitty Posted January 26, 2011 Share Posted January 26, 2011 Thousands of smileys per mile? A power cache with 500 smileys in one pail?? It's making my head hurt! Quote Link to comment
+Castle Mischief Posted January 26, 2011 Share Posted January 26, 2011 Please no. Quote Link to comment
+niraD Posted January 26, 2011 Share Posted January 26, 2011 (Sorry if this is off-topic. If anybody else likes the idea, maybe we should start a new thread.)Done: New Cache Type: Numbers Run Trail? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.