Not published?

[hoosier guy]

After the update I got an email that someone had found one of my "unpublished" caches. This one was ublished about 5 weeks go. I think the update made some things a bit goofy.

[+ScaredOfBees]

I have a cache that's been published for 4 years and has 309 finds. Today's "found it" said it was not published!

[GOF and Bacall]

After the update I got an email that someone had found one of my "unpublished" caches. This one was ublished about 5 weeks go. I think the update made some things a bit goofy.

 

Don't they all?

[hoosier guy]

After the update I got an email that someone had found one of my "unpublished" caches. This one was ublished about 5 weeks go. I think the update made some things a bit goofy.

 

Don't they all?

 

You make a good point there.

[+ReedKyCacheFinders]

Yeah, I have saw this same thing with caches we own. We go to the listing & it's there up & looking fine, But when we get a e mail letting us know someone found it, the subject line in the e mail reads "[LOG] Owner: John Doe found The Pines of Bethel Hill!! (Not Published) (Traditional Cache)‏" I added the John Doe.

So what gives???

[+42at42]

The way it was

 

@#$%^ found Thorold's Klondike II (Traditional Cache) at 8/2/2010

 

The way it is

 

@#$%^# found Sea Burn (Not Published) (Traditional Cache) at 11/10/2010

 

I don't know what they did but it is a little messed up.

[+Avernar]

I got two of those logs as well today. In both cases the log, in the email and on my cache page, had no text.